As promised in the Introduction, this Special Issue presents several recurring themes concerning the perirhinal cortex and its neighbours within the medial temporal lobe (MTL). First, although orthodoxy insists that the diverse constituents of the MTL operate as a single functional entity, several papers presented here challenge that idea, although some defend it. Second, although many experts hold that the MTL subserves memory but not perception, several papers presented here point to a role for certain MTL structures in both. Third, although some researchers have invoked “species differences” to account for discrepant findings, several papers presented here document a striking convergence of findings in humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents. We close this Special Issue by high-lighting these recurring themes, acknowledging discrepant findings and pointing to future research that might resolve some current controversies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AggletonJPBrownMW (this issue). Contrasting hippocampal, perirhinal cortex function using imme-diate early gene imaging.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 218–233.
2.
AguirreGKDetreJAAlsopDCD'EspositoM (1996). The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man.Cerebral Cortex6, 823–829.
3.
BakerCIBehrmannMOlsonCR (2002). Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex.Nature Neuroscience5, 1210–1216.
4.
BannermanDMYeeBKGoodMAHeupelMJIversenSDRawlinsJN (1999). Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus: a comparison of dorsal, ventral, and complete hippocampal cytotoxic lesions.Behavioral Neuroscience113, 1170–1188.
5.
BaxterMGMurrayEA (2001). Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching-to-sample deficits in monkeys.Hippocampus11, 61–71.
6.
Beason-HeldLLRoseneDLKillianyRJMossMB (1999). Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey.Hippocampus9, 562–574.
7.
BrightPMossHEStamatakisEATylerLK (this issue). The anatomy of object processing: The role of anteromedial temporal cortex.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 361–377.
8.
BrownMWWilsonFAWRichesIP (1987). Neuronal evidence that inferomedial temporal cortex is more important than hippocampus in certain processes underlying recognition memory.Brain Research409, 158–162.
9.
BuckleyMJ (this issue). The role of the perirhinal cortex, hippocampus in learning, memory, and perception.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 246–268.
10.
BuckleyMJBoothMCRollsETGaffanD (2001). Selective perceptual impairments after perirhinal cortex ablation.Journal of Neuroscience21, 9824–9836.
11.
BuckleyMJGaffanD (1998a). Learning and transfer of object-reward associations and the role of the perirhinal cortex.Behavioral Neuroscience112, 15–23.
BuffaloEARamusSJSquireLRZolaSM (2000). Perception and recognition memory in monkeys following lesions of area TE and perirhinal cortex.Learning & Memory7, 375–382.
15.
BuffaloEAReberPJSquireLR (1998). The human perirhinal cortex and recognition memory.Hippocampus8, 330–339.
16.
BurwellRD (2000). The parahippocampal region: Corticocortical connectivity. In H. E. Scharfman, M. P. Witter, & R. Schwarcz (Eds.), The parahippocampal region. Implications for neurological and psychiatric diseases25–42New York:New York Academy of Sciences.
17.
BusseyTJSaksidaLM (2002). The organization of visual object representations: A connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex.European Journal of Neuroscience15, 355–364.
18.
BusseyTJSaksidaLMMurrayEA (2002). Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in complex visual discriminations.European Journal of Neuroscience15, 365–374.
19.
BusseyTJSaksidaLMMurrayEA (2003). Impairments in visual discrimination after perirhinal cortex lesions: Testing ‘declarative’ vs.‘perceptual-mnemonic’ views of perirhinal cortex function. European Journal of Neuroscience17, 649–660.
20.
BusseyTJSaksidaLMMurrayEA (this issue). The perceptual-mnemonic/feature conjunction model of perirhinal cortex function.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 269–282.
21.
CassadayHJRawlinsJN (1997). The hippocampus, objects, and their contexts.Behavioral Neuroscience111, 1228–1244.
22.
DavachiLMitchellJPWagnerAD (2003). Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA100, 2157–2162.
23.
DaviesRRGrahamKSXuerebJHWilliamsGBHodgesJR (2004). The human perirhinal cortex and semantic memory.European Journal of Neuroscience20, 2441–2446.
24.
DesimoneRUngerleiderLG (1989). Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In F. Boller & J. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology 2, 267–299New York:Elsevier Science.
25.
EacottMJGaffanEA (this issue). The roles of the perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, the fornix in memory for objects, contexts, and events in the rat.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 202–217.
26.
EacottMJGaffanDMurrayEA (1994). Preserved recognition memory for small sets, and impaired stim-ulus identification for large sets, following rhinal cortex ablations in monkeys.European Journal of Neuroscience6, 1466–1478.
27.
EpsteinRKanwisherN (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment.Nature392, 598–601.
28.
EricksonCADesimoneR (1999). Responses of macaque perirhinal neurons during and after visual stimulus association learning.Journal of Neuroscience19, 10404–10416.
29.
