This paper presents a critical approach to the way organizations justify adopting enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. An earlier critical theory provides a framework for exploring the themes of communication, rationality and domination. Technology, process and organization are forms of domination that may appear in the context of ERP adoption. The literature on the formal and informal (qualitative) justification of information technology investment is reviewed and assessed. The significance of ERP systems is examined and also motives for their adoption. The data used for the study are electronically mediated justifications of ERP adoption that were presented by universities. A content analysis is applied to these data. The paper concludes that, despite reservations about the sensitivity of domination and emancipation to identification and measurement, there is some evidence to suggest people are considered to occupy a subservient role to technology, process and organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvarezR. (2000). Examining an ERP implementation through myths: a case study of a large public organization. In Americas Conference on Information Systems, Los Angeles. Published on CD-ROM, pp. 1655–1661.
BaconC.J. (1992). The use of decision criteria in selecting information systems/technology investments. MIS Quarterly, 16(3) 355–50.
4.
BallantineJ.A., GalliersR.A., and StrayS.J. (1999). InInformation Systems/Technology: Evaluation Practices. Beyond The IT Productivity Paradox, WillcocksL.P., and LesterS. (eds) (John Wiley).
5.
BellJ. (1993). Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First Time Researchers in Education and Social Science (Open University Press, Milton Keynes).
6.
BenbasatI., GoldsteinD., and MeadM. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–86.
7.
BingiP., SharmaM.K., and GodlaJ.K. (1999). Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Information Systems Management, Summer, 7–14.
8.
BoudreauM., and RobeyD. (1999). Organizational transition to enterprise resource planning systems: theoretical choices for process research. In International Conference on Information Systems, Charlotte, NC.
Central Queensland University (1999a). UniNews WEEKLY, 256.
11.
Central Queensland University (1999b). UniNews WEEKLY, 266.
12.
DeetzS. (1992). InDisciplinary Power in the Modern Corporation. Critical Management Studies, AlvessonM., and WillmottH. (eds) (Sage), pp. 21–45.
13.
Duke University (1996). Report of the Strategic Planning Committee.
14.
EisenhartK.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–50.
15.
FarbeyB., LandF., and TargettD. (1992). Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7, 109–22.
16.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (trans. A. Sheridan) (Vintage, New York).
17.
GadamerH.G. (1993). Truth and Method (Continuum, New York).
18.
GeertzC. (1983). Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (Basic Books, New York).
19.
GubaE.G., and LincolnY.S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation (Sage).
20.
HabermasJ. (1971). Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics (Heinemann, London).
21.
HabermasJ. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and The Rationalization of Society (Beacon Press, Boston).
22.
HallR.H. (1977). Organizations: Structure and Process (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
23.
HansethO., CiborraC.U., and BraaK. (2001). The control devolution: ERP and the side effects of globalization. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(4), 34–46.
24.
HillS. (1988). The Tragedy of Technology: Human Liberation Versus Domination in the Late Twentieth Century (Pluto Press, London).
25.
HochstrasserB., and GriffithsC. (1991). Controlling IT Investment Strategy and Management (Chapman & Hall).
26.
IaconoS., and KlingR. (2001). Computerization movements: the rise of the Internet and distant forms of work. In Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric, and Practice, YatesJ., and Van MaanenJ. (eds) (Sage Publications), pp. 93–135.
27.
IsenbergD.J. (1988). In How Senior Managers Think. Decision Making Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, BellD.E., RaiffaH., and TverskyA. (eds) (Cambridge University Press), pp. 525–39.
28.
JensonR.L., and JohnsonR.I. (1999). The enterprise resource planning system as a strategic solution. Information Strategy, 15(4), 28–33.
29.
JurisonJ. (1996). Toward more effective management of information technology benefits. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5, 263–74.
30.
KeatsB.W. (1991). Research notes and communications: an empirical investigation of strategic decision models. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 243–50.
31.
KhazanchiD., and MunkvoldB. (2000). Is information systems a science? An inquiry into the nature of the information systems discipline. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 31(3), 24–42.
32.
KingM., and McAulayL. (1997). Information technology investment evaluation: evidence and interpretations. Journal of Information Technology, 12, 131–43.
33.
KlingR., and IaconoS. (1984). The control of information systems developments after implementation. Communications of the ACM, 27(12), 1218–26.
