This paper critiques the perspective that information technology can play a central role in knowledge-sharing processes. Fundamentally, it suggests that the nature of knowledge itself makes it extremely difficult and that quite specific conditions are required for information technology-based knowledge sharing to occur successfully. The paper proceeds by criticizing the objectivist philosophy of knowledge, which typically underpins the literature advocating information technology-based knowledge management. The centre point of this critique involves questioning one of the foundational assumptions of the objectivist perspective, namely the dichotomy made between tacit and explicit knowledge. Instead, a ‘practice‘-based philosophy of knowledge is proposed that suggests that all knowledge has both tacit and explicit components, is to some extent embodied in human brains and bodies and is embedded in organizational routines, practices and contexts. These characteristics therefore suggest that the role of information technology systems in the sharing of knowledge is likely to be somewhat limited.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnesB. (1977). Interests and the Growth of Knowledge (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
2.
BaumardP. (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Organizations (Sage, London).
3.
BlacklerF. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–46.
4.
BoisotM., and GriffithsD. (1999). Possession is nine tenths of the law: managing a firm's knowledge base in a regime of weak appropriability. International Journal of Technology Management, 17(6), 662–76.
5.
BolandR., and TenkasiR. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350–72.
6.
BolandR., TenkasiR., and Te'eniD. (1994). Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organization Science, 5(3), 456–75.
7.
BolisaniE., and ScarsoE. (1999). Information technology management: a knowledge based perspective. Technovation, 19, 209–17.
8.
BolisaniE., and ScarsoE. (2000). Electronic communication and knowledge transfer. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(1/2), 116–33.
9.
BrownJ., and DuguidP. (1991). Organization learning and communities of practice: towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.
10.
BrownJ., and DuguidP. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 90–113.
11.
ClarkP. (2000). Organizations in Action: Competition Between Contexts (Routledge, London).
12.
CollinsH. (1985). Replicating the TEA laser: maintaining scientific knowledge. In Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, CollinsH. (ed.) (Sage, London), pp. 51–78.
13.
CookS., and BrownJ. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
14.
DavisJ., and StackM. (1993). Knowledge in production. Race & Class, 34(3), 1–14.
15.
DeFillippiR., and ArthurM. (1998). Paradox in project based enterprise: the case of filmaking. California Management Review, 40(2), 125–39.
16.
EmpsonL. (2001). Introduction: knowledge management in professional service firms. Human Relations, 54(7), 811–17.
17.
FloodP., TurnerT., RamamoorthyN., and PearsonJ. (2001). Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(7), 1152–60.
18.
GherardiS. (2000). Practice based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–33.
19.
GherardiS., NicoliniD., and OdellaF. (1998). Towards a social understanding of how people learn in organizations: the notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning, 29(3), 273–97.
20.
GottschalkP. (2000). Predictors of IT support for knowledge management in the professions: an empirical study of law firms in Norway. Journal of Information Technology, 15, 69–78.
21.
GrantR. (1996). Towards a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–22.
22.
HayesN., and WalshamG. (2000). Safe enclaves, political enclaves and knowledge working. In Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning, PrichardC, HullR., ChumerM., and WillmottH. (eds) (Macmillan, London), pp. 69–87.
23.
HedlundG. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 73–90.
24.
JarvenpaaS., and LeidnerD. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.
25.
JohannessenJ.-A., OliasenJ., and OlsenB. (2001). Management of tacit knowledge: the importance of tacit knowledge, the danger of information technology, and what to do about it. International Journal of Information Management, 21, 3–20.
26.
KimW., and MauborgneR. (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 323–38.
27.
KogutB., and ZanderU. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–97.
28.
LamA. (1997). Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: problems in collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures. Organization Studies, 18(6), 973–96.
29.
LamA. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), 487–513.
30.
LaveJ., and WengerE. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
31.
LeonardD., and SensiperS. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112–32.
32.
Leonard-BartonD. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).
33.
LiedtkaJ. (1999). Linking competitive advantage with communities of practice. Journal of Management Enquiry, 8(1), 5–16.
34.
McAdamR., and McCreedyS. (2000). A critique of knowledge management: using a social constructivist model. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(2), 155–68.
