It has been suggested that, in order to maintain its relevance, critical research must develop a strong emphasis on empirical work rather than the conceptual emphasis that has typically characterized critical scholarship in management. A critical project of this nature is applicable in the information systems (IS) arena, which has a growing tradition of qualitative inquiry. Despite its relativist ontology, actor-network theory places a strong emphasis on empirical inquiry and this paper argues that actor-network theory, with its careful tracing and recording of heterogeneous networks, is well suited to the generation of detailed and contextual empirical knowledge about IS. The intention in this paper is to explore the relevance of IS research informed by actor-network theory in the pursuit of a broader critical research project as defined in earlier work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvessonM. (1999). Beyond Neo-positivists, Romantics and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Organizational Research, working paper (Lund Institute of Economic Research).
2.
AlvessonM., and DeetzS. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research (Sage, London).
3.
AlvessonM., and SkoldbergK. (2000). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (Sage, London).
4.
BaxterL. (2000). Bugged: the software development process. In Managing Knowledge, PrichardC, HullR., ChumerM., and WilmottH. (eds) (Macmillan, Basingstoke), pp. 37–48.
5.
BeirneM., RamsayH., and PanteliA. (1998). Developments in computing work: control and contradiction in the software labour process. In Workplaces of the Future, ThompsonP., and WarhurstC. (eds) (Macmillan, Basingstoke), pp. 142–62.
6.
BloomfieldB.P., and VurdubakisT. (1994). Boundary disputes: negotiating the boundary between the technical and the social in the development of IT systems. Information Technology and People, 7(1), 9–24.
7.
BloomfieldB.P., CoombsR., OwenJ., and TaylorP. (1997). Doctors as managers: constructing systems and users in the National Health Service. In Information Technology and Organizations: Strategies, Networks and Integration, BloomfieldB.P., CoombsR., KnightsD., and LittlerD. (eds) (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 112–34.
8.
BravermanH. (1974). Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (Monthly Review Press, New York).
9.
BrighamM., and CorbettM. (1997). E-mail, power and the constitution of organisational reality. New Technology, Work and Employment, 12(1), 25–35.
10.
CalasM.B., and SmircichL. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 649–71.
11.
CallonM. (1986a). The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, CallonM., LawJ., and RipA. (eds) (Macmillan, London), pp. 19–34.
12.
CallonM. (1986b). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, LawJ. (ed.) (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London), pp. 196–233.
13.
CallonM. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, LawJ. (ed.) (Routledge, London), pp. 132–61.
14.
CallonM., and LatourB. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-sociologies, Knorr-CetinaK., and CicourelA.V. (eds) (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston), pp. 277–303.
15.
CallonM., and LatourB. (1992). Don't throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley. In Science as Practice and Culture, PickeringA. (ed.) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 343–68.
16.
CallonM., and LawJ. (1982). On interests and their transformation: enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12, 615–25.
17.
CallonM., LawJ., and RipA. (1986). Putting texts in their place. In Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, CallonM., LawJ., and RipA. (eds) (Macmillan, London), pp. 221–230.
18.
CiborraC.U., and HansethO. (1998). From tool to Gestell: agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Information Technology and People, 11(4), 305–27.
19.
CollinsH., and YearleyS. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In Science as Practice and Culture, PickeringA. (ed.) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 301–26.
20.
DoolinB. (1998). Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 301–11.
21.
GillR., and GrintK. (1995). Introduction. In The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research, GrintK., and GillR. (eds) (Taylor & Francis, London), pp. 1–28.
22.
GreenE., OwenJ., and PainD. (1993). Gendered by Design? Information Technology and Office Systems (Taylor & Francis, London).
23.
HansethO., and MonteiroE. (1997). Inscribing behavior in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 7(4), 183–211.
24.
HassardJ., LawJ., and LeeN. (1999). Preface. Organization, 6(3), 387–90.
25.
HirschheimR., and KleinH.K. (1994). Realizing emancipatory principles in information systems development: the case for ETHICS. MIS Quarterly, 18(1), 83–109.
26.
HullR. (1999). Actor network and conduct: the discipline and practices of knowledge management. Organization, 6(3), 405–28.
27.
JoergesB., and CzarniawskaB. (1998). The question of technology, or how organizations inscribe the world. Organization Studies, 19(3), 363–85.
28.
KnightsD. (1995). Refocusing the case study: the politics of research and researching politics in IT management. Technology Studies, 2(2), 230–54.
29.
KnightsD., and McCabeD. (1998). ‘What happens when the phone goes wild?’ Staff, stress and spaces for escape in a BPR telephone banking work regime. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 163–94.
30.
KnightsD., and MurrayF. (1994). Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management (Wiley, Chichester).
31.
KnightsD., and WillmottH. (1988). New Technology and the Labour Process (Macmillan, Basingstoke).
