Current British urban policy reflects the importance of the concept of mixed communities as a means of achieving sustainable communities. This paper will argue that the relationship expressed in UK policies between ‘mixed’ and ‘sustainable’ communities tends to refer to the final stage of the (re)development process of a community (the product), with far less consideration of all the in-between phases (the process). By comparing actual experiences in two US cities with the UK's policy intentions, this paper suggests that one of the implications of the emphasis on ‘product’ rather than ‘process’ is that the aims of sustainable communities may not be realised because they may be diverted during the process and because the in-between phases themselves could be intrinsically unsustainable.
BerubeA. (2004) Mixed communities in England. A US Perspective on Evidence and Policy Prospects (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
4.
BourdieuP. (1986) The Forms of Capital, in: RichardsonJ. E. (Ed) Handbook of Theory of Research in the Sociology of Education, pp. 241–258 (London: Greenword Press).
5.
CohenS. (2007) Don't you be my neighbor, available online at: www.citypaper.com
6.
Department for Transport, Local Environment and the Regions (2000) Quality and choice: a decent home for all. The Housing Green paper (London: DETR).
7.
GallentN.Tewdwr-JonesM. (2007) Decent Homes for All (London: Routledge).
8.
GoetzE. (2004) The reality of deconcentration, The Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Building, 138, available online at: http://www.nhi.org
9.
GoetzE. (2003) Clearing the Way. Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America (Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press).
10.
GullinoS. (2005) Il Millennium Village di Greenwich a Londra. Un progetto di rigenerazione urbana sostenibile, Paesaggio Urbano, 6, pp. 84–101.
11.
GullinoS.HaworthA.RacoM. (2007) Urban regeneration and sustainable communities (Milano: Libreria Clup).
12.
HaworthA. (2007) Planning and Developing Mixed Income Communities in England and Scotland — some Early Reflections on Theory and Practice, in: GullinoS.HaworthA.RacoM. (Eds) Urban Regeneration and Sustainable Communities, pp. 59–79 (Milano: Libreria Clup).
13.
JamesO.LodgeM. (2003) The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy research, Political studies review, 1(2), pp. 179–193.
14.
LuptonR.TunstallR. (2008) Neighbourhood regeneration through mixed communities: a ‘social justice dilemma’?Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), pp. 105–117.
15.
NathanM.MarshallA. (2006) Them and Us. Britain and the European city (London: Centre for cities).
16.
NewmarkA. J. (2002) An integrated approach to policy transfer and diffusion, Review of policy research, 19(2), pp. 151–178.
17.
NewmanS. (2003) Neighbourhood Effects of HOPE VI: Evidence from Baltimore, Occasional Paper n.28 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Institute of Policy Studies).
18.
ODPM (2003a) Sustainable Communities: Building for the future (London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister).
19.
ODPM (2003b) Sustainable Communities in London (London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister).
20.
ODPM (2003c) Creating sustainable communities: make it happens. Thames Gateway and the Growth Areas (London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister).
21.
ODPM (2005) Sustainable Communities: Homes for All. A Five Year Plan (London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister).
22.
PopkinS.KatzBCunninghamM. K.BrownK. D.GustafsonJ.Austin TurnerM. (2004) A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution).
23.
ScholarR. (Eds) (2006) Divided Cities (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
24.
SmithJ. (2002) HOPE VI and new urbanism: eliminating low-income housing to make mixed-income communities, Planners Network, 151(Spring), pp. 22–25.
25.
SmithJ.LuptonR. (2008) Mixed communities: challenges for urban education policy, Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), pp. 99–103.
26.
WhitakerD. T. (2000) Cabrini-Green in Words and Pictures (Chicago: LPC Group).
27.
WrightP. A.ZelalemY.DeGraafJ.RomanL. (1997) The Plan to Voucher out Public Housing: an Analysis of the Chicago Experience and a Case Study of the Proposal to Redevelop the Cabrini Green Public Housing Area (Chicago: The Nathalie P. Voorhees Center for Neighborhood and Community Improvement).
