Extinction of conditioned taste aversions was examined as a function of taste concentration and of the presence of an additional taste. The results of Experiment 1 were consistent with previous evidence in that a conditioned aversion to high concentration saline was more persistent in extinction than an aversion to a low concentration. However, when floor effects were avoided the rate of extinction was faster for the higher (1%) concentration than for 0.2% saline (Experiment 2), a result consistent with accounts of extinction in other preparations. Three further experiments examined extinction of a conditioned sucrose aversion. The addition of 1% saline, but not of 0.2% saline, to sucrose during extinction produced overshadowing (“protection from extinction”; Experiment 3). Such overshadowing by saline was detected after two, but not after a single extinction trial (Experiment 4). This last finding suggests that under the conditions of the present experiments sweet and salty tastes function as elemental stimuli competing for loss of associative strength. No overshadowing was found when almond (an aqueous odour) was used in place of saline as the added stimulus, even when high concentrations of almond were used that produced observable neophobia (Experiments 5A and 5B).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarkerL. M. (1976). CS duration, amount, and concentration effects in conditioning taste aversions.Learning and Motivation7, 265–273.
2.
BaumM.JacobsW. J. (1989). Loud noise potentiates conditioned fear in extinction using a CER (lick suppression) paradigm in rats.Bulletin of the Psychoaomic Society27, 5449–451.
3.
BevinsR. A.JensenH. A.HinzeT. S.BesheerJ. (1999). Taste quality and extinction of a conditioned taste aversion in rats.Animal Learning and Behavior27, 358–366.
4.
BoakesR. A.WestbrookR. F.ElliottM.SwinbourneA. L. (1997). Context dependency of conditioned aversions to water and sweet tastes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes23, 156–67.
5.
CallonJ. L.MitchellK. G.SchachtmanT. R. (1996). Conditioned inhibition produced by extinction of a conditioned stimulus.Learning and Motivation27, 335–361.
6.
DennistonJ. C.SavastanoH J.MillerR. R. (2001). The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength.Handbook of contemporary learning theories.MowrerR. R.KleinS. B.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc65–117.
7.
DeutschJ. A.JonesA. D. (1960). Diluted water: An explanation of the rat's preference for saline.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology53, 122–127.
8.
DickinsonA.MackintoshN. J. (1978). Classical conditioning in animals.Annual Revient of Psychology29, 587–612.
9.
DomjanM. (1985). Cue-consequence specificity and long-delay learning revisited.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences443, 54–66.
10.
DragoinW. B. (1971). Conditioning and extinction of taste aversions with variations in intensity of the CS and UCS in two strains of rats.Psychonomic Science22, 5303–305.
11.
GarciaJ.KoellingR. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science4, 123–124.
12.
HarrisJ. A.ShandF.CarrollL.WestbrookR. F. (2002). Extinction of conditioned flavour preferences Manuscript submitted for publication.
13.
JamesJ. H.WagnerA. R. (1980). One-trial overshadowing: Evidence of distributive processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes6, 2188–205.
14.
LaingD. G.LinkC.JinksA. L.HutchinsonI. (2002). The limited capacity of humans to identify the components of taste mixtures and taste odour mixtures Manuscript submitted for publication.
15.
LoLordoV. M.DroungasA. (1989). Selective associations and adaptive specializations: Taste aversions and phobias.Contemporary learning theories: Instrumental conditioning theory and the impact of biological constraints on learning.KleinS. B.MowrerR. R.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc145–179.
16.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variation in the assodability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 4276–298.
17.
MackintoshN. J.ReeseB. (1979). One-trial overshadowing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology31, 519–526.
18.
McLarenI. P. L.MackintoshN. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning.Animal Learning & Behavior28, 3211–246.
19.
NowlisG. H. (1974). Conditioned stimulus intensity and acquired alimentary aversions in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology86, 61173–1184.
20.
PearceJ. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalisation in Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review94, 161–73.
21.
PearceJ. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model.Psychological Review101, 4587–607.
22.
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review87, 6532–552.
23.
RescorlaR. A. (2001). Experimental extinction.Handbook of contemporary learning theories.MowrerR. R.KleinS. B.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc119–154.
24.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Classical conditioning II. Current research and theory.BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F.New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts64–99.
25.
RevuskyS. (1971). The role of interference in association over a delay.Animal memory.HonigW. K.JamesP. H. R.New York, NY: Academic Press155–213.
26.
RusiniakK. W.PalmerinoC. C.GarciaJ. (1982). Potentiation of odor by taste in rats: Tests of some nonassociauve factors.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology96, 775–780.
27.
SchachtmanT. R.KasprowW. J.MeyerR. C.BourneM. J.HartJ. A. (1992). Extinction of the overshadowing CS after overshadowing in conditioned taste aversion.Animal Learning and Behavior20, 3207–218.
28.
StevensonR. J.BoakesR. A.PrescottJ. (1998). Changes in odor sweetness resulting from implicit learning of a simultaneous odor sweetness association: An example of learned synesthesia.Learning and Motivation29, 113–132.
29.
SutherlandN. S.MackintoshN. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learningLondon: Academic Press.
30.
SymondsM.HallG. (1999). Overshadowing not potentiation of illness-based contextual conditioning by a novel taste.Animal Learning and Behavior27, 4379–390.
31.
WagnerA. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior.Information processing in animai: Memory mechanisms.SpearN. E.MillerR. R.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc5–47.
32.
WagnerA. R.RescorlaR. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory.Inhibition and learning.BoakesR. A.HallidayM. S.London: Academic Press301–336.
