This paper undertakes a preliminary review of the state of critical thinking in the fields of information systems and organizational analysis. It begins by addressing the question ‘what is critical research?’ showing how the definition has changed and broadened over time. Two key themes emerge from this discussion: our understanding of emancipation and the nature of unequal power relations in the workplace. The paper then goes on to identify a recent emerging tendency towards the use of Habermas in the specific area of critical IS inquiry. It considers some of the reasons for this apparent trend and warns against becoming locked into a particular discourse. The paper concludes with some thoughts on how we can continue to broaden our frameworks of thinking, illustrating this with reference to the work of Foucault.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckroydS., and ThompsonP. (1999). Organizational Misbehaviour (Sage, London).
2.
AlvessonM., and DeetzS. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research (Sage, London).
3.
AlvessonM., and WillmottH. (eds.) (1992). Critical Management Studies (Sage, London).
4.
AlvessonM., and WillmottH. (1996). Making Sense of Management: a critical introduction (Sage, London).
5.
AshendenS., and OwenD. (eds.) (1999). Foucault contra Habermas (Sage, London).
6.
BeirneM., RamsayH., and PanteliA. (1998). Developments in Computing Work: control and contradiction in the software labour process. In ThompsonP., and WarhurstC. (eds.) Workplaces of the Future. (Macmillan Business, Basingstoke), 142–62.
CleggS.R. (2001). Changing Concepts of Power, Changing Concepts of Politics. Available online at: aom.pace.edu/cms/Washington/clegg.htm
9.
ConwayD.W. (1999). Pas de Deux: Habermas and Foucault in Genealogical Communication. In AshendenS., and OwenD. (eds.) Foucault contra Habermas, (Sage, London), 60–89.
10.
DeanM. (1999). Normalising Democracy: Foucault and Habermas on democracy, liberalism and law. In AshendenS., and OwenD. (eds.) Foucault contra Habermas, (Sage, London), 166–94.
11.
FlemingP. (2001). Beyond the Panopticon? Book Review of Organizational Misbehaviour by Ackroyd and Thompson (1999). Ephemera, 1, 2, 190–4.
12.
FoucaultM. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge (Rout-ledge, London).
13.
HabermasJ. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society; Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. (Heinemann, London).
14.
HeideggerM. (1962). Being and Time (Blackwell, Oxford).
15.
JacksonM.C. (2000). Systems Approaches to Management (Kluwer, New York).
16.
KleinH.K., and HirschheimR. (1991). Rationality Concepts in Information System Development Methodologies. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1, 2, 157–87.
17.
LyytinenK. (1992). Information Systems and Critical Theory. In AlvessonM., and WillmottH. (eds.) Critical Management Studies. (Sage, London), 159–80.
18.
LyytinenK., and KleinH.K. (1985). The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas as a Basis for a Theory of Information Systems, in MumfordE. (eds.) (Elsevier Science, North-Holland), 207–25.
19.
MingersJ. (1992). Technical, Practical and Critical OR: past, present and future? In AlvessonM., and WillmottH. (eds.) Critical Management Studies. (Sage, London), 90–112.
20.
ReedM. (1993). Organizations and Modernity: continuity and discontinuity in organization theory. In HassardJ., and ParkerM. (eds.) Postmodernism and Organisations. (Sage, London), 163–82.
21.
ScarbroughH., and CorbettJ. M. (1992). Technology and Organization: power, meaning and design. (Routledge, London).
22.
TullyJ. (1999). To Think and Act Differently. In AshendenS., and OwenD. (eds.) Foucault contra Habermas. (Sage, London), 90–142.
23.
Valero-SilvaN. (1996). A Foucauldian Reflection on Critical Systems Thinking. In FloodR., and RommN. (eds.) Critical Systems Thinking: current research and practice. (Plenum Press, New York), 63–79.
24.
Valero-SilvaN. (2001). Demystifying the Theory and Practice of Critical Systems Thinking. In WilbyJ., and AllenJ.K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences.Asilomar, California, July 8–13.
25.
WalshamG. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester).
26.
WillmottH. (1993). Breaking the Paradigm Mentality. Information and Organization, 14, 5, 681–719.