34.
KlingR., and ScacchiW. (1982). InThe Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization. Advances in Computers, Vol. 21, YovitsM. (ed.) (Academic Press, New York), pp. 1–90.
35.
KrippendorfK. (1980). Content Analysis (Sage).
36.
KumarK., and Van HillegersbergJ. (2000). ERP experiences and evolution. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 22–26.
37.
LangleyA. (1989). In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 598–631.
38.
LaudonK.C., and LaudonJ.R. (1984). Management Information Systems – Organization and Technology (Macmillan, New York).
39.
LeeA.S. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 33–50.
40.
LyytinenK.J., and KleinH.K. (1985). The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems, MumfordE., HirschheimR., FitzgeraldG., and Wood-HarperT. (eds) (Elsevier Science Publishers BV, North-Holland, pp. 219–36.
41.
McClureJ. (1991). Explanations, Accounts, and Illusions: A Critical Analysis (Cambridge University Press).
42.
MarchJ.G. (1988). Rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. In Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, BellD.E., RaiffaH., and TverskyA. (eds) (Cambridge University Press), pp. 33–57.
43.
MarcuseH. (1970). One Dimensional Man (Sphere Books, London).
44.
MarkusM.L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430–44.
45.
MarkusM.L., PetrieD., and AxlineS. (2000). Bucking the trends: what the future may hold for ERP packages. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 181–93.
46.
MeyerJ.W., and RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–63.
47.
MillsC.W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–13.
48.
MintzbergH., RaisinghaniD., and TheoretA. (1976). The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246–75.
49.
MumbyD.K. (1988). Communication and Power in Organizations: Discourse, Ideology – and Domination (Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ).
50.
OliverC. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–79.
51.
OrlikowskiW.J., and BaroudiJ. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.
52.
PfefferJ. (1981). Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 3, 1–52.
53.
PowellP. (1992). Information technology evaluation: is it different?Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(1), 29–42.
54.
RandsT. (1992). The key role of applications software make-or-buy decisions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(4), 215–23.
55.
RemenyiD., WilliamsB., MoneyA., and SwartzE. (1998). Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method (Sage).
56.
RossJ.W. (1999). The ERP Revolution: Surviving Versus Thriving (Sloan School of Management, Center for Information Systems Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
57.
SarkerS., and LeeA.S. (2000). Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation. In 21st International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia.
58.
SchrammW. (1971). Notes on Case Studies of Instructional Media Projects (Academy for Educational Development. Washington, DC).
59.
SchroyerT. (1975). The Critique of Domination (Beacon Paperback, Boston).
60.
SheppardJ. (1990). The strategic management of IT investment decisions: a research note. British Journal of Management, 1, 171–81.
61.
SteinerG. (1979). Strategic Planning (Free Press, New York).
62.
StoneD. (1991). Language, training and information systems assessment. Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 1(1), 91–108.
63.
SumnerM. (1999). Critical Success Factors in Enterprise Wide Information Management Systems Projects (ACM SIGCPR, New Orleans).
64.
SymonsV. (1990). Evaluation of information systems: IS development in the processing company. Journal of Information Technology, 5, 194–204.
University of Nebraska (1996). Administrative Systems Project.
69.
University of New South Wales (1998). Request for Information for the Supply of an Integrated Administrative System.
70.
VitaleM., and JohnstonK. (1997). Management processes: evaluating IT investments. In Managing the Introduction of Technology in the Delivery and Administration of Higher Education, YettonP. (ed.) (DEETYA), pp. 81–99.
71.
WardJ. (1994). A Portfolio Approach to Evaluating Information Systems Investments and Setting Priorities. Information Management: The Evaluation of Information Systems Investments (Chapman & Hall).
72.
WeillP., and OlsonM. (1989). Managing investment in information technology: min case examples and implications.13(1), 2–17.
73.
WillcocksL., and SmithG. (1995). IT-enabled business process reengineering: organizational and human resource dimensions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4(3), 279–301.
74.
WillcocksL.P., and SykesR. (2000). The role of the CIO and IT function in ERP. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 32–38.
75.
WilliamsL. (1998). Wives, Mistresses and Matriarchs (Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, NSW, Australia).
76.
YinR.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications).
