This paper seeks to advance our understanding of the dynamics of persistence and change in information systems development. Towards this goal, it draws upon dialectical theory, which enables viewing persistence and change during IS development relative to the thesis operating at that time. This approach recognizes that the nature of the system itself often changes during the development process. This also allows simultaneous attention to persistence and change, combining persistence with certain elements of the thesis along with change in some other elements. Empirically based on three cases, the paper provides insights into the content and process elements of theses, governing the characteristics of the system and the nature of the development process, respectively. It offers one possible explanation for the evolution of the IS development process and some insights into the strategies for improving this process through greater attention to the theses and the dialectic processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BacharachS.B., BambergerP., and SonnenstuhlW.J. (1996). The organizational transformation process: the micropolitics of dissonance reduction and the alignment of logics of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 477–506.
2.
BanburyJ., and NahapietJ.E. (1979). Towards a framework for the study of the antecedents and consequences of information systems in organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 4(3), 163–77.
BensonJ.K. (1983). A dialectical method for the study of organizations. In Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, MorganG. (ed.) (Sage Publications, London), pp. 331–46.
6.
BolandR.J.Jr. (1978). The process and product of system design. Management Science, 24, 887–98.
7.
BuchananD., BoddyD., and McCalmanJ. (1988). Getting in, getting on, getting out, and getting back. In Doing Research in Organizations, BrymanA. (ed.) (Routledge, London), pp. 53–67.
8.
ChurchmanC.W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization (Basic Books, New York).
9.
CohenM., MarchJ., and OlsenJ. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 1–25.
10.
CyertR.M., and MarchJ.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
11.
D'AndradeP., and JohnsonD. (1983). Dialectics and trialectics: a comparison of two analyses of change. In Trialectics: Toward a Practical Logic of Unity, HornR. (ed.) (Information Resources, Lexington, MA), pp. 79–119.
12.
DyerW.G., and WilkinsA. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16, 613–19.
13.
EdströmA. (1977). User influence and the success of MIS projects: a contingency approach. Human Relations, 30(7), 589–607.
14.
FindlayJ.N. (1958). Hegel: A Re-examination (Humanities Press, Inc., New York).
15.
FordJ.D., and FordL.W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction, and interaction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 756–85.
16.
GlickW.H., HuberG.P., MillerC.C., DotyD.H., and SutcliffeK.M. (1990). Studying changes in organizational design and effectiveness: retrospective event histories and periodic assessments. Organization Science, 1, 293–312.
17.
HabermasJ. (1976). The analytical theory of science and dialectics. In The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, AdornoT. (ed.) (Heinemann, London), pp. 131–62 (translated by G. Adey and D. Frisby).
18.
HageJ., and AikenM. (1970). Social Change in Complex Organizations (Random House, New York).
19.
HoulgateS. (1991). Freedom, Truth, and History: An Introduction to Hegel's Philosophy (Routledge, New York).
20.
KeenP. (1981). Information systems and organizational change. Communications of the ACM, 24(1), 24–33.
21.
KlingR. (1980). Social analyses of computing: theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Computing Surveys, 12(1), 61–110.
22.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
23.
LincolnY.S., and GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic Enquiry (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
24.
MarchJ.G. (1996). Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 278–87.
25.
MarkusM.L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26, 430–44.
26.
MarkusM.L., AxlineS., PetrieD., and TanisC. (2000). Learning from adopters’ experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved. Journal of Information Technology, 15(4), 245–65.
27.
MasonR.O. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Science, 15, B403–14.
28.
MasonR.O. (1996). Commentary on varieties of dialectic change processes. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(3), 293–9.
29.
MasonR.O., and MitroffI.I. (1981). Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases and Techniques (John Wiley, New York).
30.
NewmanM., and NobleF. (1990). User involvement as an interaction process: a case study. Information Systems Research, 1(1), 89–113.
31.
NewmanM., and SabherwalR. (1996). Determinants of commitment to information system development: a longitudinal investigation. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 23–54.
32.
OrlikowskiW.J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 309–40.
33.
OrlikowskiW.J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92.
34.
Oxford American Dictionary (1980). Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
35.
PettigrewA.M. (1992). The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 5–16.
36.
PfefferJ. (1982). Organizations and Organization Theory (Pitman, Marshfield, MA).
37.
RichardsonS.M., and CourtneyJ.F. (1999). An electric utility learns to adapt: a Singerian organization approach. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, WI, 13–15 August 1999, NazarethD., and GoodhueD. (eds) (The Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA), pp. 653–55.
38.
RobeyD., and BoudreauM. (1999). Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 167–86.
39.
SrinivasanA., and DavisJ. (1987). A reassessment of implementation process models. Interfaces, 17(3), 64–71.
40.
SwansonE.B. (1988). Information System Implementation (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL).
41.
SwingT.K. (1969). Kant's Transcedental Logic (Yale University Press, London).
42.
Van de VenA.H., and PooleM.S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–40.
43.
Van MaanenJ. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539–50.
