Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Male and female rats were gonadectomized, implanted in adulthood with capsules containing either testosterone propionate (TP) or cholesterol, and were trained to lever press for access to an oestrous female. When lever press performance was tested in extinction, only the male rats implanted with TP displayed significantly higher levels of responding than controls, demonstrating that lever pressing for oestrous females as a reward is sexually dimorphic. Ejaculation patterns from a separate assessment of these rats’ copulatory ability were significantly correlated with their instrumental performance. In a second experiment, “masculinized” females exposed to TP postnatally and given TP implants responded in extinction at mean levels equivalent to those exhibited by adult males that were either intact or castrated with androgen replacement. These data suggest that organizational steroid exposure perinatally affects the actual reward value assigned to oestrous females inadulthood, in combination withconsummatory sexual experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balleine

B. W.

(1992). Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 18, 3 236–250.

Balleine

B. W.

(2000). Incentive processes in instrumental conditioning. Handbook of contempory learning theories. Mowrer

Klein

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 307–366.

Balleine

B. W.

Ball

Dickinson

(1994). Benzodiazepine-induced outcome revaluation and the motivational control of instrumental action. Behavioral Neuroscience 108, 573–589.

Balleine

B. W.

Dickinson

(1991). Instrumental performance following reinforcer devaluation depends upon incentive learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 43B, 279–296.

Balleine

B. W.

Dickinson

(1992). Signaling and incentive processes in instrumental reinforcer devaluatioan. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45B, 285–301.

Balleine

B. W.

Dickinson

(1998). The role of incentive learning in instrumental outcome revaluation by sensory-specific satiety. Animal Learning & Behavior 26, 46–59.

Beach

F. A.

(1945). Bisexual mating behavior in the male rat Effects of castration and hormone administration. Physiological Zoology 18, 390–402.

Beach

F. A.

Fowler

(1959). Individual differences in the response of male rats to androgen. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 52, 50–52.

Beach

F. A.

Levinson

(1950). Effects ofandrogen on the glans penis and mating behavior of castrated male rats. Journal of Experimental Zoology 114, 159–171.

10.

Beach

F. A.

Noble

R. G.

Orndoff

R. K.

(1969). Effects of perinatal androgen treatment on responses of male rats to gonadal hormones in adulthood. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology 68, 490–497.

11.

Cruz-Cassales

P. E.

Feliao

L. F.

Nasello

A. G.

(2000). A quantitative analysis of the role of experience in the regulation of sexual behavior in male rats. Psychobiology 28, 406–410.

12.

Dickinson

Balleine

B. W.

(1994). Motivational control of goal-directed action. Animal Learning & Behavior 22, 1–18.

13.

Everitt

B. J.

(1990). Sexual motivation: A neural and behavioural analysis of the mechanisms underlying appetitive and copulatory responses of male rats. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 14, 217–232.

14.

Everitt

B. J.

Fray

Kostarczyk

Taylor

Stacey

(1987). Studies of instrumental behavior with sexual reinforcement in male rats (Rattus norvegicus): 1. Control by brief visual stimuli paired with a receptive female. Journal of Comparative Psychology 101, 395–406.

15.

Everitt

B. J.

Stacey

(1987). Studies of instrumental behavior with sexual reinforcement in male rats (Rattus norvegicus): II. Effects of preoptic area lesions, castration, and testosterone. Journal of Comparative Psychology 101, 407–419.

16.

Gorski

R. A.

(1967). Localization of the neural control of luteinization in the feminine male rat (FALE). Anatomical Record 157, 1 63–69.

17.

Larsson

(1966). Individual differences in reactivity to androgen in male rats. Physiology & Behavior 1, 255–258.

18.

Lopez

Balleine

B. W.

Dickinson

(1992). Incentive learning and the motivational control of instrumental performance by thirst. Animal Learning & Behavior 20, 4 322–328.

19.

Lopez

Paredes-Olay

(1999). Sensitivity of instrumental responses to an upshift in water deprivation. Animal Learning & Behavior 27, 280–287.

20.

Sachs

B. D.

Pollak

E. I.

Krieger

M. S.

Barfield

R. J.

(1973). Sexual behavior: Normal male patterning in androgenized female rats. Science 181, 770–772.

21.

Sachs

B. D.

Thomas

D. A.

(1985). Differential effects of perinatal androgen treatment on sexually dimorphic characteristics in rats. Physiology & Behavior 34, 735–742.

22.

Sheffield

F. D.

Wulff

J. J.

Backer

(1951). Reward value of copulation without sex drive reduction. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 44, 3–9.

23.

Ward

(1969). Differential effect of pre- and postnatal androgen on the sexual behavior of intact and spayed rats. Hormones and Behavior 1, 25–36.

24.

Woodson

J. C.

Gorski

R. A.

(2000). Structural sex differences in the mammalian brain: Reconsidering the male/ female dichotomy. Sexual differentiation of the brain. Matsumoto

Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press 229–255Chap. 13.

An Assessment of Factors Contributing to Instrumental Performance for Sexual Reward in the Rat

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References