Analysis of the Perceptual Learning Effect in Flavour Aversion Learning: Evidence for Stimulus Differentiation

Abstract

Rats received exposure to two compound flavours, AX and BX, where A and B were sucrose and saline and X was acid. For group intermixed (I), exposure consisted of alternating trials with AX and BX; group blocked (B) received a block of AX trials and a separate block of BX trials. Experiment 1 showed that generalization to BX after conditioning with AX was less profound in group I than in group B. Separate examination of the elements of the compound showed that the source of this difference lay in the strength acquired by the X element. X acquired less strength in group I than in group B (Experiments 1 and 2), whereas for the A element (Experiments 3 and 4) the reverse pattern was obtained. These results support the proposal that the perceptual learning effect (restricted generalization from AX to BX in group I) depends on a process that enhances the effectiveness of unique stimulus elements (A and B) and reduces that of common elements (such as X).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett

C. H.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1999). Comparison and contrast as a mechanism of perceptual learning?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52B, 253–272.

Bennett

C. H.

Scahill

V. L.

Griffiths

D. P.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1999). The role of inhibitory associations in perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 27, 333–345.

Gibson

E. J.

(1969). Principles of perceptual learning ana development New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Hall

(1991). Perceptual and associative learning Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hall

(1996). Learning about associativety activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 24, 233–255.

Honey

R. C.

Bateson

(1996). Stimulus comparison and perceptual learning: Further evidence and evaluaton from an imprinting procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49B, 259–269.

Honey

R. C.

Bateson

Horn

(1994). The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: An investigation with the domestic chick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47B, 83–103.

Honey

R. C.

Hall

(1989). Enhanced discriminability and reduced associability following flavour preexposure. Learning and Motivation 20, 262–277.

Mackintosh

N. J.

Kaye

Bennett

C. H.

(1991). Perceptual learning in flavour aversion conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 43B, 297–322.

10.

McLaren

I. P. L.

Kaye

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology. Morris

R. G. M.

Oxford: Clarendon Press 102–130.

11.

McLaren

I. P. L.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 28, 211–246.

12.

Pearce

J. M.

Hall

(1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variation in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review 87, 532–552.

13.

Rescorla

R. A.

Cunningham

C. L.

(1978). Within-compound flavor associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 4, 267–275.

14.

Rescorla

R. A.

Wagner

A. R.

(1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. Black

A. H.

Prokasy

W. F.

New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 64–99.

15.

Symonds

Hall

(1995). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion conditioning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation 26, 203–219.

16.

Symonds

Hall

(1997). Stimulus preexposure, comparison, and changes in the associability of common stimulus features. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50B, 317–331.

17.

Wagner

A. R.

(1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms. Spear

N. E.

Miller

R. R.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 5–47.