Two of the most significant forces shaping organizations are globalization and the continued, rapid and, some would say, radical changes taking place in information technology (IT). To date, the extant literature has centred on the technology acceptance model (TAM) because it is arguably one of the most widely cited and influential models used for explaining the acceptance of IT. However, this literature has remained relatively silent with respect to the role that differences in national culture might play in IT acceptance as globalization continues. In order to begin to address this deficit, this paper offers a series of research propositions that explore the potential impact of differences in national culture on IT implementation and acceptance. Specifically, the paper explores the effects of culturally induced beliefs – including individualism-collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, long-/short-term orientation and power distance – on the implementation processes that impact on key variables in the TAM. The paper then discusses the potential importance of the revisions it has made for both researchers interested in employing the model for predicting IT acceptance in cross-cultural contexts and for managers faced with introducing new IT in a global organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abdul-GadarH. (1997). Information systems strategies in multi-national companies in Arab Gulf Countries. International Journal of Information Management, 17(1), 3–12.
2.
AdamsD.A., NelsonR.R., and ToddP.A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–47.
3.
AdlerN.J. (1991). International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, 2nd edn (PWS-Kent Publishing Co., Boston, MA).
4.
AgarwalR., and PrasadJ. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–91.
5.
BabaM.L., FalkenburgD.R., and HillD.H. (1996). Technology management and American culture: implications for business process redesign. Research Technology Management, 39(6), 44–54.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control (W.H. Freeman and Company, New York).
7.
BergerP.L., and LuckmannT. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality (Doubleday, New York).
8.
Business Week (1998). Will technology leave Japan behind?Business Week51 31 August, 124–6.
9.
ChauP.Y.K. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185–204.
10.
ChinW., and GopalA. (1995). Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs. DATABASE, 26(2/3), 42–63.
11.
DanowitzA.K., NassefY., and GoodmanS.E. (1995). Cyberspace across the Sahara: computing in North Africa. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 23–8.
12.
DavisF. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT.
13.
DavisF. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–40.
14.
DeutschM. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
15.
EnglandG.W. (1975). The Manager and His Values (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA).
16.
Entsua-MensahC. (1996). Towards effective information management: a view from Ghana. International Journal of Information Management, 16(2), 149–56.
17.
FishbeinM., and AzjenI. (1975). Belief Attitude, Intention and Behavior (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
18.
FloydS.W. (1988). Managerial work, user background, and the use of information technology. In Managing Technological Development: Strategic and Human Resource Issues, LarwoodL., and GattikerU. (eds) (Walter DeGruyter, Berlin and New York), pp. 123–42.
19.
FloydS.W., and WooldridgeB. (1990). Path analysis of the relationships between competitive strategy, information technology, and financial performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(1), 47–64.
20.
GefenD., and StraubD.W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389–400.
21.
HageJ., and AikenM. (1970). Social Change in Complex Organizations (Random House, New York).
22.
HasanH., and DitsaG. (1999). The impact of culture on the adoption of IT: an interpretive study. Journal of Global Information Management, 7(1), 5–15.
23.
HillC.E., LochK.D., StraubD.W., and El-SheshaiK. (1998). A qualitative assessment of Arab culture and information technology transfer. Journal of Global Information Management, 6(3), 29–38.
24.
HofstedeG. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organizations: do American theories apply abroad?Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42–63.
25.
HofstedeG. (1991). Cultures and Organizations (McGraw-Hill, London).
26.
HofstedeG. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 81–94.
27.
HofstedeG., and BondM. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(1), 4–21.
28.
ImahoriT.T., and CupachW.R. (1994). A cross-cultural comparison of the interpretation and management of face: American and Japanese responses to embarrassing predicaments. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18, 193–219.
29.
IshidaM. (1998). Information and communications technology and jobs: creator or destroyer? In The World Bank Virtual Symposium on Information and Communications Technology, Jobs and Work: Challenge for Development, 18 May-3 July, New Delhi, 37–49.
