Previous research into education and student geographies has usually focussed on either compulsory schooling or university education. This paper, using London as a case study, is an innovative attempt to understand the geographies of non-compulsory, non-university education (‘further education’, FE) which plays a crucial role in a world city labour market that requires a wide range of skills. Original analysis is provided using findings from a questionnaire, interviews with students and senior college managers and the analysis of individual student records, the Individualised Student Record (ISR) and Pupil-Level School Census (PLASC). The education geography of 16-19 year olds in FE involves selection by institutions alongside choice by learners resulting in complex patterns of social segregation and travel to learn. The division between post 16 colleges and sixth forms attached to schools is crucial with the latter, wherever they are located, taking a less deprived section of the cohort.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AinleyP. (1999) Learning Policy: Towards the Certified Society (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
2.
AinleyP.BaileyB. (1997) The business of learning: staff and student experiences of further education in the 1990s (London: Cassell).
3.
AsthanaS.GibsonA. (2000) Estimating the Socioeconomic Characteristics of School Populations with the Aid of Pupil Postcodes and Small-Area Census Data: An Appraisal, Environment And Planning A, 32, pp. 1267–1285.
4.
BloomerM. (1997) Curriculum Making in Post-16 Education: The Social Conditions of Studentship (London: Routledge).
5.
BuckN.GordonI.HallP.HarloeM.KleinmanM. (2002) Working Capital Life and Labour in Contemporary London (London: Routledge).
6.
City Of London (2007) The Competitive Impact of London's Financial Market Infrastructure (London: City Of London Corporation).
7.
DelvauxB.Van ZantenA. (2004), Les Espaces Locaux D'interdépendance Entre Etablissements: Une Comparaison Européenne, Report of a Research Programme: Changement Des Modes De Régulation Et Production Sociale Des Inégalités Dans Les Systèmes D'éducation: Une Comparaison Européenne. Available At http://www.Girsef.Ucl.Ac.Be/Deliverable7.Pdf. (accessed August 2009).
8.
DickenP.LloydP. (1990) Location In Space: Theoretical Perspectives On Economic Geography (New York: Harper & Row).
9.
Dfes (2007) Raising Expectations: Staying in Education and Training Post 16 Green Paper CM7065 (London: HMSO).
10.
DupriezV. (2004) Towards a More Egalitarian School: a Contextualized Analysis of Change, Research Paper Groupe interdisciplinaire de Recherche sur la Socialisation, l'Education et la Formation (GIRSEF) Université Catholique de Louvain. Available at www.girsef.ucl.ac.be/Membres/Dupriez/Towards%20a%20more%20egalitarian%20school.pdf (last accessed August 2009).
11.
Funding Agency For Schools (1998) Planning Secondary School Places in London 1998-2005 (London: Funding Agency for Schools).
12.
GibsonA.AsthanaS. (2000) What's In A Number? Commentary On Gorard And Fitz's ‘Investigating The Determinants Of Segregation Between Schools’, Research Papers in Education, 15(2), pp. 133–153.
13.
GoldsteinH.NodenP. (2001) Modelling Social Segregation, Oxford Review of Education, 29, pp. 225–237.
14.
GreenA.HodgsonA.SakamotoA.SpoorsK. (1999) Research report of CEDEFOP on financing VET (London: Institute of Education).
15.
HamnettC. (1996) ‘Social Polarisation, Economic Restructuring and Welfare State Regimes’, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 1407–1430.
16.
JohnstonR.WilsonD.BurgessS. (2005) England's Multiethnic Educational System? A Classification Of Secondary Schools, Environment and Planning A, 37, pp. 35–62.
17.
Llewelyn Davies, Bartlett School Of Planning and Comedia (1996) Four World Cities: A Comparative Study Of London, Paris, New York And Tokyo (London: Llewellyn Davies).
18.
London South LSC (2004) Travel to Study Patterns and Causes in London. A report by the University of Brighton for the London Learning and Skills Councils (Croydon: London South Learning and Skills Council).
19.
London South LSC (2003) Travelling to College in London South. A report by the University of Brighton and Sustainable Findings for the London Learning (Croydon: London South Learning and Skills Council).
20.
LucasN. (2004) Teaching In Further Education: New Perspectives for a Changing Context (London: Institute Of Education, University Of London).
21.
MaroyC. (2004), Regulation and Inequalities in European Education Systems. Final Report of The European Commission Project HPSE-CT-2001-00086 ‘Changes in Regulation Modes And Social Production of Inequalities In Educational Systems: A European Comparison’. Available At http://www.Girsef.Ucl.Ac.Be/Reguleducnetwork_VF_10dec041.Pdf (accessed August 2009).
22.
MasseyD.S.DentonN. (1988) ‘The Dimensions Of Residential Segregation’, Social Forces, 67, pp. 281–315.
23.
MasseyD.S.WhiteM. J.PhuaV.-C. (1996) The Dimensions Of Segregation Revisited, Sociological Methods And Research, 25(2), pp. 172–206.
24.
NodenP. (2000) Rediscovering the Impact of Marketisation: Dimensions of Social Segregation in England's Secondary Schools, 1994-99, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), pp. 371–390.
25.
Office For National Statistics (2004) Regional Trends 38 (London: HMSO).
26.
ParsonsE.ChalkleyB.JonesA. (2000) School Catchments and Pupil Movements: A Case Study in Parental Choice, Educational Studies, 26(1), pp. 33–48.
27.
StantonG. (2004), The Organisation of Full-Time 14-19 Provision in The State Sector, Nuffield Review Of 14-19 Education And Training Working Paper 13.
28.
TaylorC. (2002) Geography of the ‘New’ Education Market: Secondary School Choice in England And Wales (Aldershot: Ashgate).
29.
TaylorC.GorardS.FitzJ. (2000) A Re-Examination Of Segregation Indices in Terms of Compositional Invariance, Social Research Update, 30, pp. 1–4.
30.
TaylorC.GorardS. (2001) The Role of Residence in School Segregation: Placing the Impact of Parental Choice in Perspective, Environment and Planning A, 33(10), pp. 1829>–1852.
31.
WatsonJ. (2004) Collective Habitus: A Critique of the ‘Learning Region’ with Reference to the Thames Gateway, Higher Education Review, 37(1), pp. 32–48.
