In three experiments, humans received preexposure to two compound flavours (AX and BX: saline–lemon and sucrose–lemon) that were presented either in an intermixed (e.g., AX, BX,… BX, AX,…) or a blocked (e.g., AX, AX,… BX, BX…) fashion. Subsequently, AX was paired with an unpleasant bitter taste, and the discriminability of AX and BX was assessed using the accuracy of same/different judgements and by the extent to which any learned dislike of AX generalized to BX. When participants received feedback about the accuracy of their same/different judgements during preexposure those given intermixed preexposure were more accurate in making these judgements during the test than those given blocked preexposure (Experiments 1 and 2A), however, there was no evidence of any learned dislike in these experiments. In Experiment 2B, in which participants did not receive feedback about the accuracy of their judgements, there was no effect of the preexposure regime on same/different judgements, but there was a learned dislike of AX, and this generalized less to BX in participants given intermixed than in those given blocked preexposure. The beneficial effects of intermixed preexposure are consistent with results from other species (chicks and rats), but the differences created by the presence or absence of feedback place constraints on the analysis of these effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenC. T., & JaniszewskiC. A. (1989). Assessing the role of contingency awareness in attitudinal conditioning with implications for advertising research. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 30–43.
2.
ArtigasA.A.ChamizoV. D., & PerisJ. M. (2001). Inhibitory associations between neutral stimuli: A comparative approach. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 46–65.
3.
BaeyensF.CrombezG.DeHouwerJ., & EelenP. (1996). No evidence for modulation of evaluative flavor-flavor associations in humans. Learning and Motivation, 27, 200–241.
4.
BaeyensF.CrombezG.HendrickxH., & EelenP. (1995). Parameters of human evaluative flavor-flavor conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 26, 141–160.
5.
BaeyensF., EelenP., Van den BurghO., & CrombezG. (1990). Flavor-flavor and color-flavor conditioning in humans. Learning and Motivation, 21, 434–455.
6.
BaeyensF.HendrickxH.CrombezG., & HermansD. (1998). Neither extended sequential nor simultaneous feature positive training result in modulation of evaluative flavor-flavor conditioning in humans. Appetite, 31, 185–204.
7.
BaeyensF.HermansD.EelenP., & CrombezG. (1993). Hidden-covariation detection and imagery ability. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 435–456.
8.
BaeyensF.VanhoucheW.CrombezG., & EelenP. (1998). Human evaluative flavor-flavor conditioning is not sensitive to post-acquisition US-inflation. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 83–108.
9.
BennettC. H., & MackintoshN. J. (1999). Comparison and contrast as a mechanism of perceptual learning?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 253–272.
10.
BennettC. H.ScahillV. L.GriffithsD. P., & MackintoshN. J. (1999). The role of inhibitory associations in perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 333–345.
11.
BonardiC.HoneyR. C., & HallG. (1990). Context-specificity of conditioning in flavor-aversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 229–237.
12.
De HouwerJ., ThomasS., & BaeyensF. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853–869.
13.
DwyerD. M.BennettC. H., & MackintoshN. J. (2001). Evidence for inhibitory associations between the unique elements of two compound flavours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 97–109.
14.
DwyerD. M., & MackintoshN. J. (2002). Perceptual learning: Alternating exposure to two compound flavours creates inhibitory associations between their unique features. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 201–207.
EspinetA.IraolaJ. A.BennettC. H., & MackintoshN. J. (1995). Inhibitory associations between neutral stimuli in flavor-aversion conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 361–368.
17.
FahleM. (2002). Introduction. In FahleM.PoggioT. (Eds.), Perceptual learning (pp. ix–xx). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
18.
FahleM., & PoggioT. (2002). Perceptual learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
FulcherE. P., & HammerlM. (2001). When all is revealed: A dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 524–549.
20.
GibsonE. J. (1963). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 29–56.
21.
GibsonE. J. (1969). Principals of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.
22.
GrahamS. (1999). Retrospective revaluation and inhibitory associations: Does perceptual learning modulate our perception of the contingencies between events?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 159–185.
23.
HallG. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
24.
HammerlM., & GrabitzH.-J. (2000). Affective-evaluative learning in humans: A form of associative learning or artifact?Learning and Motivation, 31, 345–363.
25.
HoneyR.C., & BatesonP. (1996). Stimulus comparison and perceptual learning: Some further evidence and evaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 259–269.
26.
HoneyR. C., BatesonP., & HornG. (1994). The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: An investigation with the domestic chick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 83–103.
27.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology. Oxford, UK: Holt.
28.
MackintoshN. J.KayeH., & BennettC. H. (1991). Perceptual learning in flavour aversion conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 297–322.
29.
McLarenI. P. L.KayeH., & MackintoshN. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In MorrisR. G. M. (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (102–130). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
30.
McLarenI. P. L., & MackintoshN. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211–246.
31.
MondragónE., & HallG. (2002). Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavour aversion learning: Evidence for stimulus differentiation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 153–169.
32.
PostmanL. (1955). Association theory and perceptual learning. Psychological Review, 62, 438–446.
33.
RozinP.WrzesniewskiA., & ByrnesD. (1998). The elusiveness of evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 29, 397–415.
34.
SaksidaL. M. (1999). Effects of similarity and experience on discrimination learning: A nonassociative connectionist model of perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 305–323.
35.
ShimpT. A.StuartE. W., & EngleR. W. (1991). A program of classical conditioning experiments testing variations on the conditioned stimulus and context. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 1–12.
36.
SutherlandN. S., & MackintoshN. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. News York: Academic Press.
37.
SymondsM., & HallG. (1995). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common elements. Learning and Motivation, 26, 203–219.
