Over the past 20 years, human contingency learning has resurfaced as an important topic within experimental psychology. This renewed interest was sparked mainly by the proposal that associative models of Pavlovian conditioning might also apply to human contingency learning—a proposal that has led to many new empirical findings and theoretical developments. We provide a brief review of these recent developments and try to point to issues that need to be addressed in future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AitkenM. R. F.LarkinM. J. W.DickinsonA. (2001). Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54B, 27–51.
2.
AndersonJ. R.SheuC-F. (1995). Causal inferences as perceptual judgments.Memory and Cognition23, 510–524.
3.
BlaisdellA. P.BristolA. S.GuntherL. M.MillerR. R. (1998). Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: Support for the comparator hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes24, 335–351.
4.
CatenaA.MaldonadoA.CándidoA. (1998). The effect of the frequency of judgement and the type of trials on covariation learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 481–495.
5.
ChapmanG. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17, 837–854.
6.
ChengP. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review104, 367–405.
7.
ChengP. W.HolyoakK. J. (1995). Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction.Comparative approaches to cognition.MeyerJ.-A.RoitblatH.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press271–302.
8.
ChengP. W.NovickL. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58, 545–567.
9.
ChengP. W.NovickL. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction.Psychological Review99, 365–382.
10.
De HouwerJ. (2002). Forward blocking depends on retrospective inferences about the presence of the blocked cue during the elemental phase.Memory & Cognition30, 24–33.
11.
De HouwerJ.SeekersT. (2002a). Second-order backward blocking and unovershadowing in human causal learning.Experimental Psychology49, 27–33.
12.
De HouwerJ.DeckersT. (2002b). Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology555, 137–151.
13.
De HouwerJ.DeckersT.GbutierS. (2002). Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55A, 965–985.
DennistonJ. C.SavastanoH. I.MillerR. R. (2001). The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength.Handbook of contemporary learning theories.MowrerR. R.KleinS. B.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc65–117.
16.
DickinsonA. (2001). The 28th Bartlett memorial lecture: Causal learning: An associative analysis.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54B, 3–25.
17.
DickinsonA.BurkeJ. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology49B, 60–80.
18.
DickinsonA.ShanksD.EvendenJ. (1984). Judgement of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology36A, 29–50.
19.
EvansJ. St. B. T.OverD. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoningHove, UK: Psychology Press.
20.
GlautierS. (2002). Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55B, 121–136.
HogarthR. M.EinhornJ. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: the belief-adjustment model.Cognitive Psychology24, 1–55.
23.
HumeD. (1987). A treatise of human nature. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press Original work published 1739.
24.
KaminL. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning.Punishment and aversive behavior.ChurchR. M.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts279–296.
25.
KantI. (1965). Critique of pure reasonLondon: Macmillan Original work published 1781.
26.
KilleenP. R. (2001). The four causes of behavior.Current Directions in Psychological Science10, 136–140.
27.
KruschkeJ. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.Psychological Review99, 22–44.
28.
KruschkeJ. K.BlairN. J. (2001). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention.Psychological Bulletin and Review7, 636–645.
29.
LarkinM. J. W.AitkenM. R. F.DickinsonA. (1998). Retrospective revaluation of causal judgements under positive and negative contingencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition24, 1331–1352.
30.
Le PelleyM. E.McLarenH. L. (2001). Retrospective revaluation in humans: Learning or memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54B, 311–352.
31.
LienY.ChengP. W. (2000). Distinguishing genuine from spurious causes: A coherence hypothesis.Cognitive Psychology40, 87–137.
32.
LoberK.ShanksD. R. (2000). Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997).Psychological Review107, 195–212.
33.
LopezF. J.AlmarazJ.FernandezP.ShanksD. R. (1999). Adquisicion progresiva del conocimiento sobre relackmes predictivas: Curvas de aprendizaje en juicios de contingenda [Gradual acquisition of knowledge of predictive relationships: Learning curves in contingency judgments].Psicothema11, 337–349.
34.
LopezF. J.ShanksD. R.AlmarazJ.FernandezP. (1998). Effects of trial order on contingency judgements: A comparison of associative and probabilistic contrast accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, and Cognition24, 672–694.
35.
LovibondF. F.BeenS.-L.MitchellC. J.BoutonM. E.FrohardtR. (2001). Forward and backward blocking of causaljudgement is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude Manuscript submitted for publication.
36.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variation in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 276–298.
37.
MackintoshN. J. (1995). Categorization by people and pigeons: The twenty-second Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology48B, 193–214.
38.
