In the knowledge economy, the economic prosperity of places is increasingly tied to the talents of its people. Therefore, many cities and regions have made the attraction and retention of skilled people a core economic development strategy. This article argues that a better strategy is actually to increase the overall pool of talent available, and to do so means rethinking, and investing in, the workforce system. Once the literature and theory has been reviewed, the second half of the article mines multiple US case studies for useful lessons on how workforce systems can be developed and better aligned to economic development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC. (2000) A Parallel Postsecondary Universe: The Certification System in Information Technology (Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, US Department of Education).
CastellsM. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume 1: The Rise of the Network Society (Malden, MA: Blackwell).
4.
FloridaR. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life (New York: Basic Books).
5.
GarmiseS. (2006) People and the Competitive Advantage of Place: Building a Workforce for the 21st Century (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe).
6.
GilothR. (2004) Introduction: a case for workforce intermediaries, in: GilothR. (Ed) Workforce Intermediaries for the Twenty-First Century, pp. 3–30 (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press).
7.
GlaeserE.ShapiroJ. (2001) Is there a new urbanism? The growth of U.S. cities in the 1990s. Working Paper 8357 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research). www.nber.org/papers/w8357 (downloaded March 2005).
8.
GottliebP. (2001) The Problem of Brain Drain in Ohio and Northeaster Ohio: What Is It? How Severe Is It? What Should We Do About It? (Cleveland, OH: Center for Regional Economic Issues).
9.
GottliebPFogartyM. (2003) Educational attainment and metropolitan growth, Economic Development Quarterly, 4(November), pp. 325–336.
10.
GrubbW. N. (1996) Learning to Work: The Case for Reintegrating Job Training and Education (New York: Russell Sage).
11.
HansenS.BanC.HugginsL. (2003) Explaining the ‘brain drain’ from older industrial cities: the Pittsburgh region, Economic Development Quarterly, 17, pp. 132–147.
12.
KazisR. (2004) What do workforce intermediaries do?, in: GilothR. (Ed) Workforce Intermediaries for the Twenty-First Century, pp. 73–92 (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press).
13.
Kent State University. (2003) College Graduate Retention Initiative Research Report (Canton, OH: Kent State University).
14.
KriegR. (1991) Human capital selectivity in interstate migration, Growth and Change, 22(1), pp. 68–76.
15.
LedeburL.SheltonJ.BrowningG.SmithP.WillsJ.KaufmanB.DavisS.CreticosP. (2002) State strategies for workforce development through skills standards and worker credentialing. Prepared for the Governor's Workforce Policy Board, State of Ohio (Cleveland, OH: Urban Center, Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University) May 31.
16.
LeeteL.BennerC.PastorM.JrZimmermanS. (2004) Labor market intermediaries in the old and new economies: a survey of worker experiences in Milwaukee and Silicon Valley, in: GilothR. (Ed) Workforce Intermediaries for the Twenty-First Century, pp. 263–290 (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press).
17.
LucasR. E. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3–42.
18.
MarkusenA. (2004) Targeting occupations in regional and community economic development, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), pp. 253–268.
19.
MathurV. (1999) Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development, Economic Development Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 203–216.
20.
OstermanP. (1999) Securing Prosperity—The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
21.
PorterM. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (New York: Free Press).
22.
RomerP. M. (1990) Capital, labor and productivity, in: BaileyM.N.WinstonC. (Eds) Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 317–367 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).
23.
Stark Education Partnership. (Undated) College Graduate Retention: An Initiative Planning Document for Medina, Portage, Summit, Stark and Wayne Counties (Canton, OH).
24.
The Random House Dictionary. Concise Edition (1980) (New York: Random House).
25.
TournatzkyL.GrayD.TarantS.HoweJ. (1998) Where Have All the Students Gone? A Benchmarking Report of the Southern Technology Council (Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Polices Board).
26.
TournatzkyL.GrayD.TarantS.ZimmerC. (2001) Who Will Stay and Who Will Leave? A Report of the Southern Technology Council (Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Polices Board).
