This paper analyses how Nick Leeson exploited information technology (IT) in order to trade without authority and thereby causing Barings Bank to collapse. What emerges suggests that, not only can IT systems enable malfeasance on a large scale, but that very little specialist knowledge is required in order to turn the computer into an accomplice. The most disturbing feature of the Barings Bank debacle is the contrast between the mundane act of suppressing a control mechanism and the consequences that flowed from this act. It is argued that organizational security ultimately lies in knowing the limits of one's information.
Board of Banking Supervision (1995). Report of the Inquiry into the Circumstances of the Collapse of Barings (HMSO, London).
3.
BrownR.H. (1977). A Poetic for Sociology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
4.
BrownR.H. (1989). Social Science as Civic Discourse (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
5.
ChownM. (1996). What's logic got to do with it. New Scientist, July, 40–2.
6.
CleggS.R. (1989). Radical revisions: power discipline and organisations. Organisation Studies, 10, 97–115.
7.
DaltonM. (1959). Men Who Manage (Wiley, New York).
8.
De BonoE. (1978). Opportunities (Associated Business Programmes, London).
9.
DrummondH. (1991). Power: Creating It, Using It (Kogan Page, London).
10.
DrummondH. (2001). The Art of Decision Making: Mirrors of Imagination, Masks of Science (Wiley, Chichester).
11.
FayS. (1996). The Collapse of Barings (Arrow, London).
12.
GagliardiP. (1996). Exploring the aesthetic side of organisational life. In Handbook of Organisation Studies, CleggS.R., HardyC., and NordW.R. (eds) (Sage, London).
13.
GapperJ., and DentonN. (1996). All that Glitters: the Fall of Barings (Penguin, Harmondsworth).
14.
GiddensA. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory (Macmillan, London).
15.
HatchM. (1999). Exploring the empty spaces of organisation: how improvisational jazz helps re-describe organisation studies. Organisation Studies, 20, 75–101.
16.
HedbergB., and JonsonnS. (1977). Strategy formulation as a discontinuous process. International Studies of Management and Organisation, 7, 88–109.
17.
LaudonK.C., and LaudonJ.P. (1999). Essentials of Management Information Systems (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ).
18.
LeesonN. (1996). Rogue Trader (Warner, London).
19.
MechanicD. (1962). Sources of power of lower participants in complex organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 349–64.
20.
Ministry for Finance, Singapore (1995). Baring Futures (Singapore) Pte Ltd: The Report of the Inspectors Appointed by the Minister for Finance.
RossJ. (1997). Rogue Trader: How I Brought Down Barings’ Bank and Shook the Financial World, by Nick Leeson, Boston: Little Brown, 1996. Academy of Management Review, 22, 1006–10.
23.
StarbuckW.H. (1983). Organisations as action generators. American Sociological Review, 48, 91–102.
24.
SteinM. (2000). The risk taker as shadow: a psychoanalytic view of the collapse of Barings Bank. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 1215–29.
25.
SterbaR.L.A. (1978). Clandestine management in the imperial Chinese bureaucracy. Academy of Management Review, 3, 67–78.
26.
WatzlawickP. (1976). How Real is Real? (Norton, New York).
27.
WatzlawickP., WeaklandJ.H., and FrishR. (1974). Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Resolution (Norton, New York).
28.
WeickK.E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organising (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA).
29.
WeickK.E. (1985). Cosmos vs. chaos: sense and nonsense in electronic contexts. Organisational Dynamics, 14, 50–64.
30.
WeickK.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organisations (Sage, London).
31.
WingR.L. (1988). The Tao of Power (Thorson, London).
32.
WrongD.H. (1979). Power: Forms, Bases and Uses (Blackwell, Oxford).
