Two eye tracking experiments show that, for near launch sites, the eyes land nearer to the beginning of words with orthographically irregular than with regular initial letter sequences. In addition, the characteristics of words, at least at the level of orthography, influence the direction and length of within-word saccades. Importantly, these effects hold both for lower case and for visually less distinctive upper case text. Furthermore, contrary to previous evidence (Tinker & Paterson, 1939), there is little effect of type case on reading times. Additional analyses of oculomotor behaviour suggest that there is an inverted optimal viewing position for single fixation durations on words. Both the supplementary analyses and the effects of orthography on fixation positions are relevant to current models of eye movements in reading.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaayenRHPiepenbrockRGulikersL (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database[CD-ROM] Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2.
BeauvillainCDoréK (1998). Orthographic codes are used in integrating information from the parafovea by the saccadic computation system.Vision Research38, 115–123.
3.
BeauvillainCDoréKBaudouinV (1996). The “centre of gravity” of words: Evidence for an effect of word-initial letters.Vision Research36, 589–603.
4.
BeckerWJürgensR (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli.Vision Research19, 967–983.
5.
BertramRHyönäJ (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds.Journal of Memory and Language48, 615–634.
6.
DeutschARaynerK (1999). Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words.Language and Cognitive Processes14, 393–421.
7.
DoréKBeauvillainC (1997). Latency dependence of word-initial letter integration by the saccadic system.Perception & Psychophysics59, 523–533.
8.
Dunn-RankinP (1978). The visual characteristics of words.Scientific American238, 122–130.
9.
EngbertRLongtinAKlieglR (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing.Vision Research42, 621–636.
10.
HyönäJ (1993). Eye movements during reading and discourse processing(Psychological Research Rep. No. 65) Turku, Finland:University of Turku.
11.
HyönäJ (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 68–81.
12.
HyönäJPollatsekA (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 1612–1627.
13.
HyönäJPollatsekA (2000). Processing of Finnish compound words in reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process(pp. 65–87)Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
14.
InhoffAWRaynerK (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency.Perception & Psychophysics40, 431–439.
15.
InhoffAWStarrMShindlerKL (2000). Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?.Perception & Psychophysics62, 1474–1484.
16.
KennedyA (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade off. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception(pp. 149–179)Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
17.
KennedyA (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology53A, 429–455.
18.
KennisonSMCliftonC (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21, 68–81.
19.
LavigneFVituFd'YdewalleG (2000). The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words.Acta Psychologica104, 191–214.
20.
LimaSDInhoffAW (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word initial letter sequence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance11, 272–285.
21.
LiversedgeSPFindlayJM (2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences4, 6–14.
22.
LiversedgeSPUnderwoodG (1998). Foveal processing load and landing position effects in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception(pp. 201–221)Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
23.
LiversedgeSPWhiteSJ (2003). Psycholinguistic processes affect fixation durations and orthographic information affects fixation locations: Can E-Z Reader cope?.Behavioral and Brain Sciences26, 492–493.
24.
McConkieGWKerrPWReddixMDZolaD (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words.Vision Research28, 1107–1118.
25.
McConkieGWRaynerK (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.Perception & Psychophysics17, 578–586.
26.
McConkieGWZolaD (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading.Perception & Psychophysics25, 221–224.
27.
MorrisRKRaynerKPollatsekA (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16, 268–281.
28.
MorrisonREInhoffAW (1981). Visual factors and eye movements in reading.Visible Language15, 129–146.
29.
O'ReganK (1979). Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics25, 501–509.
30.
O'ReganK (1980). The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control.Perception & Psychophysics28, 112–117.
31.
O'ReganJK (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movments and their role in visual and cognitive processes(pp. 395–453)Amsterdam:Elsevier.
32.
O'ReganJKJacobsAM (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.18, 185–197.
33.
O'ReganJKLévy-SchoenAPynteJBrugaillèreB (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10, 250–257.
34.
