This study examines the effect of the availability of a dynamic model on the acquisition of a complex cyclical action: slalom-type ski movements on a ski-simulator. A two-condition design was used, with N = 20 subjects per condition. In the experimental condition subjects had, during training trials, the benefit of the availability of a dynamic (video) model of an expert performer, while subjects in the control condition were left entirely to “discovery learning”. The dependent variables were the amplitude, frequency and fluency of the movement of the ski-simulator platform on which subjects were required to stand in operating the simulator. Movement characteristics of the platform were recorded by means of a microcomputer (Apple II+) coupled to a Selcom 403 camera (SELSPOT system). Subjects having the benefit of a dynamic model during training were shown, at the end of the five-day training period, to produce more fluent movements (of the platform) and to show greater consistency of fluency and of tempo than subjects left entirely to discovery learning. The results are discussed in the context of theories of perception and of motor learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theoryEnglewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
2.
BanduraA.MischelW. (1965). Modification of self-imposed delay of reward through exposure to live and symbolic models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology2, 698–705.
3.
BijlardM. J. (1984). De rolvan imitatie bij het leven bewegen op een ski-simulator Unpublished Master's degree thesis. Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
4.
BootsmaR. J.den BrinkerB. P. L. M.WhitingH. T. A. (1986). Complexe bewegingshandelingen op sportgebied. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologies41, 14–26.
5.
CarrollW. R.BanduraA. (1982). The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: Making the unobservable observable. Journal of Motor Behavior14, 153–167.
6.
CuttingJ. E. (1978). Generation of synthetic male and female walkers through the manipulation of a biomechanical invariant. Perception7, 393–405.
7.
CuttingJ. E. (1981). Six tenets for event perception. Cognition10, 71–78.
8.
CuttingJ. E. (1983). Four assumptions about invariance in perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9, 310–317.
9.
CuttingJ. E.KozlowskiL. (1977). Recognising friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society9, 353–356.
10.
CuttingJ. E.ProfittD. R. (1981). Gait perception as an example of how we may perceive events. WalkR. D.PickH. L.Intersensory perception and sensory integration.New York: Plenum.
11.
den BrinkerB. P. L. M.van HekkenM. F. (1982). The analysis of slalom-ski type movements using a ski-simulator apparatus. Human Movement Science1, 91–108.
12.
den BrinkerB. P. L. M.StäblerJ. R. L. W.WhitingH. T. A.van WieringenP. C. W. (1986). The effect of manipulating knowledge of results on the learning of slalom-type ski movements. Ergonomics29, 31–40.
13.
den BrinkerB. P. L. M.StäblerJ. R. L. W.WhitingH. T. A.van WieringenP. C. W. (1985). A multidimensional analysis of some persistent problems in motor learning. GoodmanD.WilbergR. B.FranksI.Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory and control.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14.
den BrinkerB. P. L. M.StäblerJ.VergeerR. L. W. I. (1983). De relatie tussen het lichaamsgewicht en bewegingstempo bij het bewegen op een ski-simulator Internal report, Department of Psychology, IFLO, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
15.
FeltzD. L.LandersD. M.RaederU. (1979). Enhancing self-efficacy in a high avoidance task: A comparison of modeling techniques. Journal of Sport Psychology1, 112–122.
16.
FittsP. M.PosnerM. I. (1967). Human performanceBelmont: Brooks/Cole.
17.
HopkinsB.PrechtlH. F. R. (1985). Development of the infant's social competence during early face-to-face interaction: A longitudinal study. PrechtlH. F. R.Continuity of neural functions from prenatal to postnatal life.Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
JohanssonG. (1950). Configurations in event perceptionUppsala: Almquist & Wiskell.
19.
JohanssonG. (1973). The visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics14, 201–211.
JordanF. R. (1977). Meaningful motor learning and cognitive structure: The experimental facilitation of imitation learning of a complex task Unpublished M. Ed, thesis, University of Sydney, Australia.
22.
KelsoJ. A. S.TullerB. (1985). A dynamical basis for action systems. GazzanigaM. S.Handbook of cognitive neuroscience.New York: Plenum.
23.
LeesA. (1980). An optimised film analysis method based on finite difference techniques. Journal of Human Movement Studies6, 165–180.
24.
MartensR.BurwitzL.ZuckermanJ. (1976). Modelling effects on motor performance. Research Quarterly47, 227–291.
25.
PribramK. H. (1971). Languages of the brainEnglewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
26.
PrinzW. (1986). Ideo-motor action. HeuerH.SandersA. F.Tutorial on perception and action.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
27.
ReedE. (1982). An outline of a theory of action systems. Journal of Motor Behavior14, 98–134.
28.
RicoeurP. (1966). Freedom and nature: The voluntary and the involuntaryEvanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
29.
SchmidtR. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review82, 225–260.
30.
ShapiroD. C.SchmidtR. A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. KelsoJ. A. S.ClarkJ. E.The development of movement control and coordination.New York: Wiley.
31.
TyldesleyD. A.WhitingH. T. A. (1975). Operational timing. Journal of Human Movement Studies1, 172–177.
32.
ValkP. J. L. (1984). Effecten van oefentempo op de ontwikkeling van de bewegingsvorm bij het aanleren van een groot motorische vaardigheid Doctoral dissertation, Vakgroep Psychologic, IFLO, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
33.
VinckenM. H. (1984). Control of limb stiffness Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
34.
WhitingH. T. A. (1980). Dimensions of control in motor learning. StelmachG. E.RequinJ.Tutorials in motor behavior.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
35.
WhitingH. T. A. (1984). The concepts of adaptation and attunement in skill learning. SelfridgeO. G.RislandE. L.ArbibM. A.Adaptive control of ill-defined systems.New York: Plenum.
36.
WhitingH. T. A.den BrinkerB. P. L. M. (1982). Image of the act. DasJ. P.MulcahyR. F.WallA. E.Theory and research in learning disabilities.New York: Plenum.
37.
WilliamsJ. G. (1985). Movement imitation: Some fundamental processes Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
