Three self-paced reading experiments investigated children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Across the three experiments, subcategorization preference of a verb in a subordinate clause and the semantic plausibility of the misanalysis were manipulated. Reading times in the temporarily ambiguous region and following syntactic disambiguation indicated that children in the age range tested (8 years, 11 months to 12 years, 11 months) routinely misanalyse sentences of the type tested, and their tendency to misanalyse the sentences does not depend on the subcategorization preferences of the initial verb. Additional correlational analyses suggested that subcategory information did affect the degree of difficulty that readers experienced processing the critical noun and matrix verb.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsB. C.CliftonC.Jr.MitchellD. C. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing?.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review5, 265–270.
2.
BolandJ. E.TanenhausM. K. (1991). The role of lexical representations in sentence processing.Understanding word and sentence.SimpsonG. B.Amsterdam: Elsevier331–366.
3.
BoothJ. R.MacWhinneyB.HarasakiY.Children's auditory and visual processing of complex sentencesPaper presented to the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society.Dallas, TX, USA1998.
4.
CliftonC.Jr. (1993). Thematic roles in sentence parsing.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology47, 222–246.
5.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciencesHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6.
CrainS.SteedmanM. K. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser.Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives.DowtyD.KarttunenL.ZwickyA.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CrainS.ThorntonR. (1998). Investigations in universal grammarCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
FodorJ. D. (1988). On modularity in grammar.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research17, 125–168.
9.
FodorJ. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing.Language and Cognitive Processes4, 155–210.
10.
FrazierL. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategiesUSA: University of Connecticut PhD thesis.
11.
FrazierL. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review.Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading.ColtheartM.Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
12.
FrazierL.RaynerK. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology14, 178–210.
13.
GarnseyS. M.PearlmutterN. J.MyersE.LotockyM. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences.Journal of Memory and Language37, 58–93.
14.
JurafskyD. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation.Cognitive Science20, 137–194.
15.
JustM. A.CarpenterP. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review87, 329–354.
16.
MacDonaldM. C.PearlmutterN. J.SeidenbergM. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.Psychological Review101, 676–703.
17.
MitchellD. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics.Attention and performance XII.ColtheartM.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc601–618.
18.
MitchellD. C.CuetosE.CorleyM. M. B.BrysbaertM. (1995). Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research24, 469–488.
19.
MitchellD. C.GreenD. W. (1978). The effects of context and content on immediate processing in reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology30, 609–636.
20.
MurrayW. S.KennedyA. (1988). Spatial coding in the processing of anaphor by good and poor readers: Evidence from eye-movement analyses.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology40A, 693–718.
21.
PickeringM. J.TraxlerM. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition24, 940–961.
22.
PickeringM. J.TraxlerM. J.CrockerM. W. (2000). Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts.Journal of Memory and Language43, 447–475.
23.
TraxlerM. J.FossD. J.“Priming” does not prime “Priming”Poster presented to the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society.Los Angeles, CA, USA1999.
24.
TraxlerM. J.JoyeE. W. (2000). Children's use of prosodic cues to structure temporarily ambiguous input Manuscript submitted for publication.
25.
TraxlerM. J.PickeringM. J. (1996a). Case marking in the processing of complement clause ambiguities.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology49A, 991–1004.
26.
TraxlerM. J.PickeringM. J. (1996b). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study.Journal of Memory and Language35, 454–475.
27.
TraxlerM. J.PickeringM. J.CliftonC.Jr. (1998). Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution.Journal of Memory and Language39, 558–592.
28.
TrueswellJ. T.SekerinaI.HillN. M.LogripM. L. (1999). The kindergarden-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children.Cognition73, 89–134.
29.
TrueswellL.TanenhausM. K.KelloC. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition19, 528–553.
30.
TylerL. K.Marslen-WilsonW. D. (1978). Some developmental aspects of sentence processing and memory.Journal of Child Language5, 113–129.
31.
TylerL. K.Marslen-WilsonW. D. (1981). Children's processing of spoken language.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior20, 400–416.
32.
Van GompelR. P. G.PickeringM. J. (2000). Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, Mitchell (1998) Manuscript submitted for publication.
