Six experiments examined the issue of whether one single system or separate systems underlie visual and auditory orienting of spatial attention. When auditory targets were used, reaction times were slower on trials in which cued and target locations were at opposite sides of the vertical head-centred meridian than on trials in which cued and target locations were at opposite sides of the vertical visual meridian or were not separated by any meridian. The head-centred meridian effect for auditory stimuli was apparent when targets were cued by either visual (Experiments 2, 3, and 6) or auditory cues (Experiment 5). Also, the head-centred meridian effect was found when targets were delivered either through headphones (Experiments 2, 3, and 5) or external loudspeakers (Experiment 6). Conversely, participants showed a visual meridian effect when they were required to respond to visual targets (Experiment 4). These results strongly suggest that auditory and visual spatial attention systems are indeed separate, as far as endogenous orienting is concerned.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AwhE.PashlerH. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26, 834–846.
2.
BedardM. A.El MassiouiFE.PillonB.NandrinoJ. L. (1993). Time for reorienting of attention: A premotor hypothesis of the underlying mechanism.Neuropsychologia31, 241–249.
3.
BichotN. P.CaveK. R.PashlerH. (1999). Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations.Perception & Psychophysics61, 403–423.
4.
EimerM. (1999). Can attention be directed to opposite locations in different modalities? An ERP study.Clinical Neurophysiology110, 1252–1259.
5.
FarahM. J.WongA. B.MonheitM. A.MorrowL. A. (1989). Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal?.Neuropsychologia27, 461–470.
6.
HahnS.KramerA. F. (1995). Attentional flexibility and aging: You don't need to be 20 years of age to split the beam.Psychology and Aging10, 597–609.
7.
HartlineP. H.Pandey VimalR. L.KingA. J.KuryloD. D.NorthmoreD. P. M. (1995). Effects of eye position on auditory localization and neural representation of space in superior colliculus of cats.Experimental Brain Research104, 402–408.
8.
HughesH. C.NelsonM. D.AronchickD. M. (1998). Spatial characteristics of visual-auditory summation in human saccades.Vision Research38, 3955–3963.
9.
HughesH. C.ZimbaL. D. (1985). Spatial maps of directed visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance11, 409–430.
10.
HughesH. C.ZimbaL. D. (1987). Natural boundaries for the spatial spread of directed visual attention.Neuropsychologia25, 5–18.
11.
IttiL.KochC. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention.Nature Review Neuroscience2, 194–203.
12.
JayM. F.SparksD. L. (1984). Auditory receptive fields in primate superior colliculus shift with changes in eye position.Nature309, 345–347.
13.
JayM. F.SparksD. L. (1987). Sensorimotor integration in the primate superior colliculus II. Co-ordinates of auditory signals.Journal of Neurophysiology57, 35–55.
14.
LaBergeD. (1995). Attentional processing: The brain's art of meaningfullnessCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
McDonaldJ. J.Teder-SälejärviW. A.HillyardS. A. (2000). Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.Nature407, 906–908.
16.
McDonaldJ. J.WardL. M. (1999). Spatial relevance determines facilitatory and inhibitory effects of auditory cover spatial orienting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 1234–1352.
17.
McDonaldJ. J.WardL. M. (2000). Involuntary listening aids seeing: Evidence from human electrophysiology.Psychological Science11, 167–171.
18.
MeredithM. A.SteinB. E. (1986). Spatial factors determine the activity of multisensory neurons in cat superior colliculus.Brain Research365, 350–354.
19.
MillerJ. O. (1988). A warning about meridian reaction times.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance44, 539–543.
20.
MondorT. A.AmiraultK. J. (1998). Effect of same and different modality spatial cue on auditory and visual target identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 745–755.
21.
MondorT. A.ZatorreR. J. (1995). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 387–409.
22.
MorrelF. (1972). Visual system's view of acoustic space.Nature238, 44–46.
23.
MoschovakisA. K. (1996). The superior colliculus and eye movement control.Current Opinion in Neurobiology6, 811–816.
24.
PalmerA. R.KingA. J. (1982). The representation of auditory space in the mammalian superior colliculus.Nature299, 248–249.
25.
PeckC. K.BareJ. A.WarderS. M. (1995). Effects of eye position on saccadic eye movements and on the neural responses to auditory and visual stimuli in cat superior colliculus.Experimental Brain Research103, 227–242.
26.
PosnerM. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mindHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27.
PosnerM. I.DehaeneS. (1994). Attentional networks.Trends in Neuroscience17, 75–79.
28.
PosnerM. I.PetersenS. E. (1990). Attention system of the human brain.Annual Review of Neuroscience13, 25–42.
29.
QuinlanP. T.BaileyP. J. (1995). An examination of attentional contol in the auditory modality: Further evidence for auditory orienting.Perception & Psychophysics57, 614–628.
30.
Reuter LorenzPA.FendrichR. (1992). Oculomotor readiness and covert orienting: Differences between central and reflexive precues.Perception & Psychophysics59, 885–899.
31.
RhodesG. (1987). Auditory attention and the representation of spatial information.Perception & Psychophysics42, 1–14.
32.
RizzolattiG.CamardaR. (1987). Neural circuits for spatial attention and unilateral neglect.Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect.JeannerodM.Amsterdam: North Holland289–313.
33.
RizzolattiG.RiggioL.DascolaI.UmiltàC. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a promoter theory of attention.Neuropsychologia25, 31–40.
34.
RizzolattiG.RiggioL.SheligaB. M. (1994). Space and selective attention.Conscious and nonconscious information processing.UmiltàC.MoscovitchM.Attention and performance, XVCambridge, MA: MIT Press231–265.
35.
RizzolattiG.ScandolaraCMatelliM.GentilucciM. (1981). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses.Behavioral Brain Research2, 147–163.
36.
SchmittM.PostmaA.De HaanE. (2000). Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology53, A105–130.
37.
SpenceC. J.DriverJ. (1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 555–574.
38.
SpenceC. J.DriverJ. (1996). Audio visual link in endogenous covert spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22, 1005–1030.
39.
SpenceC. J.DriverJ. (1997). Audio visual link in endogenous covert spatial orienting.Perception & Psychophysics59, 1–22.
40.
SteinB. E.MeredithM. A.WallaceM. T. (1993). The visually responsive neuron and beyond: Multisensory integration in cat and monkey.Progress in Brain Research95, 79–90.
41.
WardL. M. (1994). Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology48, 242–259.
42.
WardL. M.McDonaldJ. J.LinD. (2000). On asymmetries in crossmodal spatial attention orienting.Perception & Psychophysics62, 1258–1264.
