The purpose of the present article is to dispense an extensive review of research works performed to observe the impacts of nanoparticles tribologically and rationalise the use of nanoparticles in metal rolling lubrication. The results of past experimental research were analysed based on tribological behaviour, lubricant characteristics, and rolling quality. Improvements in tribological behaviour, rolled surface characteristics and mechanical strength were illustrated in the present work. A specific concentration of nanoparticles in the base lubricant was discovered which provided beneficial outcomes. The oxide scale formed as an inevitable byproduct is suppressed by the nano-application. The nanoparticles served better in the rolling process in terms of temperature control due to the enhanced thermal conductivity of the base lubricant. The article advocates for the adoption of nano-lubrication in replacement of traditional lubricating fluids in the rolling process. The article lastly presents future challenges and the potential of nanolubricants in engineering applications.
WangL, TieuAK, ZhuH, . A study of water-based lubricant with a mixture of polyphosphate and nano-TiO2 as additives for hot rolling process. Wear. 2021;477:203895. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2021.203895
2.
YounasM, JafferySHI, KhanA, . Development and analysis of tool wear and energy consumption maps for turning of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). J Manuf Process. 2021;62:613–622. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.060
3.
SpuzicS, StraffordK, SubramanianC, . Wear of Hot rolling mill rolls: an overview. Wear. 1994;176(2):261–271. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(94)90155-4
4.
IkumapayiO, AkinlabiE, OnuP, . Rolling operation in metal forming: process and principles – a brief study. Mater Today Proc. 2020;26:1644–1649. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.343
5.
SerebriakovI, Puchi-CabreraES, DubarL, . Friction analysis during deformation of steels under Hot-working conditions. Tribol Int. 2021;158:106928. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2021.106928
6.
PellizzariM, CescatoD, De FloraM.Hot friction and wear behaviour of high speed steel and high chromium iron for rolls. Wear. 2009;267(1):467–475. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2009.01.049
7.
YaroslavtcevA, AndrosenkoM, KulikovaE.Performance improvement in rolling of hot-rolled wide strip by supplying lubricant to the backup rolls of a finishing. Mater Today Proc. 2019;19:2462–2466. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.104
8.
LenardJ, ZhangS.A study of friction during the lubricated cold rolling of an aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 1997;72(2):293–301. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00183-0
9.
WuH, XiongS, LinW, . Study on tribological behavior, lubrication and anti-corrosion properties of W/O microemulsion for cold rolling of copper strip. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2021;73(4):554–562. doi:10.1108/ILT-06-2020-0227
10.
KalitaP, MalsheAP, Arun KumarS, . Study of specific energy and friction coefficient in minimum quantity lubrication grinding using Oil-based nanolubricants. J Manuf Process. 2012;14(2):160–166. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.01.001
11.
HuX, WangY, JingH.Application of oil-in-water emulsion in hot rolling process of brass sheet. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2010;62(4):224–231. doi:10.1108/00368791011051080
12.
YıldırımÇV, ŞirinŞ, KıvakT, . A comparative study on the tribological behavior of mono&proportional hybrid nanofluids for sustainable turning of AISI 420 hardened steel with cermet tools. J Manuf Process. 2022;73:695–714. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.11.044
13.
AliMKA, XianjunH, MaiL, . Improving the tribological characteristics of piston ring assembly in automotive engines using Al2O3 and TiO2 nanomaterials as nano-lubricant additives. Tribol Int. 2016;103:540–554. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2016.08.011
14.
LvT, HuangS, LiuE, . Tribological and machining characteristics of an electrostatic minimum quantity lubrication (EMQL) technology using graphene nano-lubricants as cutting fluids. J Manuf Process. 2018;34:225–237. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.06.016
15.
HolmbergK, AnderssonP, ErdemirA.Global energy consumption due to friction in passenger cars. Tribol Int. 2012;47:221–234. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2011.11.022
16.
FoxIE.Numerical evaluation of the potential for fuel economy improvement due to boundary friction reduction within heavy-duty diesel engines. Tribol Int. 2005;38(3):265–275. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2004.08.010
17.
AliyuIK, SamadMA, Al-QutubA.Tribological characterization of a bearing coated with UHMWPE/GNPs nanocomposite coating. Surf Eng. 2021;37(1):60–69. doi:10.1080/02670844.2020.1754624
18.
CuiS, ZhuH, WanS, . Investigation of different inorganic chemical compounds as hot metal forming lubricant by Pin-on-disc and Hot rolling. Tribol Int. 2018;125:110–120. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2018.04.010
ElsaidK, OlabiA, WilberforceT, . Environmental impacts of nanofluids: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2021;763:144202. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144202
21.
