Global virtual teams are playing an increasingly important role in international business by offering organizations the opportunity for reaching beyond traditional boundaries. However, their use has outpaced our understanding of their dynamics and unique characteristics. For example, global, multicultural, interorganizational, virtual teams and the effective use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) present real and compelling challenges to facilitators, but they also present teams with unparalleled opportunities for expanding on perspectives, approaches and ideas. However, crossing organizational, cultural and time and distance boundaries requires training, experience and organizational support. While research shows that the development of personal relationships between virtual team members is an important factor in effective working relationships, little research has been conducted on the effects of crossing organizational, cultural and time and distance boundaries on relationship building in virtual teams. This paper reports on a field study of New Zealand-based virtual team facilitators working with boundary-spanning virtual teams. From a facilitator's perspective, boundary-crossing issues (organizational, cultural, language and time and distance) can affect relationship building in many important ways. For instance, facilitators found that organizational boundary crossing was affected by differing organizational cultures and policies, while working across cultures required awareness and adjustment in relationship-building expectations and strategies. Crossing time and distance barriers necessitated the skilful use of synchronous and asynchronous ICTs and communication channels. These findings will be explored and the implications for practice and research will also be discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerN. (1986). International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior (Kent Publishing Company, Boston).
2.
BaskervilleR., and Pries-HejeJ. (1999). Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice. Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 9, 1–23.
3.
BoutellierR., GassmanO., MachoH., and RouxM. (1998). Management of dispersed product development teams: the role of information technologies. R & D Management, 28, 13–26.
4.
ColemanD. (1997). Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANS and Intranets (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River).
5.
CramtonC. (2001). Attribution in distributed work groups. In Distributed Work: New Research on Working Across Distance Using Technology, HindsP., and KieslerS. (eds) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
6.
CramtonC., and WebberS. (2000). The Impact of Geographic Dispersion on Work Teams: A Sociotechnical Perspective (George Mason University, Fairfax, VA).
7.
DavenportT., and PearlsonK. (1998). Two cheers for the virtual office. Sloan Management Review, 130(4), 51–66.
8.
DuarteN., and Tennant-SnyderN. (1999). Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco).
9.
FinholtT., and SproullL.S. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organizational Science, 1, 41–61.
10.
GlaserB. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory (The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).
11.
GlaserB., and StraussA.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine De Gruyter, New York).
12.
GoffmanE. (1990). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Penguin, London).
13.
GopalA., and PrasadP. (2000). Understanding GDSS in symbolic context: shifting the focus from technology to interaction. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 509–45.
14.
HallE.T. (1976). Beyond Culture (Doubleday, New York).
15.
JarvenpaaS.L., and LeidnerD.E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organizational Science, 10(6), 791–815.
16.
KayworthT., and LeidnerD. (2000). The global virtual manager: a prescription for success. European Management Journal, 18(2), 183–94.
17.
KettingerW.J., and GroverV. (1997). The use of computer-mediated communication in an interorganizational context. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 513–55.
18.
KimballL. (1997). Managing Virtual Teams, Speech for Team Strategies. Conference sponsored by Federal Press, Toronto, Canada. http://www.tmn.com/∼lisa/vteamstoronto.htm Accessed 26 October 2000.
KrautR.E., FishR.S., RootR.W., and ChalfonteB.L. (1993). Information communication in organizations: form, function, and technology. In Readings in Groupware and Computer-supported Cooperative Work, BaekerR.M. (ed.) (Morgan Kaufamann, San Mateo, CA), pp. 287–314.
22.
LauF. (1999). Toward a framework for action research in iInformation systems studies. IT & People, 12(2), 148–75.
23.
LauF., SarkerS., and SahayS. (2000). On managing virtual teams. Healthcare Information Management Communications Canada, 14, 46–53.
24.
LewisR.D. (1996). When Cultures Collide: Managing Successfully Across Cultures (Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London).
25.
