A full-scale, three-dimensional, transient CFD modelling approach capable of predicting the three-phase fluid flow characteristics and the inclusion removal in a gas-stirred ladle was developed. The comparison with experimental data indicates that this model can accurately predict the multiphase fluid flow and slag eye behaviour. The transport and removal of the inclusions in the gas-stirred ladle were predicted by tracing the movement of individual inclusions through computing their particle trajectories and considering a fluctuant top slag layer. The effects of inclusion size, gas flow rates, and injected bubble diameters as well as various removal mechanisms including slag capture, bubble attachment, and ladle wall adhesion on the removal of inclusions were investigated. It is shown that the slag capture is the prevailing mechanism for inclusion removal and the gas flow rate is the most important parameter for enhancing the inclusion removal efficiency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LouWTZhuMY.Numerical simulations of inclusion behavior in gas-stirred ladles. Metall Mater Trans B. 2013;44B:762–782. doi: 10.1007/s11663-013-9802-3
2.
GengDQLeiHHeJC.Numerical simulation for collision and growth of inclusions in ladles stirred with different porous plug configurations. ISIJ Int2010;50:1597–1605. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.50.1597
3.
KangYJYuLDuSC.Study of inclusion removal mechanism around open eye in ladle treatment. Ironmak Steelmak. 2007;34:253–261. doi: 10.1179/174328107X168101
4.
HallbergMJönssonPGJonssonTLIet al.Process model of inclusion separation in a stirred steel ladle. Scand J Metall. 2005;34:41–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0692.2005.00716.x
5.
O’MalleyRJ.Inclusion evolution and removal in ladle refining. AISTech 2017 proceedings;Nashville, TN;2017 May 8–11; p. 1567–1585.
6.
ZhangJLeeHG.Numerical modeling of nucleation and growth of inclusions in molten steel based on mean processing parameters. ISIJ Int. 2004;44:1629–1638. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.44.1629
7.
KwonYJZhangJLeeHG.A CFD-based nucleation-growth-removal model for inclusion behavior in a gas-agitated ladle during molten steel deoxidation. ISIJ Int. 2008;48:891–900. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.48.891
8.
ZhangLPluschkellW.Nucleation and growth kinetics of inclusions during liquid steel deoxidation. Ironmak Steelmak. 2003;30:106–110. doi: 10.1179/030192303225001766
9.
GardinPGauthierSSimonnetMet al.Multiphase model for predicting the elimination of inclusions inside a liquid-steel ladle. Adv Eng Mater. 2011;13:538–542. doi: 10.1002/adem.201000361
10.
ZhangLAokiJThomasBG.Inclusion removal by bubble flotation in continuous casting mold. MS&t 2004 conference proceedings;New Orleans, LA;2004. p. 161–177.
11.
WangLHLeeHGHayeP.Prediction of the optimum bubble size for inclusion removal from molten steel by flotation. ISIJ Int. 1996;36:7–16. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.36.7
12.
WangLTZhangQYPengSHet al.Mathematical model for growth and removal of inclusion in a multi-tuyere ladle during gas-stirring. ISIJ Int. 2005;45:331–337. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.45.331
13.
ANSYS FLUENT 17.1: User’s Guide. ANSYS, Inc.
14.
VenturiniP.Modelling of particle wall-deposition in two phase gas-solid flows [dissertation]. Sapienza University of Rome; 2010.
15.
CaoQPittsANastacL.Numerical modelling of fluid flow and desulphurisation kinetics in an argon-stirred ladle furnace. Ironmak Steelmak. 2016: 1–8. doi: 10.1080/03019233.2016.1262574
16.
CloeteSWPEksteenJJBradshawSM.A mathematical modelling study of fluid flow and mixing in full-scale gas-stirred ladles. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn. 2009;9:345–356. doi: 10.1504/PCFD.2009.027365
17.
ZhangLFAokiJThomasBG.Inclusion removal by bubble flotation in a continuous casting mold. Metall Mater Trans B. 2006;37B:361–379. doi: 10.1007/s11663-006-0021-z
18.
XuYGErssonMJönssonPG.A numerical study about the influence of a bubble wake flow on the removal of inclusions. ISIJ Int. 2016;56:1982–1988. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-249
19.
NastacLZhangDJCaoQet al.3D CFD modelling of the LMF system. TMS 2016 annual meeting & exhibition;Nashville, TN;2016. p. 187–194.
20.
ShengYYIronsGA.The impact of bubble dynamics on the flow in plumes of ladle water models. Metall Mater Trans B. 1995;26(3):625–635. doi: 10.1007/BF02653883
21.
KrishnapisharodyKIronsGA.An extended model for slag eye size in ladle metallurgy. ISIJ Int. 2008;48:1807–1809. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.48.1807
22.
KrishnapisharodyKIronsGA.Modeling of slag eye formation over a metal bath due to gas bubbling. Metall Mater Trans B. 2006;37B:763–772. doi: 10.1007/s11663-006-0058-z
23.
YonezawaKSchwerdtfegerK.Spout eyes formed by an emerging gas plume at the surface of a slag-covered metal melt. Metall Mater Trans B. 1999;30B:411–418. doi: 10.1007/s11663-999-0073-y
24.
HanJWHeoSHKamDHet al.Transient fluid flow phenomena in a gas stirred liquid bath with top oil layer-approach by numerical simulation and water model experiments. ISIJ Int. 2001;41:1165–1172. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.41.1165
25.
ZhangLF.Mathematical simulation of fluid flow in gas-stirred liquid systems. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2000;8:463–476. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/8/4/305
26.
AokiJZhangLFThomasBG.Modeling of inclusion removal in ladle refining. 3rd Internat. Congress on Science & Technology of Steelmaking;Charlotte, NC;2005 May 9–11. p. 319–332.
27.
ZhangLFThomasBG.Alumina inclusion behavior during steel deoxidation. 7th European electric steelmaking conference;Venice, Italy;2002 May 26–29. p. 277–286.
28.
NakanishiKFujiiTSzekelyJ.Possible relationship between energy dissipation and agitation in steel processing operations. Ironmak Steelmak. 1975;3:193–197.