FahyFLRichesIPBrownMW (1993). Neuronal activity related to visual recognition memory: Long-term memory and the encoding of recency and familiarity information in the primate anterior and medial inferior temporal and rhinal cortex.Experimental Brain Research96, 457–472.
30.
GaffanD (1994a). Dissociated effects of perirhinal cortex ablation, fornix transection and amygdalectomy: Evidence for multiple memory systems in the primate temporal lobe.Experimental Brain Research99, 411–422.
31.
GaffanD (1994b). Scene-specific memory for objects: A model of episodic memory impairment in monkeys with fornix transection.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience6, 305–320.
32.
GaffanD (2001). What is a memory system? Horel's critique revisited.Behavioural Brain Research127, 5–11.
33.
GaffanD (2002). Against memory systems.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London357, 1111–1121.
34.
GaffanDParkerA (1996). Interaction of perirhinal cortex with the fornix-fimbria: Memory for objects and “object in place” memory.Journal of Neuroscience16, 5864–5869.
35.
GaffanEAHealeyANEacottMJ (2004). Objects and positions in visual scenes: Effects of perirhinal and postrhinal cortex lesions in the rat.Behavioral Neuroscience118, 992–1010.
36.
GouletSMurrayEA (2001). Neural substrates of crossmodal association memory in monkeys: The amygdala versus the anterior rhinal cortex.Behavioral Neuroscience115, 271–284.
37.
GrahamKSGaffanD (this issue). The role of the medial temporal lobe in memory, perception: Evidence from rats, nonhuman primates and humans.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 193–201.
38.
HamptonRR (this issue). Monkey perirhinal cortex is critical for visual memory, but not for visual perception: Reexamination of the behavioural evidence from monkeys.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 283–299.
39.
HamptonRRHampsteadBMMurrayEA (2004). Selective hippocampal damage in rhesus monkeys impairs spatial memory in an open-field test.Hippocampus14, 808–818.
40.
HamptonRRMurrayEA (2002). Learning of discriminations is impaired, but generalization to altered views is intact, in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with perirhinal cortex removal.Behavioral Neuroscience116, 363–377.
41.
HensonR (this issue). A mini-review of fMRI studies of human medial temporal lobe activity associated with recognition memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 340–360.
42.
HiguchiSMiyashitaY (1996). Formation of mnemonic neuronal responses to visual paired associates in inferotemporal cortex is impaired by perirhinal and entorhinal cortex lesions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA93, 739–743.
43.
HoldstockJS (this issue). The role of the human medial temporal lobe in object recognition, object discrimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 326–339.
44.
HoldstockJSGutnikovSAGaffanDMayesAR (2000). Perceptual and mnemonic matching-to-sample in humans: Contributions of the hippocampus, perirhinal and other medial temporal lobe cortices.Cortex36, 301–322.
45.
HölscherCRollsETXiangJ (2003). Perirhinal cortex neuronal activity related to long-term familiarity memory in the macaque.European Journal of Neuroscience18, 2037–2046.
46.
KjelstrupKGTuvnesFASteffenachHAMurisonRMoserEIMoserMB (2002). Reduced fear expression after lesions of the ventral hippocampus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA99, 10825–10830.
47.
LeeACHBarenseMDGrahamKS (this issue). The contribution of the human medial temporal lobe to perception: Bridging the gap between animal, human studies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 300–325.
48.
LeeACBusseyTJMurrayEASaksidaLMEpsteinRAKapurN (2005). et al. Perceptual deficits in amnesia: Challenging the medial temporal lobe ‘mnemonic’ view.Neuropsychologia43, 1–11.
49.
LevyDAShragerYSquireLR (2005). Intact visual discrimination of complex and feature-ambiguous stimuli in the absence of perirhinal cortex.Learning & Memory12, 61–66.
50.
LiLMillerEKDesimoneR (1993). The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology69, 1918–1929.
51.
LiuZRichmondBJ (2000). Response differences in monkey TE and perirhinal cortex: Stimulus association related to reward schedules.Journal of Neurophysiology83, 1677–1692.
52.
LogothetisNKScheinbergDL (1996). Visual object recognition.Annual Review of Neuroscience19, 577–621.
53.
MaguireEAFrackowiakRSJFrithCD (1996). Learning to find your way: A role for the human hippocampal formation.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences263, 1745–1750.
54.
MalkovaLMishkinM (2003). One-trial memory for object-place associations after separate lesions of hippocampus and posterior parahippocampal region in the monkey.Journal of Neuroscience23, 1956–1965.
55.
MannsJRHopkinsROSquireLR (2003). Semantic memory and the human hippocampus.Neuron38, 127–133.
56.
MeunierMBachevalierJMishkinMMurrayEA (1993). Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys.Journal of Neuroscience13, 5418–5432.
57.
MillerEKDesimoneR (1994). Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory.Science263, 520–522.
58.
MiyashitaY (1988). Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex.Nature335, 817–820.
59.
MurrayEA (1996). What have ablation studies told us about the neural substrates of stimulus memory?.Seminars in the Neurosciences5, 10–20.
