Rats were required to find a submerged platform in the corner of a swimming pool with a distinctive shape. A landmark near the platform did not interfere with the control acquired by the pool's shape over searching for the platform. This outcome was observed with an overshadowing and a blocking design. A comparison of the ease with which the landmark and the pool's shape gained control over searching for the platform indicates that the failure of overshadowing and blocking was not a consequence of the landmark being less salient than the shape of the pool. The results are not readily explained by theories of associative learning, but they are consistent with the claim that learning about the shape of the environment takes place in a dedicated module, which excludes information about the significance of individual landmarks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BieglerR., & MorrisR. G. M. (1999). Blocking in the spatial domain with arrays of discrete landmarks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 341–351.
2.
ChengK. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149–178.
3.
ChengK., & SpetchM. L. (1998). Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. In HealyS. (Ed.), Spatial representation in animals (pp. 1–17). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
DickinsonA.HallG., & MackintoshN.J. (1976). Surprise and the attenuation of blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 313–322.
5.
Diez-ChamizoV.SterioD., & MackintoshN. J. (1985). Blocking and overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues: A test of the independence of locale and guidance learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 235–253.
6.
GallistelC. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
GouteuxS., Thinus-BlancC., & VauclairJ. (2001). Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 505–519.
8.
HallG.MackintoshN. J.GoodallG., & MartelloM. D. (1977). Loss of control by a less valid or by a less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 8, 145–158.
9.
HamiltonD. A., & SutherlandR. J. (1999). Blocking in human place learning: Evidence from virtual navigation. Psychobiology, 27, 453–461.
10.
HermerL., & SpelkeE. (1994). A geometric process for spatial representation in young children. Nature, 370, 57–59.
11.
HermerL., & SpelkeE. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195–232.
12.
Hermer-VazquezL.SpelkeE. S., & KatsnelsonA. S. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3–36.
13.
KaminL. J. (1969). Selective association and conditioning. In MackintoshN. J.HonigW.K. (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 42–64). Halifax, Canada: Dalhousie University Press.
14.
KehoeE. J.SchreursB. G., & AmodeiN. (1981). Blocking acquisition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to serial conditioned stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 12, 92–108.
15.
KellyD. M.SpetchM. L., & HethC. D. (1998). Pigeons (Columba Livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 259–269.
16.
MackintoshN. J. (1973). Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In HindeR. A. & Stevenson-HindeJ. (Eds.), Constraints on learning (75–100). London: Academic Press.
17.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.
18.
MargulesJ., & GallistelR. (1988). Heading in the rat: Determination by environmental shape. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 404–410.
19.
MorrisR. G.M., & SpoonerR. I. W. (1990). Watermaze software [computer software]. Edinburgh, UK: Aztermaze Software.
20.
PearceJ. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607.
21.
PearceJ.M.Ward-RobinsonJ.GoodM.FussellC., & AydinA. (2001). Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 329–344.
22.
RedheadE. S.RobertsA.GoodM., & PearceJ. M. (1997). Interaction between piloting and beacon homing by rats in a swimming pool. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 340–350.
23.
RescorlaR. A., & DurlachP. (1981). Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In SpearN.E. & MillerR.R. (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 81–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24.
RescorlaR. A., & WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In BlackA. H. & ProkasyW. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25.
RobertsA. D. L., & PearceJ.M. (1999). Blocking in the Morris swimming pool. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 225–235.
26.
RodrigoT.ChamizoV. D.McLarenI. P. L., & MackintoshN. J. (1997). Blocking in the spatial domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 110–118.
27.
SovranoA., BisazzaA., & VallortigaraG. (2002). Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: Encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition, 85, 51–59.
28.
SovranoV. A.BisazzaA., & VallortigaraG. (2003). Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: Conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 199–210.
29.
SpetchM. (1995). Overshadowing of landmark learning: Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 166–181.
30.
TommasiL., & VallortigaraG. (2000). Searching for the center: Spatial cognition in the domestic chick. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 477–486.
31.
VallortigaraG.ZanforlinM., & PastiG. (1990). Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: A test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 248–254.
32.
WagnerA. R. (1969). Stimulus validity and stimulus selection in associative learning. In MackintoshN. J. & HonigW. K. (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (90–122). Halifax, Canada: Dalhousie University Press.
33.
WangR. F., & SpelkeE. S. (1999). Mechanisms of reorientation and localization by children: A comparison with rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 475–485.