O'ReganJKVituFRadachRKerrPW (1994). Effects of local processing and oculomotor factors in eye movement guidance in reading. In J. Ygge & G. Lennerstrand (Eds.), Eye movements in reading(pp. 329–348)Oxford, UK:Pergamon Press.
35.
PaapKRNewsomeSLNoelRW (1984). Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10, 413–428.
36.
PatersonDGTinkerMA (1946). Readability of newspaper headlines printed in capitals and in lower case.Journal of Applied Psychology30, 161–168.
37.
PatersonDGTinkerMA (1947). The effect of typography upon the perceptual span in reading.American Journal of Psychology60, 388–396.
38.
PereaMRosaE (2002). Does “whole-word shape” play a role in visual word recognition?.Perception & Psychophysics64, 785–794.
39.
PollatsekARaynerK (1982). Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance8, 817–833.
40.
PynteJ (1996). Lexical control of within-word eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22, 958–969.
41.
PynteJ (2000). Words likely to generate many lexical candidates are granted an advantage: Evidence from within-word eye movements. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process(pp. 47–64)Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
42.
PynteJKennedyADucrotS (2004). The influence of parafoveal typographical errors in eye movements in reading.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology16, 178–202.
43.
PynteJKennedyAMurrayWS (1991). Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: Time course of perceptual, lexical and contextual processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance17, 458–470.
44.
RadachRInhoffAHellerD (2004). Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology16, 27–51.
45.
RadachRKempeV (1993). An individual analysis of initial fixation positions in reading. In G. d'Ydewalle & J. Van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research(pp. 213–226)Amsterdam:Elsevier.
46.
RadachRKrummenacherJHellerDHofmeisterJ (1995). Individual eye movement patterns in word recognition: Perceptual and linguistic factors. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications(pp. 421–432)Amsterdam:Elsevier.
47.
RadachRMcConkieGW (1998). Determinants of fixation positions in words during reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception(pp. 77–100)Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
48.
RaynerK (1975). Parafoveal identification during a fixation in reading.Acta Psychologica39, 271–282.
49.
RaynerK (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words.Perception8, 21–30.
50.
RaynerK (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin124, 372–422.
51.
RaynerKBinderKSAshbyJPollatsekA (2001). Eye movement control in reading: Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words.Vision Research41, 943–954.
52.
RaynerKFischerMHPollatsekA (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control.Vision Research38, 1129–1144.
53.
RaynerKMcConkieGW (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements?.Vision Research16, 829–837.
54.
RaynerKMcConkieGWZolaD (1980). Integrating information across eye movements.Cognitive Psychology12, 206–226.
55.
RaynerKPollatsekA (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology33A, 351–373.
56.
RaynerKSerenoSCRaneyGE (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22, 1188–1200.
57.
RaynerKWhiteSJKambeGMillerBLiversedgeSP (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research(pp. 213–234)Amsterdam:Elsevier.
58.
ReichleEDRaynerKPollatsekA (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z reader model.Vision Research39, 4403–4411.
59.
ReichleEDRaynerKPollatsekA (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Behavioral and Brain Sciences26, 445–526.
60.
ReillyRGO'ReganJK (1998). Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies.Vision Research38, 303–317.
61.
ReillyRGRadachR (2003). Foundations of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research(pp. 429–455)Amsterdam:Elsevier.
62.
TinkerMAPatersonDG (1939). Influence of type form on eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology25, 528–531.
63.
TrueswellJCTanenhausMKGarnseySM (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution.Journal of Memory and Language33, 285–318.
64.
VituFMcConkieGWKerrPO'ReganJK (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect.Vision Research41, 3513–3533.
65.
VituFO'ReganJKMittauM (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous texts.Perception & Psychophysics47, 583–600.
66.
VonkWRadachRvan RijnH (2000). Eye guidance and the saliency of word beginnings in reading text. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process(pp. 269–299)Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
67.
WhiteSJLiversedgeSP (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology16, 52–78.
68.
YangS-NMcConkieGW (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation time.Vision Research41, 3567–3585.
