This paper explores user and provider experiences with broadband networks. Drawing on data from an early broadband trial and from recent studies of consumer broadband usage, the validity of the commonly held view that widespread adoption of broadband is dependent upon the development of a killer application is challenged. It is argued that access to broadband can be valuable for users without the provision of a killer application and that the dynamics of broadband development are shifting. As more users become content creators and distributors and as it becomes easier for consumers to establish broadband networks without help from traditional providers, the existing relationships within the broadband industry will change. Broadband researchers and stakeholders in the development of broadband networks are encouraged to explore and understand the implications of these changes, recognizing that there is much to be learned about deploying broadband in ways that will create the broad societal benefits promised by its promoters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonB., GaleC., JonesM.L.R., and McWilliamA. (2001). Domesticating broadband – what consumers really do with flat-rate, always-on and fast Internet access. BT Technology Journal, 20(1), 103–14.
2.
BartschF.-R., and AuerE. (1997). Lessons learned from multimedia field trials in Germany. IEEE Communications Magazine, 35(10), 40–5.
3.
BeardsleyS., DomanA., and EdinP. (2003). Making sense of broadband. The McKinsey Quarterly, Number 2.
4.
BlackwellR. (2003). Music industry struggling to tune in on-line profits. Globe and Mail, 12 July, B1.
5.
BrodeurR., and AgarwalK. (1996). Bell Canada trials provide high bandwidth for interactive, multimedia, and Internet services. Telesis, issue 102, 41–2.
6.
Brunel–DTI (2002). Investigating broadband technology deployment in South Korea: International Technology Services Mission to South Korea, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
7.
CarlyleP. (2002). Content is king in battle to find killer application. The Scotsman, 28 March, 5.
ChangS., LeeH., and MiddletonC. (2003). The deployment of broadband Internet in Australia: areas for attention and implications from Canada and Korea. In Proceedings of the International Telecommunications Society Asia-Australasian Regional Conference, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.
10.
ColvinG. (2002). The 75-year-old killer app. Fortune, 146, 76.
11.
CopelandM.V., and MalikO. (2002). Jilted by broadband. Red Herring, 13 February.
12.
DeLoneW.H., and McLeanE.R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.
13.
DeSanctisG., and PooleM.S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–47.
14.
DesmondN. (2003). Let's underwrite broadband. Business 2.0, February.
15.
De Sola PoolI. (1977). The Social Impact of the Telephone (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
16.
DholakiaR.R. (1996). Taking movies-on-demand to market. In New Infotainment Technologies in the Home: Demand-side Perspectives, DholakiaR.R., MundorfN., and DholakiaN. (eds) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 75–88.
17.
Di ConcettoM., PavaraniG., RosaC., and RossiF. (1999). AMUSE: advanced broadband services trials for residential users. IEEE Network, 13(2), 37–45.
18.
DwivediY.K., and ChoudrieJ. (2003). Investigating the impact of broadband upon the users on-line habits and the usage of Internet services. In Proceedings of the International Telecommunications Society Asia-Australasian Regional Conference, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.
19.
FergusonC.H. (2002). The US Broadband Problem (Policy Brief 105), Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
20.
FischerC.S. (1992). America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
HeinzlM. (2001). Broadband carriers are hunting for ‘killer apps’. Wall Street Journal, 14 June, B10.
23.
HorriganJ.B., and RainieL. (2002). The Broadband Difference: How Online Americans’ Behavior Changes with High-speed Internet Connections at Home, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC.
24.
HowellB. (2003). A New Zealand response to the United States ‘broadband problem’. In Proceedings of the International Telecommunications Society Asia-Australasian Regional Conference, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.
JonesS. (2002). The Internet Goes to College, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC.
27.
LeeH., O'KeefeR.M., and YunK. (2003). The growth of broadband and electronic commerce in South Korea: contributing factors. The Information Society, 19(1), 81–93.
28.
LenhartA., RainieL., and LewisO. (2001). Teenage Life Online: The Rise of the Instant-message Generation and the Internet's Impact on Friendships and Family Relationships, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC.
29.
LessigL. (2002). Who's holding back broadband?Washington Post, 8 January, A17.
30.
MaddenM., and LenhartA. (2003). Music Downloading, File-sharing and Copyright: Project Data Memo, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC.
31.
MarronK. (2003). Wifi hot spots start to sizzle. Globe and Mail, 25 March, E1.
32.
MasonC. (1997). High hopes drowned in dollars. America's Network, 15 November, 16.
33.
MiddletonC.A. (2002a). Content and connectivity: competing perspectives on success in a residential broadband network trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, Toronto.
34.
MiddletonC.A. (2002b). Who needs a ‘killer app'? Two perspectives on content in residential broadband networks. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 34(2), 67–81.
35.
MiddletonC.A. (2002c). Learning from the Netcom trial: implications for the deployment of residential broadband networks. In HurtM.E. (ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Administrative Studies Association of Canada, ASAC Information Systems Division, Winnipeg, MB, pp. 70–80.
36.
MilesM., and HubermanA.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
37.
NorrisA. (2001). Content caught off-side. The Guardian, 25 October (on-line edition).
38.
OdlyzkoA. (2001). Content is not king. First Monday, 6(2).
39.
OlijnykZ. (2002). Matchmaker, matchmaker, make me a bundle. Canadian Business, 75, 54–9.
40.
OrlikowskiW.J., and IaconoC.S. (2001). Research commentary: desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research – a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–34.
41.
PrasadP. (1993). Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: a symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1400–29.
42.
RathK., Wanigasekara-MohottiD., WendorfR.G., and VermaD.C. (1997). Interactive digital video networks: lessons from a commercial deployment. IEEE Communications Magazine, 35(6), 70–4.
43.
RogersE.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn, The Free Press, New York.
44.
RowlandW. (1999). Spirit of the Web: The Age of Information from Telegraph to Internet, revised edn, Patrick Crean Editions, Toronto.
45.
SawyerS., AllenJ.P., and LeeH. (2003). Broadband and mobile opportunities: a socio-technical perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 18, 121–36.
46.
SeddonP.B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–53.
47.
SmithM.W., and LeungH.-T. (2002). Finding the killer application — the role of the broadband applications laboratory. BT Technology Journal, 20(1), 11–21.
48.
TesorieroH.W. (2003). A friendlier way to date online. Time, 161, 84.
49.
UCLA Center for Communication Policy (2000). The UCLA Internet Report – ‘Surveying the Digital Future’, UC Regents, Los Angeles.
50.
UCLA Center for Communication Policy (2001). The UCLA Internet Report 2001 – ‘Surveying the Digital Future’, UC Regents, Los Angeles.
51.
UCLA Center for Communication Policy (2003). The UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future Year 3, UC Regents, Los Angeles.
52.
VollmerA. (1995). France Telecom rolls out information highway trial. Electronics, 68(6), 8.