30.
JackofskyE.F., and SlocumJ.W. (1988). CEO roles across cultures. In The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers, HambrickD.C. (ed.) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 67–99.
31.
JohnstonH.R., and CarricoS.R. (1988). Developing capabilities to use information strategically. MIS Quarterly, 15 March, 37–48.
32.
KediaB.L., and BhagatR.S. (1988). Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: implications for research in international and comparative management. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 559–71.
33.
KroeberA.L., and KluckhohnF. (1952). Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
34.
LodgeG.C., and VogelE.F. (eds) (1987). Ideology and National Competitiveness (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).
35.
LucasH.C.Jr., and SpitlerV.K. (1999). Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 291–311.
36.
LytleA.L., BrettJ.M., BarsnessZ.I., TinsleyC.H., and JanssensM. (1995). A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 167–214.
37.
McMillanC.J. (1996). The Japanese Industrial System, 3rd edn (Walter de Gruyter, New York).
38.
MathiesonK. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–91.
39.
MillerC.C., and CardinalL.B. (1994). Strategic planning and firm performance: a synthesis of more than two decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1649–65.
40.
NickersonR.S. (1981). Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15, 469–83.
41.
O'Hara-DevereauxM., and JohansenR. (1994). Global Work: Bridging Distance, Culture and Time (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
42.
PrussiaG.E., and KinickiA.J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(2), 187–198.
43.
RenL. (1998). Information and communications technology and enterprise: the new business environment. In The World Bank Virtual Symposium on Information and Communications Technology, Jobs and Work: Challenge for Development, 18 May-3 July.
44.
RockartJ.F., and Scott MortonM.S. (1984). Implications of changes in information technology for corporate strategy. Interfaces, 14, 84–95.
45.
RogersE.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd Ed. (The Free Press, New York).
46.
RoseG., and StraubD.W. (1998). Predicting general IT use: applying TAM to the Arabic world. Journal of Global Information Management, 6(3), 39–46.
47.
SagaV., and ZmudR. (1994). The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. IFIP Transactions A (Computer Science and Technology), A-45, 67–86.
48.
ShaneS.A. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 59–73.
49.
ShortJ., WilliamsE., and ChristieB. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (Wiley, London).
50.
StraubD.W. (1994). The effect of culture on IT diffusion: E-mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S. Information Systems Research, 5(1), 23–47.
51.
StraubD.W., KeilM., and BrennerW.H. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study. Information and Management, 33(1), 1–11.
52.
Szajna-BernadetteP.S. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85–92.
53.
TanB., WatsonR., and WeiK. (1995). National culture and group support systems: filtering communication to dampen power differentials. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 82–92.
54.
ThompsonR., HigginsC., and HowellJ. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–43.
55.
TriandisH.C. (1994). Cross-Cultural, Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In TriandisH.C., DunetteM.D., and HoughC.M. (eds) Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology. (Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, DA), 103–172.
56.
Van MaanenJ., and LaurentA. (1993). The flow of culture: some notes on globalization and the multinational corporation. In Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, GhoshalS., and WestneyD.E. (eds) (St Martin's Press, New York), pp. 275–312.
57.
VeigaJ.F. (1991). The frequency of self-limiting behavior in groups: a measure and an explanation. Human Relations, 44(8), 877–95.
58.
VeigaJ.F., YanouzasJ., and BuchholtzA. (1993). Business practices: an exercise comparing Russian managers. In Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial International Management Conference of the Eastern Academy of Management, Berlin, Germany June 14–19, 1993, pp. 56–60.
59.
VeigaJ.F., YanouzasJ., and BuchholtzA. (1995). Emerging cultural values among Russian managers: what will tomorrow bring?Business Horizons, 38(4), 20–7.
60.
VenkateshV., and DavisF.D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–81.
61.
VroomV. (1964). Work and Motivation (Wiley, New York).
62.
WeickK.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).