35.
McDermottR. (1999). Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103–17.
36.
MacKenzieD. (1996). Tacit knowledge and the uninvention of weapons. In Knowing Machines: Essays on Technical Change, MacKenzieD. (ed.) (MIT Press, Boston, MA).
37.
McKinlayA. (1996). Philosophers in overalls?: craft and class on Clydeside, c1900–1914. In Roots of Red Clydeside? Labour Unrest and Industrial Relations in West Scotland, KenefickW., and McIvorA. (eds) (John Donald, Edinburgh), pp. 86–106.
38.
McLoughlinI., and JacksonP. (1999). Organisational learning and the virtual organisation. In Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics, JacksonP. (ed.) (Routledge, London), pp. 178–92.
39.
MesoP., and SmithR. (2000). A resource based view of organizational knowledge management systems. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3), 224–34.
40.
NandhakumarJ. (1999). Virtual teams and lost proximity: consequences on trust relations. In Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics, JacksonP. (ed.) (Routledge, London), pp. 46–56.
41.
NewellS., ScarboroughH., SwanJ., and HislopD. (2000). Intranets and knowledge management: de-centred technologies and the limits of technological discourse. In Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning, PrichardC, HullR., ChumerM., and WillmottH. (eds) (Macmillan, London), pp. 88–106.
42.
NohriaN., and EcclesR. (1992). Face to face: making network organizations work. In Networks and Organizations, NohriaN., and EcclesR. (eds) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).
43.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
44.
NonakaI., and TakeuchiH. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
45.
OrrJ. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: war stories and community memory in a service culture. In Collective Remembering: Memory in a Society, MiddletonD., and EdwardsD. (eds) (Sage, London).
46.
PanS., and ScarbroughH. (1999). Knowledge management in practice: an exploratory case study. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(3), 359–74.
47.
PolanyiM. (1969). Knowing and Being (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
48.
PrichardC. (2000). Know, learn and share! The knowledge phenomenon and the construction of a consumptive-communicative body. In Managing Knowledge: Critical Investigations of Work and Learning, PrichardC, HullR., ChumerM., and WillmottH. (eds) (Macmillan, London), pp. 176–98.
49.
RobertsJ. (2000). From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12(4), 429–43.
50.
RugglesR. (1998). The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 80–9.
51.
ScarbroughH. (1998). Path(ological) dependency? Core competencies from an organizational perspective. British Journal of Management, 90(3), 219–32.
52.
ScarbroughH. (1999). Knowledge as work: conflicts in the management of knowledge workers. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(1), 5–16.
53.
ScarbroughH., and SwanJ. (2001). Explaining the diffusion of knowledge management: the role of fashion. British Journal of Management, 12, 3–12.
54.
ScarbroughH., SwanJ., and PrestonJ. (1999). Knowledge Management: A Literature Review (Institute of Personnel and Development, London).
55.
SørensenC., and Lundh-SnisU. (2001). Innovation through knowledge codification. Journal of Information Technology, 16(2), 83–97.
56.
SpenderJ.-C. (1996). Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(1), 63–78.
57.
StarbuckW., and MillikenF. (1988). Challenger: fine tuning the odds until something breaks. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 319–40.
58.
StoreyJ., and BarnettE. (2000). Knowledge management initiatives: learning from failure. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 145–56.
59.
StoreyJ., and QuintasP. (2001). Knowledge management and HRM. In Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, StoreyJ. (ed.) (Thomson Learning, London), pp. 339–63.
60.
SwanJ., and ScarbroughH. (2001). Editorial. Journal of Information Technology, 16(2), 49–55.
61.
SwanJ., NewellS., ScarboroughH., and HislopD. (1999). Knowledge management and innovations: networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 262–75.
62.
SymonG. (2000). Information and communication technologies and the network organization: a critical analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 389–414.
63.
SzulanskiG. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.
64.
TsoukasH. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25.
65.
TsoukasH., and VladimirouE. (2000). On organizational knowledge and its management: an ethnographic investigation. In Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, University of Warwick, 10–11 February.
66.
Von HippelE. (1994). ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–39.
