This paper reports on a recent pilot project by the English government aimed at introducing ‘single pot’ funding for local voluntary and community groups. It finds that implementation difficulties undermined the success of the scheme. Moreover, whilst local voluntary and community groups were initially enthusiastic about the scheme, this was eroded both by the shortfall in funding for the initiative and by conflicting priorities for it from its national and regional flinders and from local groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Commission for Rural Communities (2008) State of the Countryside 2008 (Cheltenham: Commission for Rural Communities).
2.
CuttJ.MurrayV. (2000) Accountability and Performance Evaluation in Non-Profit Organizations (London: Routledge).
3.
GronroosC. (2000) Services Management and Marketing: A Customer Relationship Approach (Wiley).
4.
HallS.MawsonJ. (1999) Challenge Funding, Contracts and Area Regeneration: A Decade of Innovation in Policy Management and Co-ordination (Bristol: Policy Press).
5.
Home Office Active Community Unit (2001) Funding Community Groups (London: Home Office).
6.
London Development Agency [LDA] (2001) LDA Consultation Paper on Area Based Renewal and Regeneration: Report Number 6 (London: LDA).
7.
LucasB. (2004) Will the Single Pot Tackle Social Exclusion? (Sheffield: NACVS).
8.
NankervisA. (2005) Managing Services (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
9.
ThomsonL.Caulier-GriceJ. (2007) Improving Small Scale Grant Funding for Local Voluntary and Community Organisations (London: Young Foundation).
10.
Urban Forum Research and Associates (2004) Out of the SRB, Into the Pot (London: Urban Forum).
