Recent British welfare reform involves the creation of a managed welfare market for the delivery of employment programmes. This article critically reviews evidence on the development and impacts of such markets in Australia, the USA and the Netherlands. It considers the emergence of problems with ‘creaming’ and ‘parking’ of participants and the challenges that ‘market makers’ must meet if they are to secure anticipated improvements in service delivery and outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrodkinE. Z. (2005) Towards a contractual welfare state? The case of work activation in the United States, in: SolE.WesterveldM. (Eds) Contractualism in Employment Services: A New Form of Welfare State Governance (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
2.
Bryna SangerM. (2003) The Welfare Marketplace: Privatization and Welfare Reform (Washington, DC: Center for Public Service, Brookings Institution Press).
3.
ConsidineM. (2005) The reform that never ends: quasi-markets and employment services in Australia, in: SolE.WesterveldM. (Eds) Contractualism in Employment Services: A New Form of Welfare State Governance (The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, Aspen Publishers).
4.
DaviesS. (2006) Third Sector Provision of Employment-Related Services. A Report for PCS (Leeds: Public and Commercial Services Union).
5.
DeParleJ. (2005) American Dream: Three Women. Ten Kids and a Nation's Drive to End Welfare (New York: Penguin Books).
6.
DWP. (2007) In Work, Better Off: Next Steps to Full Employment. Impact Assessment (London: Department for Work and Pensions).
7.
DWP. (2008) Department for Work and Pensions Commissioning Strategy, Cmnd 7330 (London: The Stationery Office).
8.
FinnD. (2008) The British ‘Welfare Market’: Lessons from Contracting Out Welfare to Work Programmes in Australia and the Netherlands (New york: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
9.
FinnD. (2007) Contracting Out Welfare to Work in the USA: Delivery Lessons, Research Report No. 466 (London: Department for Work and Pensions).
10.
FischerD. J. (2001) The Workforce Challenge: To Place is to Win (New York: Center for an Urban Future).
11.
FreudD. (2007) Reducing Dependency, Increasing Opportunity: Options for the Future of Welfare to Work: An Independent Report to the DWP (London).
12.
GouldM. (2007) A welfare-to-work scheme based in Sheffield is now helping the long-term unemployed in Israel. The Guardian, February 28, London.
13.
HeinrichC.ChoiY. (2007) Performance-based contracting in social welfare programs, The American Review of Public Administration, 37(4), pp. 409–435.
14.
JordanH. (2008) International Insights: Best Practice in Employment Programmes (London: Ingeus/Work Directions).
15.
MurrayP. (2006) A Job Network for Job Seekers, Discussion Paper, Catholic Social Services Australia (Australia: Curtin ACT).
16.
LilleyP.HartwichO. (Eds) (2008) Paying for Success: How to Make Contracting Out Work in Employment Services (London: Policy Exchange).
17.
OECD. (2006) Report on Missions to the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany Relating to Activation Strategies and Performance of Employment Services, August/September 2005, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Paris: OECD).
18.
PurnellJ. (2008) Written Ministerial Statements, Official Report, 28 February, col. 88WS (London: Hansard).
19.
StruyvenL.SteursG. (2005) Design and redesign of a quasi-market for the reintegration of jobseekers: empirical evidence from Australia and the Netherlands, Journal of European Social Policy, 15(3), pp. 211–219.
