Three lexical decision experiments in French investigated the effects of briefly presented forward-masked non-word primes on latencies to phonologically and/or orthographically related targets. At 64-msec prime presentation durations, primes that are pseudohomophones of the target produced facilitatory effects compared to orthographic controls, but these orthographically similar non-word primes did not facilitate target recognition compared to unrelated controls. These results were obtained independently of target word frequency and independently of the presence or absence of pseudohomophone targets in the experimental lists. With a 32-msec prime duration, on the other hand, pseudohomophone and orthographic primes had similar effects on target recognition, both producing facilitation relative to unrelated controls. The results are discussed in terms of the time course of phonological and orthographic code activation in the processing of pronounceable strings of letters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronJ. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology25, 241–246.
2.
ColtheartM.DavelaarE.JonassonJ. T.BesnerD. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and Performance VI.DornicS.London: Academic Press535–555.
3.
DavelaarE.ColtheartM.BesnerD.JonassonJ. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory and Cognition6, 391–402.
4.
EvettL. J.HumphreysG. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology33A, 325–350.
5.
ForsterK. I.DavisC. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition10, 680–698.
6.
ForsterK. I.DavisC.SchoknechtC.CarterR. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology39, 211–251.
7.
GraingerJ. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language29, 228–244.
8.
HumphreysG. W.EvettL. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual route theory of reading. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences8, 689–740.
9.
HumpnreysG. W.EvettL. J.TaylorD. E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition10, 128–152.
10.
HumphreysG. W.EvettL. J.QuinlanP. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology22, 517–560.
11.
JacobsA. M.GraingerJ.Testing a semi-stochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance(in press).
12.
LukatelaG.CarelloC.TurveyM. T. (1990a). Phonemic, associative, and grammatical context effects with identified and unidentified primes. Language and Speech33, 1–18.
13.
LukatelaG.CarelloC.TurveyM. T. (1990b). Phonemic priming with words and pseudowords. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology2, 375–394.
14.
LukatelaG.TurveyM. T. (1990a). Automatic and pre-lexical computation of phonology in visual word identification. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology2, 325–343.
15.
LukatelaG.TurveyM. T. (1990b). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory and Cognition18, 128–152.
16.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review88, 375–405.
17.
MeyerD. E.SchvaneveldtR. W.RudyM. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition2, 309–321.
18.
NaishP. (1980). The effects of graphemic and phonemic similarity between targets and masks in a backward visual masking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology32, 57–68.
19.
PerfettiC. A.BellL. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language30, 473–485.
20.
PerfettiC. A.BellL. C.DelaneyS. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language27, 59–70.
21.
PerfettiC. A.ZhangS. (1991). Phonemic processes in reading Chinese words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition1, 633–643.
22.
RubensteinH.LewisS. S.RubensteinM. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior10, 645–657.
23.
RumelhartD. E.McClellandJ. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review89, 60–94.
24.
SeidenbergM. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition19, 1–30.
25.
SerenoJ. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asyncrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17, 459–477.
26.
Trésor de la langue francaiseNancy: C.N.R.S.1971.
27.
Van OrdenG. C. (1987). A Rows is a Rose: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory and Cognition15, 181–198.
28.
Van OrdenG. C.JohnstonJ. C.HaleB. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition14, 371–386.
29.
WatersG. S.SeidenbergM. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory and Cognition13, 557–572.