LipnackJ., and StampsJ. (1997). Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizational Boundaries (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
26.
MargerisonC. (1988). Action learning and excellence in management development. Journal of Management Development, 7(5), 43–55.
27.
MarsickV., and O'NeilJ. (1999). The many faces of action learning. Management Learning, 30(2), 159–76.
28.
MaznevskiM.L., and ChudobaK.M. (2000). Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473–92.
29.
MerizowJ. (ed) (1990). Fostering Critical Reflection in Childhood (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
30.
MerizowJ. (ed) (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult LearningJossey-Bass, San Francisco).
31.
NandhakumarJ. (1999). Virtual teams and lost proximity: consequences on trust relationships. In Virtual Working: Social and Organizational Dynamics, JacksonP. (ed.) (Routledge, London) pp. 46–56.
32.
NiedermanF., BeiseCM., and BeranekP.M. (1996). Issues and concerns about computer-supported meetings: the facilitator's perspective. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 177–98.
33.
NonakaI., and TakeuchiH. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company (Oxford University Press, New York).
34.
NunamakerJ.F., DennisA.R., ValacichJ.S., VogelD.R., and GeorgeJ.F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 40–61.
35.
NunamakerJ., BriggsR., MittlemanD., and VogelD. (1996/1997). Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(3), 163–207.
36.
O'Hara-DevereauxM., and JohansenR. (1994). Global Work: Bridging Distance, Culture and TimeJossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco).
37.
OrlikowskiW., YatesJ., OkamuraK., and FujimotoM. (1995). Shaping electronic communication: the meta-structuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science, 6(4), 423–44.
38.
PareG., and DubeL. (1999). Virtual teams: an exploratory study of key challenges and strategies. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Information Systems, Charlotte, NC January, pp. 479–83.
39.
PauleenD., and YoongP. (2001). Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policies, 11(3), 190–202.
40.
PereyC. (1997). Desktop videoconferencing. In Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANS and Intranets, ColemanD. (ed.) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River) pp. 321–34.
41.
PowellW.W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
42.
RevansR. (1982). The Origins and Growth of Action Learning (Chartwell-Bratt, Bromley).
43.
RichardsT., and RichardsL. (1994). Using computers in qualitative research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, LincolnY.S., and DenzinN.K. (eds) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 445–63.
44.
RobeyD., KhooH.M., and PoersC. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. Technical Communication, 47(1), 51–66.
45.
SarkerS., LauF., and SahayS. (2000). Building an inductive theory of collaboration in virtual teams: an adapted grounded theory approach. In 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference in Systems Science, Hawaii January, pp. 1–10.
46.
ScheinE.H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3–16.
47.
SchwartzD.G. (1999). When e-mail meets organizational memories: addressing threats to communication in a learning organization. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 51, 599–614.
48.
StraussA.L., and CorbinJ (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage Publications, Newbury Park).
49.
TownsendA., DeMarieS., and HendricksonA. (1998). Virtual teams: technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 17–29.
50.
TrauthE.M., and JessupL.M. (2000). Understanding computer-mediated discussions: positivist and interpretative analysis of group support system use. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 43–79.
51.
Van der SmagtT. (2000). Enhancing virtual teams: social relations v. communication technology. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(4), 148–56.
52.
WaltherJ.B., and BurgoonJ.K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50–88.
53.
WarkentinM., and BeranekP.M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9, 271–89.
54.
WarkentinM.E., SayeedL., and HightowerR. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: an exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28, 975–96.
55.
WiesenfeldB.M., RaghuramS., and GarudR. (1998). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(4).
56.
YoongP. (1996). Action learning: preparing workers for the international office of the future. In IFIP WG8.4 Conference, Tuscon, Arizona, 19 April, pp. 351–62.
57.
YoongP., and GallupeB. (2001). Action learning and group-ware technologies: a case study in GSS facilitation research. Information Technology and People, 14(1), 78–90.
