The Espinet and the perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning: Do they depend on a common inhibitory mechanism?

Abstract

In three experiments rats were given short or long preexposure (4 or 10 sessions) to two compound flavours, AX and BX, according to an intermixed or a blocked schedule. Following preexposure, aversion conditioning trials were given with AX as the conditioned stimulus (CS). In Experiments 1 and 2, retardation and summation tests were then carried out to assess the inhibitory properties of B (an Espinet procedure). In Experiment 3, test trials evaluated generalization from AX to BX (the standard perceptual learning procedure). The results showed that B performed as an inhibitor of the unconditioned stimulus (US; an Espinet effect) only after long intermixed preexposure, whereas a reliable perceptual learning effect was observed both after short and after long preeexposure. The observation that B had no detectable inhibitory properties after short preexposure casts doubt on the suggestion that inhibitory learning is responsible for perceptual learning after brief exposure to AX and BX.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Artigas

Chamizo

Peris

(2001). Inhibitory associations between neutral stimuli: A comparative approach. Animal Learning and Behavior 29, 46–65.

Bennett

Scahill

Griffiths

Mackintosh

(1999). The role of inhibitory associations in perceptual learning. Animal Learning and Behavior 27, 333–345.

Blair

CAJ

Hall

(2003). Perceptual learning in flavour aversion: Evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 29, 39–48.

Dwyer

Bennett

Mackintosh

(2001). Evidence for inhibitory associations between the unique elements of two compound flavours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54B, 97–107.

Dwyer

Hodder

Honey

(2004). Perceptual learning in humans: Role of preexposure schedule, feedback and discrimination assay. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57B, 245–259.

Dwyer

Mackintosh

(2002). Alternating exposure to two compound flavors creates inhibitory associations between their unique features. Animal Learning and Behavior 30, 177–200.

Espinet

Iraola

Bennett

Mackintosh

(1995). Inhibitory associations between neutral stimuli in flavor-aversion conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior 23, 361–368.

Honey

Bateson

Horn

(1994). The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: An investigation with the domestic chick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47B, 83–103.

McLaren

IPL

Kaye

Mackintosh

(1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R.G.M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102–130)

Oxford, UK:

Oxford Clarendon Press.

10.

McLaren

IPL

Mackintosh

(2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning and Behavior 28, 211–246.

11.

Mondragón

Hall

(2002). Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavour aversion learning: Evidence for stimulus differentiation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55B, 153–169.

12.

Prados

Hall

Leonard

(2004). Dissociation between the Espinet and perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning. Behavioural Processes 65, 221–229.

13.

Rodriguez

Alonso

(2004). Perceptual learning in flavor-aversion learning: Alternating and blocked preexposure to a compound and to an element of that compound. Learning and Motivation 35, 208–220.

14.

Symonds

Hall

(1995). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation 26, 203–219.