Effects of Overtraining on Reversal Learning by Rats in Concurrent and Single Discriminations

Abstract

Two experiments examined the whole–partial effect of overtraining in concurrent discriminations and assessed the effect against single discrimination training in rats. In Experiment 1 overtraining facilitated reversal in Group W, in which rats were given concurrent training on two simultaneous discrimination tasks (A and B) in original learning before both tasks were reversed. By contrast, overtraining delayed reversal in Group P, in which animals were given the same training as in Group W in original learning, but only Task A was reversed. After overtraining, Group W reversed more rapidly than Group P. Without overtraining, Group P reversed more rapidly than both Group W and Group C, in which animals were trained only on Task A before this task was reversed. Experiment 2 investigated the effects of overtraining on the reversal of a successive discrimination in Groups W, P, and C. In addition, animals in a further group, Group S, received the same concurrent training as Group W before Task B was omitted and Task A reversed. Overtraining facilitated reversal in Groups W, C, and S but delayed it in Group P. After overtraining, Group W reversed more rapidly than Groups P, S, and C. Both Groups S and C also reversed more rapidly than did Group P. Without overtraining, Group P reversed more rapidly than Groups W, S, and C. There were no significant differences in reversal performance among Groups W, S, and C. These findings indicate that the effects of overtraining on reversal learning in concurrent discriminations differ from those observed in single discriminations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Erlebacher

(1963). Reversal learning in rats as a function of percentage of reinforcement and degree of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66, 84–90.

Hall

(1973a). Response strategies after overtraining in the jumping stand. Animal Learning and Behavior 1, 157–160.

Hall

(1973b). Overtraining and reversal learning in the rat: Effects of stimulus salience and response strategies. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 84, 169–175.

Hall

(1974). Transfer effect produced by overtraining in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 87, 938–944.

Lawrence

D. H.

(1949). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: I. Transfer between discriminations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology 39, 770–784.

Lawrence

D. H.

(1950). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: II. Selective association in a constant stimulus situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40, 175–188.

Liu

S. W.

Zeiler

M. D.

(1968). Independence of concurrent discrimination. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 65, 61–65.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1965). Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin 64, 124–150.

Mandler

J. M.

(1966). Behavior changes during overtraining and their effects on reversal and transfer. Psychological Monograph Supplement, I 187–202.

10.

Mandler

J. M.

(1968). Overtraining and the use of positive and negative stimuli in reversal and transfer. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 66, 110–115.

11.

Mandler

J. M.

Hooper

M. R.

(1967). Overtraining and goal approach strategies in discrimination reversal. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 19, 142–149.

12.

Nakagawa

(1973). Effects of overtraining on whole and partial reversal learning in while rats. Master Thesis in Psychology. Faculty of Literature, Kyoto University (in Japanese).

13.

Nakagawa

(1978a). The effect of overtraining on concurrent discrimination learning (in Japanese). Memoirs of Faculty of Education. Kagawa University 7, 45 111–133.

14.

Nakagawa

(1978b). The effect of overtraining on discrimination learning in white rats (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Psychology 49, 70–77.

15.

Nakagawa

(1979). Examination of a cue-association in the concurrent discrimination situation (in Japanese). Memoirs of Faculty of Education, Kagawa University II, 29 227–239.

16.

Nakagawa

(1980a). The effect of overtraining on concurrent discrimination in Kindergarten children (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 28, 38–47.

17.

Nakagawa

(1980b). Effects of the overtraining on concurrent discrimination in kindergarten children (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 28, 114–123.

18.

Nakagawa

(1981). Effects of amount of initial discrimination learning on subsequent discrimination shifts in young children (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 29, 95–104.

19.

Nakagawa

(1984). Easiness of reversal learning in a concurrent discrimination as a function of degree of overtraining in white rats (in Japanese). Memoirs of Faculty of Education, Kagawa University II, 34 117–126.

20.

Nakagawa

(1986). Overtraining, extinction and shift learning in a concurrent discrimination in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 38B, 213–326.

21.

Pubols

B. H.

Jr. (1956). The facilitation of visual and spatial discrimination reversal by overtraining. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 49, 243–248.

22.

Reid

L. S.

(1953). The development of noncontinuity behavior through continuity learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46, 107–112.

23.

Sanders

(1971). Factors affecting reversal and nonreversal shifts in rats and children. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 74, 192–202.

24.

Sasaki

Shinoda

(1969). The whole reversal learning and the part reversal learning in hooded rats (in Japanese). XLIX series of Psychologies. College of General Education, University of Tokyo 135–159 The Proceedings of the Department of Humanities.

25.

Sutherland

N. S.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning New York: Academic Press.