60.
MurrayEABaxterMGGaffanD (1998a). Monkeys with rhinal cortex damage or neurotoxic hippocampal lesions are impaired on spatial scene learning and object reversals.Behavioral Neuroscience112, 1291–1303.
61.
MurrayEABusseyTJ (1999). Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex.Trends in Cognitive Science3, 142–151.
62.
MurrayEABusseyTJHamptonRRSaksidaLM (2000). The parahippocampal region and object identification. In H. E. Scharfman, M. P. Witter, & R. Schwarcz (Eds.), The Parahippocampal region. Implications for neurological and psychiatric diseases166–174New York:New York Academy of Sciences.
63.
MurrayEAGaffanDMishkinM (1993). Neural substrates of visual stimulus-stimulus association in rhesus monkeys.Journal of Neuroscience13, 4549–4561.
64.
MurrayEAMalkovaLGouletS (1998b). Crossmodal associations, intramodal associations, and object identification. In A. D. Milner (Ed.), Comparative neuropsychology51–69Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
65.
MurrayEAMishkinM (1998). Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus.Journal of Neuroscience18, 6568–6582.
66.
MurrayEAWiseSP (2004). What, if anything, is the medial temporal lobe, and how can the amygdala be part of it if there is no such thing?.Neurobiology of Learning & Memory82, 178–198.
67.
ParkerAGaffanD (1998). Interaction of frontal and perirhinal cortices in visual object recognition memory in monkeys.European Journal of Neuroscience10, 3044–3057.
68.
ParkinsonJKMurrayEAMishkinM (1988). A selective mnemonic role for the hippocampus in monkeys: Memory for the location of objects.Journal of Neuroscience8, 4159–4167.
69.
RanganathCYonelinasAPCohenMXDyCJTomSMD'EspositoM (2004). Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes.Neuropsychologia42, 2–13.
70.
RingoJL (1991). Memory decays at the same rate in macaques with and without brain lesions when expressed in d' or arcsine terms.Behavioural Brain Research42, 123–134.
71.
RollsETFrancoLStringerSM (this issue). The perirhinal cortex, long-term familiarity memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58B, 234–245.
72.
SakaiKMiyashitaY (1991). Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates.Nature354, 152–155.
73.
SakaiKMiyashitaY (1993). Memory and imagery in the temporal lobe.Current Opinion in Neurobiology3, 166–170.
74.
SaksidaLMBusseyTJBuckmasterCAMurrayEA (2003). Perirhinal cortex lesions can impair, and hippocampal lesions can facilitate, transverse patterning in rhesus monkeys. Program No. 939.12.2003 abstract viewer/itinerary plannerWashington, DC:Society for Neuroscience.
75.
SaksidaLMBusseyTJBuckmasterCAMurrayEA (2005). The role of the hippocampus in feature ambiguous discriminationsUnpublished raw data.
76.
SobotkaSRingoJL (1993). Investigation of long-term recognition and association memory in unit responses from inferotemporal cortex.Experimental Brain Research96, 28–38.
77.
SobotkaSRingoJL (1996). Mnemonic responses of single units recorded from monkey inferotemporal cortex, accessed via transcommissural vs. direct pathways.Journal of Neuroscience16, 4222–4230.
78.
SquireLRStarkCEClarkRE (2004). The medial temporal lobe.Annual Reviews of Neuroscience27, 279–306.
79.
StarkCELSquireLR (2000). Intact visual perceptual discrimination in humans in the absence of perirhinal cortex.Learning & Memory7, 273–278.
80.
StarkCESquireLR (2003). Hippocampal damage equally impairs memory for single items and memory for conjunctions.Hippocampus13, 281–292.
81.
SuzukiWA (1996). Neuroanatomy of the monkey entorhinal, perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices: Organization of cortical inputs and interconnections with amygdala and striatum.Seminars in the Neurosciences8, 3–12.
82.
SuzukiWAAmaralDG (1994). Topographic organization of the reciprocal connections between monkey entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices.Journal of Neuroscience14, 1856–1877.
83.
TanakaK (1997). Mechanisms of visual object recognition: Monkey and human studies.Current Opinion in Neurobiology7, 523–529.
84.
ThorntonJARothblatLAMurrayEA (1997). Rhinal cortex removal produces amnesia for preoperatively learned discrimination problems but fails to disrupt postoperative acquisition and retention in rhesus monkeys.Journal of Neuroscience17, 8536–8549.
85.
Vargha-KhademFGadianDGMishkinM (2001). Dissociations in cognitive memory: The syndrome of developmental amnesia.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences356, 1435–1440.
86.
WixtedJTSquireLR (2004). Recall and recognition are equally impaired in patients with selective hippocampal damage.Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience4, 58–66.
87.
ZhuXOBrownMWAggletonJP (1995). Neuronal signaling of information important to visual recognition memory in rat rhinal and neighboring cortices.European Journal of Neuroscience7, 753–765.
