The main aim of this research was to study the cognitive architecture underlying causal/covariation learning by investigating the frequency of judgement effect. Previous research has shown that decreasing the number of trials between opportunities to make a judgement in a covariation learning task led to a higher score after an a or d type of trial (positive cases) than after b and c trials (negative cases). Experiment 1 replicated this effect using a trial-by-trial procedure and examined the conditions under which it occurs. Experiment 2 demonstrated a similar frequency of judgement effect when the information was presented in the form of contingency tables. Associative or statistical single-mechanism accounts of causal and covariation learning do not provide a satisfactory explanation for these findings. An alternative belief revision model is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhnG.KalishC. K.MedinD. L.GelmanS. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution.Cognition54, 299–352.
2.
AllanL. G. (1993). Human contingency judgements: Rule based or associative?.Psychological Bulletin114, 435–448.
3.
CatenaA.MaldonadoA.CándidoA. (1998). The effect of frequency of judgement and the type of trials on covariation learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 481–495.
4.
ChapmanG. B.RobbinsS. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgement.Memory and Cognition18, 537–545.
5.
ChengP. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review104, 367–405.
6.
DickinsonA.BurkeJ. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Compara live and Physiological Psychology49B, 60–80.
7.
LoberK.ShanksD. R. (2000). Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997).Psychological Remap107, 195–312.
8.
MaldonadoA.CatenaA.CándidoA.GarcíaI. (1999). The belief revision model: Asymmetrical effects of noncontingency in human covariation learning.Animal Learning & Behavior27, 168–180.
9.
MarkmanA. B. (1989). LMS rules and the inverse base-rate effect: Comment on Gluck and Bower (1988).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118, 411–421.
10.
OverD. E.GreenD. W. (2001). Contingency, causation, and adaptive inference.Psychological Review108, 682–684.
11.
PenningtonN.HastieR. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology62, 189–206.
12.
PriceP. C.YatesJ. F. (1995). Associative and rule-based accounts of cue interaction in contingency judgement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21, 1639–1655.
13.
ReedP. (1994). Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgements.Memory and Cognition22, 243–248.
14.
ShanksD. R. (1985). Continuous monitoring of human contingency judgement across trials.Memory and Cognition8, 459–467.
15.
ShanksD. R. (1987). Acquisition functions in contingency judgement.Learning and Motivation18, 147–166.
16.
ShanksD. R. (1991). On similarities between causal judgements in experienced and described situations.Psychological Science2, 341–350.
17.
ShanksD. R. (1993). Human instrumental learning: A critical review of data and theory.British Journal of Psychology84, 319–354.
18.
ShanksD. R.DarbyR. J.CharlesD. (1998). Resistance to interference in human associative learning: Evidence of configural processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes24, 136–150.
19.
The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning.ShanksD. R.HolyoakK. J.MedinD. L.San Diego, CA: Academic Press1996.
20.
Van HammeL. J.WassermanE. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgements: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements.Learning and Motivation25, 127–151.
21.
WaldmannM. R. (1996). Knowledge-based causal induction.The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Casual learning.ShanksD. R.HolyoakK. J.MedinD. L.San Diego, CA: Academic Press47–88.
22.
WaldmannM. R.HolyoakK. J.FratianneA. (1995). Causal models and the acquisition of category structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General124, 2181–206.
23.
WassermanE. A.BerglanL. R. (1998). Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human and causal judgement: The role of within-compound associations.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology51B, 121–138.
24.
WhiteP. A. (2000). Causal judgement from contingency information: The interpretation of factors common to all instances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 1083–1102.