MarkmanA. B. (1989). LMS rules and the inverse base-rate effect: Comment on Gluck and Bower (1988).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118, 417–421.
39.
MarrD. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual informationSan Francisco: Freeman.
40.
MatuteH.PinenoO. (1998). Cue competition in the absence of compound training: Its relation to paradigms of interference between outcomes.The psychology of learning and motivation.MedinD. L.San Diego, CA: Academic PressVol. 38, 45–81.
41.
MatuteH.PinenoO. (1998b). Stimulus competition in the absence of compound conditioning.Animal Learning & Behavior26, 3–14.
42.
McLarenI. P. L.GreenR. E A.MackintoshN. J. (1994). Animal learning and the implicit/explicit distinction.Implicit and explicit learning of languages.EllisN. C.New York: Academic Press313–332.
43.
MichotteA. (1954). La perception de la causalitéLeuven, Belgium: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.
44.
MillerR. R.EscobarM. (2001). Contrasting acquisition-focused and performance-focused models of acquired behavior.Current Directions m Psychological Science10, 141–145.
45.
MillerR. R.MatzelL. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations.The psychology of learning and motivation.BowerG. H.San Diego, CA: Academic PressVol. 22, 51–92.
46.
MillerR. R.SchachtmanT. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition.Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition.MillerR. R.SpearN. E.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc51–88.
47.
MitchellC. J.LovibondF. F. (2002). Backward and forward blocking in human autonomie conditioning requires an assumption of outcome additivity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55B, 311–329.
48.
PearceJ. M. (1987). A model for stimulus-generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review94, 61–73.
49.
PearceJ. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination-A selective review and a connectionist model.Psychological Review101, 587–607.
50.
PeralesJ. C.ShanksD. R. (2001). Normative accuracy of regularity-based causal estimation in one-cause one-outcome learning situations: Effects of contingency and causal power Manuscript submitted for publication.
51.
PinenoO.OrtegaN.MatuteH. (2000). The relative activation of the associations modulates interference between elementally-trained cues.Learning and Motivation31, 128–152.
52.
RescorlaR. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology66, 1–5.
53.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F.New York: Appleton64–99.
54.
RevuskyS.GarciaJ. (1970). Learned associations over long delays.The psychology of learning and motivation.BowerG. H.SpenceJ. T.New York: Academic PressVol. 4, 1–77.
55.
ShanksD. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement.Quarterly-Journal of Experimental Psychology37B, 1–21.
56.
ShanksD. R. (1987). Acquisition functions in causality judgement.Learning and Motivation18, 147–166.
57.
ShanksD. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learningCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
ShanksD. R.CharlesD.DarbyR. J.AziniA. (1998). Configural processes in human associative learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition24, 1353–1378.
59.
ShanksD. R.DarbyR. J. (1998). Feature-and rule-based generalization in human associative learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes24, 405–415.
60.
The psychology of learning and motivation; Vol. 43, Causal learning.ShanksD. R.HolyoakK. L.MedinD. L.San Diego, CA: Academic Press1996.
61.
ShanksD. R.LopezF. L.DarbyR. J.DickinsonA. (1996). Distinguishing associative and probabilistic contrast theories of human contingency judgement.The psychology of learning and motivation.ShanksD. R.HolyoakK. J.MedinD. L.San Diego, CA: Academic PressVol. 34, 265–311.
62.
TestaT. J. (1974). Causal relationship and the acquisition of avoidance responses.Psychological Review78, 3–43.
63.
Van HammeL. L.WassermanE. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgements: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements.Learning and Motivation25, 127–151.
64.
Van OverwalleF.Van RooyD. (2001). When more observations are better than less: A connectionist account of the acquisition of causal strength.European Journal of Social Psychology31, 155–175.
65.
WagnerA. R. (1981). SOP. A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior.Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms.SpearN. E.MillerR. R.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc5–47.
66.
WagnerA. R.BrandonS. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning.Handbook of contemporary learning theories.MowrerR. U.KleinS. B.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc23–64.
67.
WaldmannM. R. (2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 53–76.
68.
WaldmannM. R. (2001). Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review8, 600–608.
69.
WaldmannM. R.HolyoakK. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General121, 22–236.
70.
WassermanE. A.BerglanL. R. (1998). Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: The role of within-compound associations.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology51B, 121–138.
71.
WhiteP. A. (2000). Causal judgement from contingency information: Relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgement.Memory and Cognition28, 415–426.
72.
WhiteP. A. (2002). Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: Further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55A, 97–114.
73.
WilliamsD. A.SagnessK. E.McPheeJ. E. (1994). Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20, 694–709.
