Several applications of information and communication technology (ICT) have gained considerable popularity as instruments for knowledge management. Some authors even seem to equate knowledge management with the introduction of specific ICT applications (intranets, groupware, etc.). However, the relationship between ICT and knowledge is no less problematic. Organizational knowledge and ICT refer to distinct sets of conceptions and establishing their relationship is far from trivial. The question then is how to assess the relationship between ICT and knowledge management. Several variables to be considered when answering this question have been identified in the literature: the enabling role of ICT for knowledge processes, the state of the ICT infrastructure, the level of knowledge required for using ICT, other user considerations, etc. However, a more encompassing perspective connecting these individual variables seems to be lacking. The aim of the present paper is to correct this. It argues that five dimensions determine the potential value of ICT applications for knowledge management. These dimensions are summarized in the following question. How and when will ICT, in interplay with other knowledge management measures (dimension 5), help knowledge (dimension 2) as a dynamic (dimension 4), institutional and action-related resource (dimension 3) realize its strategic potential (dimension 1)? The main argument in this paper is that, unless all five dimensions are addressed together, no satisfactory assessment of the status of an ICT application as a potential tool for knowledge management is feasible. Each of these dimensions is of a complex, multidimensional nature. The identification of the five dimensions is therefore only a first step. It needs a follow-up in the form of an elaboration of each dimension. This paper provides the groundwork for such an elaboration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbeckerA., BernardiA., HinkelmannK., KühnO., and SintekM (1997). Towards a well-founded technology for organizational memories. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management, Stanford University, Palo Alto, March 24–26, 1997 pp. 1–7.
2.
AckoffR.L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Presidential address to ISGSR, June 1988. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3–9.
3.
AndersonJ. (1976). Language, Memory, and Thought (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
4.
ArgyrisC., and SchönD.A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison-Wesley, Reading).
5.
BairJ.H., and O'ConnorE. (1998). The state of the product in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 20–7.
6.
BalasubramanianP., NochurK., HendersonJ.C., and KwanM.M. (1999). Managing process knowledge for decision support. Decision Support Systems, 27(1/2), 145–62.
7.
BalasubramanianV. (1995). Organizational Learning and Information Systems (Rutgers University, Graduate School of Management, Newark).
8.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind (Ballantine, New York).
9.
BellD. (1999). The Coming of the Post-industrial Age (Basic Books, New York).
10.
BertramsJ. (1999). De Kennisdelende Organisatie. Kunst en Praktijk van het Hergebruik van Kennis (Scriptum, Schiedam).
11.
BlacklerF. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–46.
12.
BoisotM., and GriffithsD. (1999). Possession is nine tenths of the law. Managing a firm's knowledge base in a regime of weak appropriability. International Journal of Technology Management, 17(6), 662–76.
13.
BontisN., DragonettiN.C., JacobsenK., and RoosG. (1999). The knowledge toolbox: a review of tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal, 17(4), 391–402.
14.
BotkinJ. (1999). Smart Business: How Knowledge Communities can Revolutionize Your Company (Free Press, New York).
15.
ClanceyW.J. (1997). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
CollinsH., and KuschM. (1998). The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do (MIT Press, Cambridge).
18.
CowanR., and ForayD. (1997). The economics of codification and the diffusion of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(3), 595–622.
19.
CurrieW., and GalliersB. (eds) (1999). Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
20.
DavenportT.H., and PrusakL. (1998). Working Knowledge. How Organizations Manage what They Know (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
21.
DiengR., CorbyO., GiboinA., and RibièreA. (1999). Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(3), 567–98.
22.
DoughertyD. (2000). Structuring Practice-based Knowledge in Service Organizations (Nijmegen Lectures on Innovation Management no. 6, Maklu, Antwerpen).
23.
DruckerP. (1993). Post-capitalist Society (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford).
24.
EdvinssonL., and MaloneM.S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding its Hidden Roots (HarperBusiness, New York).
25.
FisherK., and FisherM.D. (1998). The Distributed Mind: Achieving High Performance Through the Collective Intelligence of Knowledge Work Teams (AMACOM, American Management Association, New York).
26.
GarvinD.A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71, 78–91.
27.
GillT.G. (1995). High-tech hidebound: case studies of information technologies that inhibited organizational learning. Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 5(1), 41–60.
