The Interaction between Discriminative Stimuli and Outcomes during Instrumental Learning

Abstract

Rats were trained on a biconditional discrimination in which the delivery of a food pellet stimulus signalled that pressing on one of two levers would be reinforced, whereas the delivery of a sucrose solution stimulus signalled that the reward was contingent on pressing the other lever. The outcome was the same food type as the discriminative stimulus in the congruent group but the other food type in the incongruent group. Both responses were rewarded with the same outcome in the same group. All the three groups learned the discrimination at statistically indistinguishable rates. Prefeeding one of the outcomes selectively reduced the associated response thereby demonstrating that responding was mediated by a representation of the outcome. Moreover, the outcome of one trial controlled responding on the next trial in accord with the stimulus function of the food type. These results are discussed in relation to the associative structures mediating the discriminative control of instrumental performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asratyan

E. A.

(1974). Conditioned reflex theory and motivational behavior. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 34, 15–31.

Balleine

Dickinson

(1998). The role of incentive learning in instrumental outcome revaluation by sensoryspecific satiety. Animal Learning and Behavior 26, 46–59.

Colwill

R. M.

(1994). Associative representations of instrumental contingencies. The psychology of learning and motivation. Medin

D. L.

New York: Academic Press Vol. 31, 1–72.

Colwill

R. M.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1986). Associative structures in instrumental learning. The psychology of learning and motivation. Bower

G. H.

New York: Academic Press Vol. 20, 55–104.

Dickinson

(1980). Contemporary animal learning theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dickinson

Adams

C. D.

(1980). Preventing overshadowing and the acquisition of discriminative control Unpublished manuscript.

Dickinson

Dawson

G. R.

(1987). The role of the instrumental contingency in the motivational control of performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 39B, 77–93.

Goddard

M. J.

Holland

P. C.

(1997). The effects of feature identity in operant serial feature-negative discriminations. Learning and Motivation 28, 577–608.

Hull

C. L.

(1943). Principles of behavior New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

10.

Jenkins

H. M.

Harrison

R. H.

(1960). Effects of discrimination training on auditory generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 59, 246–253.

11.

Konorski

(1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Mackintosh

N. J.

Dickinson

(1979). Instrumental (Type II) conditioning. Mechanism of learning an motivation. Dickinson

Boakes

R. A.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 143–169.

13.

Thorndike

E. L.

(1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies New York: Macmillan.

14.

Trapold

M. A.

(1970). Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different?. Learning and Motivation 1, 129–140.

15.

Trapold

M. A.

Overmier

J. B.

(1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. Black

A. H.

Prokasy

W. F.

New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 427–452.

16.

Wagner

A. R.

(1969). Stimulus validity and stimulus selection in associative learning. Fundamental issues in associative learning. Mackintosh

N. J.

Honig

W. K.

Halifax, Canada: Dalhousie University Press 90–122.