Three experiments investigated whether reading aloud is affected by a semantic variable, imageability. The first two experiments used English, and the third experiment used Japanese Kanji as a way of testing the generality of the findings across orthographies. The results replicated the earlier findings that readers were slower and more error prone in reading low-frequency exception words when they were low in imageability than when they were high in imageability (Strain, Patterson, & Seidenberg, 1995). This result held for both English and Kanji even when age of acquisition was taken into account as a possible confounding variable, and the imageability effect was stronger in Kanji compared to English.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmanoS.Kondo (2000). Word frequency database. Lexical database series: Lexical properties of Japanese (Vol.7)Tokyo: Sanseido.
2.
BarryC.MorrisonC. M.EllisA. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology50A, 560–585.
3.
BirdH.HowardD.FranklinS. (2000). Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits.Brain and Language72, 246–309.
4.
BirdH.Lambon RalphM. A.PattersonK.HodgesJ. (2000). The rise and fall of frequency and imageability: Noun and verb production in semantic dementia.Brain and Language73, 17–49.
5.
BrownG. D. A.WatsonF. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency.Memory &Cognition15, 208–216.
6.
CarelloC.TurveyM. T.LukatelaG. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological?.Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: Advances in psychology.FrostR.KatzL.Amsterdam: North-HollandVol. 94, 211–226.
7.
CipolottiL.WarringtonE. K. (1995). Semantic memory and reading abilities: A case report.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society1, 104–110.
8.
ColtheartM.CurtisB.AtkinsR.HallerM. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and paralleldistributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review100, 589–608.
9.
ColtheartM.PattersonK. E.MarshallJ. C. (1980). Deep dyslexiaLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
ColtheartM.RastleK. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 1197–1211.
11.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review108, 204–256.
12.
DenesE.CipolottiL.ZorziM. (1999). Acquired dyslexias and dysgraphias.Handbook of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.DenesG.PizzamiglioL.Hove, UK: Psychology Press289–317.
13.
EllisA. W.Lambon RalphM. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 1103–1123.
14.
EIIisA. W.MorrisonC. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition24, 515–523.
15.
FeldmanL. B.TurveyM. T. (1980). Words written in Kana are named faster than the same words written in Kanji.Language and Speech23, 141–147.
16.
FrostR. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails.Psychological Bulletin123, 71–99.
17.
FrostR.KatzL.BentinS. (1987). Strategies for visual w ord recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13, 104–115.
18.
FunnellE. (1996). Response biases in oral reading: An account of the co-occurrence of surface dyslexia and semantic dementia.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology49A, 417–446.
19.
FushimiT.IjuinM.PattersonK.TatsumiI. (1999). Consistency, frequency, and lexicality effects in naming Japanese Kanji.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 382–407.
20.
GerhandS.BarryC. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise.Journal of Experimentai Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition24, 267–283.
21.
GerhandS.BarryC. (1999). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition27, 592–602.
22.
GilhoolyK. J.LogieR. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1944 words.Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation12, 395–427.
23.
GoryoK. (1987). On readingTokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai in Japanese.
24.
GumT.BubD. (1988). PsychLab softwareMontreal, Canada: Montreal Neurological Institute.
25.
HarmM. W.SeidenbergM. S.Division of labor in the triangle model of visual mord recognitionPaper presented at the 1999 Meeting of the Psychonomics Society.1999.
26.
JacobsA. M.RevA.XieglerJ. C.GraingerJ. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition.Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition.GraingerJ.JacobsAM.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27.
JonesG. V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication.Brain and Language24, 1–19.
28.
KimuraY. (1984). Concurrent vocal interference: Its effects on Kana and Kanji.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology36A, 117–131.
29.
KohonenT. (1984). Self-organization and associative memoryBerlin: Springer-Verlag.
30.
KuceraH.FrancisW. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American EnglishProvidence, RI: Brown University Press.
31.
Lamhon RalphM.EllisA. W.FranklinS. (1995). Semantic-loss without surface dyslexia.Neurocase1, 363–369.
32.
LukatelaG.PopadicR.OgnjenovicR.TurveyM. T. (1980). Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow or thography.Memory & Cognition8, 124–132.
33.
McCarthyR. A.WarringtonE. K. (1990). Cognitive neuropsychology: A clinical introductionSan Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34.
MizurioR. (1997). A test of a hypothesis of automatic phonological processing of Kanji words.The Japanese Journal of Psychology68, 11–8.
35.