32.
KnightsD., MurrayF., and WillmottH. (1997). Networking as knowledge work: a study of strategic inter-organizational development in the financial services industry. In Information Technology and Organizations: Strategies, Networks and Integration, BloomfieldB.P., CoombsR., KnightsD., and LittlerD. (eds) (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 137–59.
33.
Knorr-CetinaK. (1997). Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(4), 1–30.
34.
LatourB. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
35.
LatourB. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: the sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35(3), 298–310.
36.
LatourB. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, LawJ. (ed.) (Routledge, London), pp. 103–31.
37.
LatourB. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, BijkerW.E., and LawJ. (eds) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 225–58.
38.
LatourB. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
39.
LatourB. (1994). On technical mediation – philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2): 29–64.
40.
LatourB. (1996). Social theory and the study of computerized work sites. In Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, OrlikowskiW.J., WalshamG., JonesM.R., and DeGrossJ.I. (eds) (Chapman & Hall, London), pp. 295–307.
41.
LatourB. (1999). On recalling ANT. In Actor Network Theory and After, LawJ., and HassardJ. (eds) (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 15–25.
42.
LawJ. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, BijkerW.E., HughesT.P., and PinchT.J. (eds) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 111–34.
43.
LawJ. (1988). The anatomy of a socio-technical struggle: the design of the TSR2. In Technology and Social Process, ElliottB. (ed.) (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh), pp. 44–69.
44.
LawJ. (1991). Introduction: monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations. In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, LawJ. (ed.) (Routledge, London), pp. 1–23.
45.
LawJ. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–93.
46.
LawJ. (1999). After ANT: complexity, naming and topology. In Actor Network Theory and After, LawJ., and HassardJ. (eds) (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 1–14.
47.
LawJ. (2000). Networks, Relations, Cyborgs: On the Social Study of Technology (Centre for Science Studies and the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster. Available at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc042jl.html).
48.
LawJ., and MolA. (1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. Sociological Review, 43(2), 274–94.
49.
LeeN., and HassardJ. (1999). Organization unbound: actor-network theory, research strategy and institutional flexibility. Organization, 6(3), 391–404.
50.
LyotardJ. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).
51.
LyttinenK. (1992). Information systems and critical theory. In Critical Management Studies, AlvessonM., and WillmottH. (eds) (Sage, London), pp. 159–80.
52.
MichaelM. (1996). Constructing Identities: The Social, the Nonhuman and Change (Sage, London).
53.
MulhollandK. (1999). Back to the future: a call centre and new forms of direct control. In 17th Annual International Labour Process Conference, Royal Holloway, University of London.
NgwenyamaO.K. (1991). The critical social theory approach to information systems: problems and challenges. In Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, NissenH.-E., KleinH.K., and HirschheimR. (eds) (North-Holland, Amsterdam), pp. 267–80.
56.
NgwenyamaO.K., and LeeA.S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 145–67.
57.
OrlikowskiW.J., and BaroudiJ.J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.
58.
OrmrodS. (1995). Feminist sociology and methodology: leaky black boxes in gender/technology relations. In The Gender–Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research, GrintK., and GillR. (eds) (Taylor & Francis, London), pp. 31–47.
59.
PrestonA.M., CooperD.J., and CoombsR.W. (1992). Fabricating budgets: a study of the production of management budgeting in the National Health Service. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 561–93.
60.
PutnamH. (1978). Meaning and the Moral Sciences (Rout-ledge and Kegan Paul, London).
61.
SayerA. (1992). Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (Routledge, London).
62.
SeidmanS. (1994). The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
63.
SomervilleI. (1999). Agency versus identity: actor–network theory meets public relations. Corporate Communications, 4(1), 6–13.
64.
StarS.L. (1991). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, LawJ. (ed.) (Routledge, London), pp. 26–56.
65.
ThomasJ. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).
66.
TinkerT. (1998). Hamlet without the prince: the ethnographic turn in information systems research. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 11(1), 13–33.
67.
WajcmanJ. (1991). Feminism Confronts Technology (Allen & Unwin, North Sydney).
68.
WalshamG. (1997). Actor–Network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects. In Information Systems and Qualitative Research, LeeA.S., LiebenauJ., and DeGrossJ.I. (eds) (Chapman & Hall, London), pp. 466–80.
69.
WalshamG., and SahayS. (1999). GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 39–66.
70.
WebsterJ. (1996). Shaping Women's Work: Gender, Employment and Information Technology (Longman, London).
71.
WhitleyE.A. (1999). Habermas and the Non-humans: Towards a Critical Theory for the New Collective (Centre for Social Theory and Technology, Keele University, Keele. Available at http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/stt/cstt2/papers/whitley.htm).
72.
WiseJ.M. (1997). Exploring Technology and Social Space (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
