This paper suggests that Government plans to increase childminding provision in areas of deprivation may be seen as an entrepreneurial opportunity for lone parents in receipt of welfare benefits. But if it is to offer a route out of poverty, they will need integrated, specialist and continuing assistance to negotiate the fragmented systems currently associated with business and personal finances, and to understand the inter-connections between them. The findings from a small-scale feasibility project are presented as the starting point for the development of a recruitment and support strategy which foregrounds the financial aspects of childminding.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BondM.2000: Understanding the benefits/wages connection: financial literacy for citizenship in a risk society, Studies in the Education of Adults, Vol. 32 No.1, 63–77
2.
BridgeS.O'NeillK.CromieS.1998: Understanding enterprise, entrepreneurship and small business, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.
3.
BrysonA.FordR.WhiteM.1997: Making work pay: lone mothers, employment and well-being, York: York Publishing Services.
4.
CallenderC.2000: The barriers to childcare provision, London: Department for Education and Employment.
5.
CallenderC.KempM.2000: Changing student finances: income, expenditure and the take-up of student loans among full-and part-time higher education students in 1998/9, London: Department for Education and Employment.
6.
Child Poverty Action Group2001. Factfile: the wealth divide, Campaigns Newsletter, No 16, 3.
7.
Childcare Expansion Group2001: Childcare expansion needs in Wood End, Deedmore, Henley Green and Manor Farm, Coventry: New Deal for Communities.
Daycare Trust2001a: All our futures …, London: Daycare Trust.
10.
Daycare Trust2001b: Focus on funding, London: Daycare Trust.
11.
DearlingF.1998: Screaming for more! A study of childminders in the West Midlands, Birmingham: West Midlands Low Pay Unit.
12.
Department Of Social Security2000: Income support quarterly statistical enquiry, November, Table 12.3.
13.
Guardian2001: :100 boost for childminders, Guardian, 16th March, 8.
14.
HardingL.2000: Women's Full Circle Fund, Norwich, Local Economy, Vol. 15 No.1, 62–5.
15.
LakhaniB.ClarkeS.2001: Compulsory interviews for lone parents, Welfare Rights Bulletin, No 160, 11–3.
16.
MetcalfH.CrowleyT. V.AndersonT.BaintonC.2000: From unemployment to self-employment: the role of microfinance, London: International Labour Organization.
17.
MooneyA.KnightA.MossP.OwenC.2001: Who cares? Childminding in the 1990s, London: Family Policy Studies Centre for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
18.
Social Exclusion Unit1998: Bringing Britain together: a national strategy for neighbourhood renewal Cm 4045, London: The Stationery Office.
19.
SpeakS.2000: Barriers to lone parent employment: looking beyond the obvious, Local Economy, Vol. 15 No. 1, 32–44
20.
TurnerJ.GriecoM.AptN.HolmesL.2000: Looking to initiatives in communications technology to overcome social exclusion and gender inequalities, Local Economy, Vol. 15 No. 1), 68–73
21.
WalkerD.2001: Nursery stakes, Guardian, 1st May, 17.
22.
West Midlands Low Pay Unit1998/99: Annual report ‘15 and fighting’, Birmingham: West Midlands Low Pay Unit.
23.
WhyleyC.1998: Risky business: the personal and financial costs of small business failure, London: Policy Studies Institute.
24.
WOOD END, HENLEY GREEN, MANOR FARM AND DEEDMORE NEW DEAL FOR COMMUNITIES PARTNERSHIP2001: Our future in our hands: delivery plan for submission to the Government Office for the West Midlands, Coventry: New Deal for Communities.
