This paper develops a critical perspective on ‘design-led’ urban regeneration, which is a fuzzy term used to describe a diverse raft of economic development strategies. A definition of design is outlined and then utilised in an assessment of a number of local and regional design-led urban regeneration schemes. A more detailed critique of one such project, the North Staffordshire Design Initiative, is then undertaken. We argue that there is a lack of best practice models and empirical research to guide policy makers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BryanJ.HillS.MundayM.RobertsA.2000: Assessing the role of arts and cultural industries in a local economy, Environment and Planning A, 32, 1391–408.
2.
ChetwynD. J. (2000). Constructive design intervention: the city of Stoke-on-Trent Strategy for the built environment, Built Environment, 25, 356–70.
3.
DantT.1999: Material culture in the social world, Buckinghamshire: Open University Press.
4.
Department Of Culture Media And Sport2000: Creative industries: the regional dimension: the report of the regional initiative working group, London: HMSO.
5.
Du GayP. (eds) 1997: Production of cultures/cultures of production. London: Sage.
6.
EdensorT. (ed) 2001: Reclaiming Stokeon- Trent: leisure space and identity in The Potteries, Stoke-on-Trent: Staffordshire University Press.
7.
FlemingT.1999: ICISS Report - local cultural industries support services in the UK: towards a model of best practice. Manchester Institute of Popular Culture, Manchester Metropolitan University.
8.
FloridaR.2002: The rise of the creative class, New York: Basic Books.
9.
GriffithsA.WilliamsA. (1992): Culture, regional image and economic development in the United Kingdom. World Futures,Vol 33105–129.
10.
JacksonP.ThriftN. (1995). Geographies of consumption. In MillerD. (ed), Acknowledging consumption: a review of new studies. London: Routledge, 204–237).
11.
JayneM.2000: Imag(in)ing a Post- Industrial Potteries. In BellD.and HaddourA. (eds), City visions, Harlow: Prentice Hall, 12–26).
12.
JulierG.2000: The culture of design, London: Sage.
13.
LandryC.1995: The creative city, London: Demos.
14.
LashS.URRYJ.1994: Economies of signs and space, London: Sage.
15.
McrobbieA.1999: In the Culture Society: art, fashion and popular music, London: Routledge.
16.
MillerD. :1987: Material culture and mass consumption, Oxford: Blackwell.
17.
MolotchH.1996: L.A. as design product: how art works in a regional economy. In ScottA. J.SojaE. (eds), The City: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century. Berkeley: University of California Press.. (pp. 225–275).
18.
MorrisJ.MundayM.WilkinsonB.1993: Working for the Japanese, London: Athlone Press.
19.
MyerscoughJ.1988: The economic importance of the arts in Britain, London: Policy Studies Institute.
20.
North Staffordshire Task Force2000: Action for North Staffordshire: a response to the ‘Byers initiative’, Wednesday 16 February.
21.
O'ConnorJ.WynneD. (eds) 1996; From the Margins to the Centre: cultural production and consumption in the postindustrial city, Aldershot: Arena.
22.
ParkinsonM.BianchiniF. (eds) 1996: Cultural policy and urban regeneration: the western European experience, University of Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
23.
PhillipsA. D. M. (ed) 1993: The Potteries: continuity and change in a North Staffordshire conurbation, Stroud: Allan Sutton.
