This paper takes a fresh look at the important issue of regional competitiveness in the light of the recent publication of indicators of competitiveness by the DTI (1998). We set our analysis within the theoretical framework provided by Porter (1990) and our intention is to improve on these “official” indicators and also upon those of Gudgin (1996). Using a series of proxy variables which measure success in the areas deemed essential by the theory, we present evidence that the relative ranking of regions should be re-examined and provide a method which will allow policy makers to focus more directly on the specific areas that maximise regional performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsheimB.1996: Industrial districts as “Learning Regions”: a condition for prosperity, European Planning Studies, Vol4, No4, 379–400.
2.
BachtlerJ.TaylorS.1996: Regional Development Strategies in Objective 2 Regions: a comparative assessment, Regional Studies, Vol30, No8, December, 723–32.
3.
BolthoA.1996: The assessment of international competitiveness, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol12, No3, 1–16.
4.
CastelisM.HallP.1994: Technopoles of the world — the making of 21st century industrial complexes, London: Routledge.
5.
CookeP.1997: Regions in a global market: the experiences of Wales and Baden Wurttemburg, Review of International Political Economy, Vol4, No2, Summer, 349–81.
6.
CookeP.MorganK.1998: The associational economy, London: OUP.
7.
DTI1998: Regional competitiveness indicators, London: Government Statistical Service.
8.
DunningJ. H.BannermanE.LundanS.M.1998: Competitiveness and industrial policy in Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland Research Council, Research Monograph 5, March.
9.
FagerbergJ.1995: User-producer interaction, learning and competitive advantage, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol19, 243–56.
10.
FossN.1996: Research in Strategy, Economics and Michael Porter, Journal of Management Studies, Vol33, No1, 1–24.
11.
GudginG.1996: Prosperity and growth in UK Regions, Local Economy, Vol11, No1, 7–26.
12.
HugginsN.1997: Regional Competitive Specialization. Development Agency Sector Initiatives in Wales, Area, Vol29, No3, 241–52.
13.
KrugmanP. R.1996: Making sense of the competitiveness debate, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol12, No3, Autumn, 17–25.
14.
MaskellP.MalmbergA.1995: Localised learning and industrial competitiveness, Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference, Gothenburg, May.
15.
MorganK.1997: The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies, Vol31, No5, 491–503.
16.
MorganR. H.1996: Endogenous growth strategies: the case of Wales, European Planning Studies, Vol4, No6, 152–61.
17.
PorterM.1990: The competitive advantage of nations, London: Macmillan.
18.
RobsonM. T.1996: Macroeconomic factors in the birth and death of UK firms: evidence from quarterly VAT registrations, Manchester School, Vol64, No2, 170–88.
19.
RugmanA. M.(ed)1993: Management International Review, Vol33, No2, Spring (special edition on Michael Porter's Diamond of Competitive Advantage).
20.
SteinleW. J.1992: Regional competitiveness and the single market, Regional Studies, Vol26, No4, 307–18.
21.
StorperM.1994: Institutions in a learning economy, Paper presented to OECD conference on employment and growth in a knowledge based economy, Copenhagen, November.
22.
ThurrowL.1993: Head to head: the coming economic battle among Japan, Europe and America, London: Nicholas Brealey.
23.
VickermanR. W.1989: Measuring changes in regional competitiveness: the effects of international infrastructure investments, Annals of Regional Science, Vol23, No4, 275–86.