28.
GutwinC, PaynterG., WittenI., Nevill-ManningC., and FrankE. (1999). Improving browsing in digital libraries with keyphrase indexes. Decision Support Systems, 27(1/2), 81–104.
29.
HansenM.T., NohriaN., and TierneyT. (1999). What's the strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–16.
30.
HedlundG. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 73–90.
31.
HendriksP.H.J. (1999a). Do smarter systems make for smarter organizations?Decision Support Systems, 27(1/2), 199–213.
32.
HendriksP.H.J. (1999b). The organizational impact of knowledge-based systems: a knowledge perspective. Knowledge-based Systems, 12(4), 159–69.
33.
HendriksP.H.J. (1999c). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91–100.
34.
HendriksP.H.J. (2000a). An organizational learning perspective on GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(4), 373–96.
35.
HendriksP.H.J. (2000b). Managing innovation as knowledge work. In Management of Innovation in the Knowledge Economy – European Perspectives, Nijmegen Business School, 5–6 June.
36.
HendriksP.H.J., and VriensD.J. (1999). Knowledge-based systems and knowledge management: friends or foes?Information and Management, 35(2), 113–25.
37.
HislopD., NewellD., ScarbroughH., and SwanJ. (2000). Innovation processes and the management of knowledge. In Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, University of Warwick, 10–11 February 2000.
38.
HuberG.P. (1991). Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.
39.
JunnarkarB., and BrownC.V. (1997). Re-assessing the enabling role of information technology in KM. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), 142–8.
40.
LamA. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), 487–514.
41.
LaudonK.C., and LaudonJ.P. (1997). Management Information Systems, 2nd edn (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River).
42.
LeonardD., and SensiperS. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112–32.
43.
LeonardD. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
44.
LiebowitzJ., and BeckmanT. (1998). Knowledge Organizations. What Every Manager Should Know (St Lucie Press, Boca Raton).
45.
LindgrenR., and WallstromC. (2000). A close look at knowledge management systems. In Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, University of Warwick, 10–11 February 2000.
46.
McDermottR. (1999). Knowledge management – why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103–17.
47.
McQuaidM.J., OngT.-H., ChenH., and NunamakerJ.J. (1999). Multidimensional scaling for group memory visualization. Decision Support Systems, 27(1/2), 163–76.
48.
MalhotraY. (2000a). Knowledge management and new organization forms: a framework for business model innovation. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(1), 5–17.
MarshallL. (1997). Facilitating knowledge management and knowledge sharing; new opportunities for information professionals. Online, 21(5), 92–8.
51.
MarshallN., and SapsedJ. (2000). The limits of disembodied knowledge: challenges of inter-project learning in the production of complex products and systems. In Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, University of Warwick, 10–11 February 2000.
52.
MeltsnerK.J. (1997). Opportunities for AI applications in knowledge management. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management, Stanford University, Palo Alto March 24–26, 1997 p. 114.
53.
MiltonN., ShadboltN., CottamH., and HammersleyM. (1999). Towards a knowledge technology for knowledge management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(3), 615–42.
54.
MuellerF., and DyersonR. (1999). Expert humans or expert organizations?Organization Studies, 20(2), 225–92.
55.
NissenM.E. (1999). Knowledge-based knowledge management in the reengineering domain. Decision Support Systems, 27(1/2), 47–65.
56.
NonakaI. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.
57.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
58.
NonakaI., and TakeuchiH. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York).
59.
O'BrienJ.A. (1998). Introduction to Information Systems: An Internetworked Perspective, 2nd alternate edn (McGraw-Hill, Chicago).
60.
O'DellC., and GraysonC.J. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know: The Transfer of Internal Knowledge and Best Practice (Free Press, New York).
61.
PanS.L., and ScarbroughH. (1999). Knowledge management in practice: an exploratory case study. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(3), 359–74.
62.
PolanyiM. (1958). Personal Knowledge (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
63.
PolanyiM. (1966). The Tacit Dimension (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).
64.
QuinnJ.B. (1992). Intelligent Enterprise; A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry (Free Press, New York).
65.
ReichR. (1992). The Work of Nations (Vintage Press, New York).
66.
RochesterJ.B. (1996). Using Computers and Information: Tools for Knowledge Workers (Que Education & Training, Indianapolis, IN).
