BlackmoreM.BradshawYJenkinsonS.JohnsonN.KendalI.1997: Intermediary organisations in the new welfare mix: a case study, Non Profit Studies, Vol 1, No 2, 13-20.
2.
BurridgeD.1990: What local groups need, London: National Council for Voluntary Organisations.
3.
ChananG.1991: Taken for granted, London: Community Development Foundation.
4.
ChananG.1996: Regeneration: plugging gaps or pushing frontiers?, Local Economy, Vol 11, No 2, 98-103.
5.
DimaggioP.PowellW.1988: The iron case revisited, inMilofskyC.(ed)Community organizations, New York: Oxford University Press, 77-99.
6.
HuxhamC.VangenS.1996: Managing inter-organizational relationships, inOsborneS.(ed)Managing in the Voluntary Sector, London: International Thomson Business Press, 202-16.
7.
LansleyJ.1997: Intermediary bodies in the 1990s: new settings, old problems?, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Vol 7, No 2, 169-80.
8.
OsborneS.HemsL.1995: Economic structure of the voluntary sector in the UK, Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol 24, No 4, 321-36.
9.
OsborneS.HemsL.1996: Estimating the income and expenditure of charitable organizations in the UK, Non Profit Studies, Vol 1, No 1.
10.
OsborneS.TrickerM.1994: Local development agencies: supporting voluntary action, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Vol 5, No 1, 37-52.
11.
PiferA.1967: Quasi autonomous non governmental organizations, New York: Carnegie Corporation.
12.
WilsonD.ButlerR.1985: Corporatism in the British voluntary sector, inStreeckW.SchmitterP.(eds)Private interest government. Beyond market and state, London: Sage.
13.
Wolfenden Committee1978: Future of Voluntary organisations, London: Croom Helm.