MonaghanJ.EllisA. W. (2002). What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition28, 183–206.
36.
MorrisonC. M.ChappellT. D.EllisA. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms tor a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology50A, 528–559.
37.
MorrisonC. M.EllisA. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21, 116–133.
38.
MorrisonC. M.EllisA. W.QuinlanP. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.Memory & Cognition20, 705–714.
39.
PattersonK. E.HodgesJ. R. (1992). Deterioration of word meaning: Implications tor reading.Neuropsychologia12, 1025–1040.
40.
PattersonK. E.GrahamH.HodgesJ. R. (1994). Reading in Arzheimer's type dementia: A preserved ability?.Neuropsychologia8, 395–412.
41.
PattersonK. E.SuzukiT.WydellT.SasanumaS. (1995). Progressive aphasia and surface alexia in Japanese.Neurocase1, 155–165.
42.
PaulesuE.McCroryE.FazioF.MononcelloL.BrunswickN.CappaS. F.CoteIIiM.CossuG.CorteF.LorossuM.PesentiS.GallagherA.PeraniD.PriceC.FrithC. D.FrithL. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function.Nature Neuroscience3, 3–591–96.
43.
PlautD. C.McClellandJ. L.SeidenbergM. S.PattersonK. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domain.Psychological Review103, 56–115.
44.
PlautD. C.ShalliceT. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology10, 377–500.
45.
RastleK.ColtheartM. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 482–503.
46.
SaffranE. M.SchwartzM. F.MarinO. S. M. (1976). Semantic mechanisms in paralexia.Brain and Language3, 255–265.
47.
SaitoH. (1981). Use of graphemic and phonemic encoding in reading Kanji and Kana.The Japanese Journal of Psychology52, 266–273.
48.
SchwartzM. F.SaffranE. M.MarinO. S. M. (1980). Fractionating the reading process in dementia: Evidence for word-specific print-to-sound associations.Deep dyslexia.ColtheartM.PattersonK.MarshallJ. C.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul259–269.
49.
SeidenbergM. S.McClellandJ. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychologial Review96, 523–568.
50.
StrainE.HerdmanC. M. (1999). Imageability effects in word naming: An individual differences analysis.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology53, 347–359.
51.
StrainE.PattersonK.SeidenbergM. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21, 1140–1154.
52.
StrainE.PattersonK.SeidenbergM. S. (2002). Theories of word naming interact with spelling – sound consistency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition28, 207–214.
53.
Sweet JAM 4.5 [Computer software]Tokyo, Japan: A & A Company, Ltd1990.
54.
Van OrdenG. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition15, 181–198.
55.
Van OrdenG. C.JohnstonJ. C.HaleB. L. (1988). Word identification proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition14, 371–386.
56.
Van OrdenG. C.PenningtonB. F.StoneG. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholingustics.Psychologial Review97, 488–522.
57.
VenezkyR. L. (1970). The structure of English orthographyThe Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
58.
WydellT.ButtersorthB.PattersonK. (1995). The inconsistency of consistency effects in reading: The case of Japanese Kanji.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21, 1155–1168.
59.
WydellT.ButterworthB.ShihaharaN.ZorziM.The irregularity of regularity effects in reading: The case of Japanese KanjiProceedings of the 1997 Meeting of the British Experimental Psychology Society.Cardiff, UKBell and Bain LtdGlasgow199760.
60.
WydellT.PattersonK.HumphreysG. (1993). Phonologically mediated access to meaning for Kanji: Is a ROWS still a ROSE in Japanese Kanji?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition19, 491–514.
61.
WydellT.QuinlanP.ButterworthB.Japanese lexical database: 2,357 Japanese nouns rated on frequency, familiarity, and imageability, and other language statistics on Kanji characters/wordsHove, UK: Psychology Pressin press.
62.
YamazakiM.EllisA. W.MorrisonC. M.Lamhon RalphM. A. (1997). Two age of acquisition effects in the reading of Japanese Kanji.British Journal of Psychology88, 407–421.
63.
ZorziM. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hitman Perception and Performance26, 847–856.
64.
ZorziM.Computational models of reading.Connectionist models in psychology.HoughtonG.Hove, UK: Psychology Pressin press.
65.
ZorziM.HoughtonG.ButterworthB. (1998a). The development of spelling — sound relationships in a model of phonological reading.Language and Citgnitive Process13, 337–371.
66.
ZorziM.HoughtonG.ButterworthB. (1998h). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dualprocess model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hitman Perception and Performance24, 1131–1161.
