In three experiments rats were trained to make two different instrumental responses for different outcomes. Then the outcomes were given a single differential conditioning experience with lithium chloride. That differential treatment was sufficient to produce differential instrumental responding in a subsequent test. Re-exposure to the devalued outcome was not necessary for an impact on instrumental performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsC.DickinsonA. (1981). Actions and habits: Variations in associative representations during instrumental learning.Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms.SpearN. E.MillerR. R.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc143–166.
2.
BalleineB.DickinsonA. (1991). Instrumental performance following reinforcer devaluation depends upon incentive learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology43B, 279–296.
3.
ColwillR. M.RescorlaR. A. (1985). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes11, 120–132.
4.
ColwillR. M.RescorlaR. A. (1988). The role of response-reinforcer associations increases throughout extended instrumental training.Animal Learning and Behavior16, 105–111.
5.
DickinsonA. (1989). Expectancy theory in animal conditioning.Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory.KleinS. B.MowrerR. R.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc279–308.
6.
DickinsonA.BalleineB. (1990). Motivational control of instrumental performance following a shift from thirst to hunger.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology42B, 413–431.
7.
DickinsonA.DawsonG. R. (1988). Motivational control of instrumental performance: The role of prior experience of the reinforcer.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology40B, 113–134.
8.
DickinsonA.DawsonG. R. (1989). Incentive learning and the motivational control of instrumental performance.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology41B, 99–112.
9.
HollandP. C.StraubJ. J. (1979). Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes5, 65–78.
10.
KonorskiJ. (1948). Conditioned reflex and neuron organizationCambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
11.
MorganM. J. (1974). Resistance to satiation.Animal Behavior22, 449–466.
12.
NachmanM.AsheJ. H. (1973). Learned taste aversions in rats as a function of dosage, concentration, and route of administration of LiCl.Physiology and Behavior10, 73–78.
13.
RescorlaR. A. (1977). Pavlovian second-order conditioning: Some implications for instrumental behavior.Operant-Pavlovian interaction.DavisH.HurwitzH. M.B.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc133–164.
14.
RescorlaR. A. (1979). Conditioned inhibition and extinction.Mechanisms of learning and motivation.DickinsonA.BoakesR. A.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc83–110.
15.
RescorlaR. A. (1980). Pavlovian second-order conditioningHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16.
RescorlaR. A. (1991). Associations of multiple outcomes with an instrumental response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes17, 465–474.
17.
RescorlaR. A.HollandP. C. (1982). Behavioral studies of associative learning in animals.Annual Review of Psychology.RosenzweigM. R.PorterL. W.33, 265–298.
