This study used an earlier critique of the cultural sciences for exploring the ideological basis for the evaluation of outsourcing. Questionnaire and interview responses are presented. These incorporate a range of evaluative criteria, which together represent an indicative list of the benefits and risks of outsourcing. The paper initially suggests that different stakeholders might be impacted on in different ways by benefits and risks. It is suggested that information technology outsourcing evaluation might thus be partial and not neutral in its impact on stakeholders. However, the differences and similarities between stakeholders suggest a subtle interplay of ideological concerns that does not totally deny the interests of all but the dominant stakeholders. Although the evaluation may be partial this does not deny the potential for those who might be presumed to be disadvantaged for making personal gains. However, in making personal gains, an ideology based on economic interests is furthered, thus occluding the opportunity for autonomous and responsible engagement with the process of evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldP.J., and OakesL.S. (1998). Accounting as discursive construction: the relationship between Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106 and the dismantling of retiree health benefits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(2), 129–53.
2.
BarskyN.P., HusseinM.E., and JablonskyS.F. (1999). Shareholder and stakeholder value in corporate downsizing: the case of United Technologies Corporation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(5), 583–604.
3.
BestS., and KellnerD. (1991). Postmodern Theory (Macmillan, London).
4.
BottomoreT. (1984). The Frankfurt School (Tavistock, London).
5.
BrunssonN. (1985). The Irrational Organization: Irrationality as a Basis for Organizational Action and Change (John Wiley, Chichester).
6.
ButlerJ. (2000). Winning the Outsourcing Game: Making The Best Deals and Making Them Work (Auerback CRC, London).
7.
CrossJ. (1995). IT outsourcing: British Petroleum's competitive approach. Harvard Business Review, 73, 95–102.
8.
CurrieW.L. (1995). Management Strategy for Information Technology (Pitman, London).
EarlM.J. (1996). The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Review, 37(3), 26–32.
12.
FarbeyB., LandF., and TargettD. (1992). Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7, 109–22.
13.
FarbeyB., LandF., and TargettD. (1999). Moving IS evaluation forward: learning themes and research issues. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8, 189–207.
14.
GeussR. (1981). The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
15.
HabermasJ. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests (Heinemann, London) (translated by J.J. Shapiro).
16.
HarréR. (1998). The Singular Self: An Introduction to the Psychology of Personhood (Sage, London).
17.
HeldD. (1980). Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
18.
HuberR.L. (1993). How Continental Bank outsourced its ‘crown jewels’. Harvard Business Review, 71, 121–9.
19.
KaplanR.S., and AtkinsonA.A. (1998). Advanced management accounting, 3rd edn (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
20.
KhandpurN.K., and LaubL. (1997). Delivering World-class Technical Support (John Wiley, Chichester).
21.
KingW.R., and MalhotraY. (2000). Developing a framework for analyzing IS outsourcing. Information and Management, 37, 323–34.
22.
LacityM.C., and HirschheimR. (1993). Information Systems Outsourcing: Myths, Metaphors and Realities (John Wiley, Chichester).
23.
LacityM.C., and HirschheimR. (1995). Beyond the Information Systems Outsourcing Bandwagon (John Wiley, Chichester).
24.
LacityM.C., WillcocksL.P., and FeenyD.F. (1995). IT outsourcing: maximize flexibility and control. Harvard Business Review, 73, 85–93.
25.
LangleyA., MintzbergH., PitcherP., PosadaE., and Saint-MacaryJ. (1995). Opening up decision making: the view from the black stool. Organization Science, 6(3), 260–79.
26.
LawI. (1999). Harnessing Outsourcing for Business Advantage (Financial Times, Prentice Hall, London).
27.
LedererA.L., and MiraniR. (1995). Anticipating the Benefits of Proposed Information Systems. Journal of Information Technology, 10, 159–69.
28.
LyytinenK. (1992). Information systems and critical theory. In Critical Management Studies, AlvessonM., and WillmottH. (eds) (Sage, London), pp. 159–80.
29.
McAulayL., and TomkinsC.R. (1992). A review of contemporary transfer pricing literature with recommendations for future research. British Journal of Management, 3, 101–22.
30.
MacintoshN.B. (1991). Annual reports in an ideological role: a critical theory analysis. In Critical Accounts, CooperD.J., and HopperT.M. (eds) (Macmillan, London), pp. 153–72.
31.
MephamJ. (1994). The theory of ideology in Capital. Reprinted in Ideology, EagletonT. (ed.) (Longman, London), pp. 211–37.
32.
MilesM.B., and HubermanA.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
33.
NgwenyamaO.K., and LeeA.S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21, 145–66.
34.
PfefferJ. (1981). Power in Organizations (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA).
35.
SargentL.T. (1972). Contemporary Political Ideologies (Dorsey, Homewood, IL).
36.
SingerA.E. (1994). DCF without forecasts. Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 22(3), 221–34.
37.
SmithsonS., and HirschheimR. (1998). Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem. European Journal of Information Systems, 7, 158–74.
38.
WalshamG. (1991). Organizational metaphors and information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 83–94.
39.
WillcocksL.P., and LacityM.C. (eds) (1998). Strategic Sourcing of Information Systems: Perspectives and Practices (John Wiley, Chichester).
40.
WillcocksL.P., LacityM.C., and KernT. (1999). Risk mitigation in IT outsourcing strategy revisited: longitudinal case research at LISA. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8, 285–314.
41.
WilsonA., DaviesM., CurtisM., and Wilkinson-RiddleG. (2001). UK & International GAAP, 7th edn (Butterworths Tolley, London).