67.
RoussinovD.G., and ChenH. (1999). Document clustering for electronic meetings: an experimental comparison of two techniques. Decision Support Systems, 27(1/2), 67–79.
RugglesR. (1997b). Knowledge Tools; Using Technology to Manage Knowledge Better (Ernst & Young, Boston).
70.
ScarbroughH. (1999). Knowledge as work: conflicts in the management of knowledge workers. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(1), 5–16.
71.
SengeP.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline (Doubleday/Currency, New York).
72.
SkyrmeD.J. (1998). Knowledge management solutions – the IT contribution. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 19(1), 34–9.
73.
SpenderJ.-C. (1996). Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(1), 63–78.
74.
StarbuckW.H. (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713–40.
75.
SteinE.W. (1995). Organizational memory: review of concepts and recommendations for management. International Journal of Information Management, 15(1), 17–32.
76.
SteinE.W., and ZwassV. (1995). Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 85–117.
77.
SuchmanL. (1993). Response to Vera and Simon's situated action: a symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17(1), 71–6.
78.
SwanJ., ScarbroughH., and PrestonJ. (1999). Knowledge management – the next fad to forget people? In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS ‘99: Copenhagen, June 23–25, 1999).
79.
SwanJ., NewellS., and RobertsonM. (2000). Limits of IT-driven knowledge management for interactive innovation processes: towards a community-based approach. In 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICCS 33: Maui, Hawaii, January 4–7, 2000).
80.
TeeceD.J. (1998). Research directions for knowledge management;California Management Review, 40(3), pp.289–292.
81.
TissenR., AndriessenD., and Lekanne DeprezF. (1998). Value-based Knowledge Management: Creating the 21st Century Company: Knowledge Intensive, People Rich (Addison Wesley Longman, Amsterdam).
82.
TsechanskyM.S., PliskinN., RabinowitzG., and PorathA. (1999). Mining relational patterns from multiple relational tables. Decision Support Systems, 27(1/2), 177–95.
83.
TsoukasH. (1994). Refining common sense: types of knowledge in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 31(6), 761–80.
84.
TsoukasH. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–26.
85.
TsoukasH., and VladimirouE. (2000). On organizational knowledge and its management: an ethnographic investigation. Paper presented at the conference ‘Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies’; University of Warwick, February 10–11, 2000.
86.
Van HeijstG., HofmanM., KruizingaE., and Van der SpekR. (1997). AI-techniques and the knowledge pump. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management, Stanford University, Palo Alto March 24–26, 1997 pp. 168–71.
87.
VerwijsC., DijkstraJ., HeerenE., and De WitD. (1999). Kennismaken met Kennismanagement (Telematica Instituut, Enschede).
88.
WalshJ.P., and UngsonG.R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91.
89.
WareJ., and DegoeyP. (1998). Knowledge Work and Information Technology (Fisher Center for Management and Information Technology, Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA).
90.
WeggemanM. (1996). Knowledge management: the modus operandi for a learning organization. In Knowledge Management Organization, Competence and Methodology. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, SchreinemakersJ.F. (ed.) (Ergon, Wurzburg), pp. 175–87.
91.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
92.
WhitleyE.A. (2000). Tacit and explicit knowledge; conceptual confusion around the commodification of knowledge. In Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, University of Warwick, 10–11 February 2000.
93.
WielingaB., SandbergJ., and SchreiberG. (1997). Methods and techniques for knowledge management: what has knowledge engineering to offer?Expert Systems With Applications, 13(1), 73–84.
94.
WiigK.M., De HoogR., and Van der SpekR. (1997). Supporting knowledge management: a selection of methods and techniques. Expert Systems With Applications, 13(1), 15–27.
95.
WijnhovenA.B.J.M. (1995). Organizational learning and information systems: the case of monitoring information and control systems in machine bureaucratic organizations. PhD thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
96.
ZackM.H. (1998). What knowledge-problems can information technology help to solve? In Association for Information Systems 1998 Americas Conference, Baltimore, MD August 14–16, 1998.
97.
ZackM.H. (1999a). IT-strategy – managing codified knowledge – a framework for aligning organizational and technical resources and capabilities to leverage explicit knowledge and expertise. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45–57.
98.
ZackM.H. (1999b). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125–45.