JasonYJJ, HowHG, TeohYH, . A study on the tribological performance of nanolubricants. Processes. 2020;8(11):1372. doi:10.3390/pr8111372
22.
Esquivel-GaonM, NguyenNHA, SgroiMF, . In vitroand environmental toxicity of reduced graphene oxide as an additive in automotive lubricants. Nanoscale. 2018;10(14):6539–6548. doi:10.1039/C7NR08597D.
23.
MahianO, BellosE, MarkidesCN, . Recent advances in using nanofluids in renewable energy systems and the environmental implications of their uptake. Nano Energy. 2021;86:106069. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106069
24.
CilsalOO, CakirMC, UguzA.Innovative low-cost, cold-walled CVD process development and CNT production by ethanol decomposition on iron-nanoparticles. Surf Eng. 2022;38(5):472–481. doi:10.1080/02670844.2022.2113755
25.
SaidZ, SundarLS, TiwariAK, . Recent advances on the fundamental physical phenomena behind stability, dynamic motion, thermophysical properties, heat transport, applications, and challenges of nanofluids. Phys Rep. 2022;946:1–94. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.07.002.
26.
XiaW, ZhaoJ, WuH, . Effects of Oil-in-water based nanolubricant containing TiO2 nanoparticles on the tribological behaviour of oxidised high-speed steel. Tribol Int. 2017;110:77–85. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2017.02.013
27.
BergerO.Understanding the fundamentals of TiO2surfaces. Part I. The influence of defect states on the correlation between crystallographic structure, electronic structure and physical properties of single-crystal surfaces. Surf Eng. 2022;38(2):91–149. doi:10.1080/02670844.2022.2063482
28.
LiC, LiX, HuangS, . Ultra-Precision grinding of Gd3Ga5O12 crystals with graphene oxide coolant: material deformation mechanism and performance evaluation. J Manuf Process. 2021;61:417–427. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.11.037
29.
ShuangY, JohnM, SonglinD.Experimental investigation on the performance and mechanism of graphene oxide nanofluids in turning Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process. 2019;43:164–174. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.005
30.
TomalaA, KarpinskaA, WernerWSM, . Tribological properties of additives for water-based lubricants. Wear. 2010;269(11–12):804–810. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2010.08.008
31.
PalA, ChathaSS, SidhuHS.Performance evaluation of the minimum quantity lubrication with Al2O3 mixed vegetable-oil-based cutting fluid in drilling of AISI 321 stainless steel. J Manuf Process. 2021;66:238–249. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.024
32.
Bin AbdollahMF, AmiruddinH, Alif AzmiM, . Lubrication mechanisms of hexagonal boron nitride nano-additives water-based lubricant for steel–steel contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol. 2021;235(5):1038–1046. doi:10.1177/1350650120940173
33.
ThinagarA, AnishW, SunilJ.Synthesis and characterization of ZnS nanoparticles for nanofluid applications. Mater Today Proc. 2020;21:793–795. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.244
34.
HeT, ChenN, FangJ, . Micro/nano carbon spheres as liquid lubricant additive: achievements and prospects. J Mol Liq. 2022;357:119090. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119090
35.
RoushanA, RaoUS, PatraK, . Performance evaluation of tool coatings and nanofluid MQL on the micro-machinability of Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process. 2022;73:595–610. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.11.030
36.
TonkR.The challenges and benefits of using carbon nano-tubes as friction modifier lubricant additives. Mater Today Proc. 2021;37:3275–3278. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.112
37.
ManojKumarK, GhoshA.Synthesis of MWCNT nanofluid and evaluation of its potential besides soluble oil as micro cooling-lubrication medium in SQL grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2015;77(9):1955–1964. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6587-8.
38.
LuoY, YaoW, FuW, . Preparing superhydrophobic nanocomposite coating with SiO2nanoparticles on magnesium alloy. Surf Eng. 2020;37(10):1231–1238. doi: 10.1080/02670844.2020.1840803.
39.
KumarAS, DebS, PaulS.Tribological characteristics and micromilling performance of nanoparticle enhanced water based cutting fluids in minimum quantity lubrication. J Manuf Process. 2020;56:766–776. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.032
40.
RatoiM, NisteVB, WalkerJ, . Mechanism of action of WS2 lubricant nanoadditives in high-pressure contacts. Tribol Lett. 2013;52(1):81–91. doi:10.1007/s11249-013-0195-x
41.
WangB, QiuF, BarberGC, . Role of nano-sized materials as lubricant additives in friction and wear reduction: a review. Wear. 2022;490-491:204206. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2021.204206
42.
LuoT, WeiX, ZhaoH, . Tribology properties of Al2O3/TiO2 nanocomposites as lubricant additives. Ceram Int. 2014;40(7):10103–10109. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.181
43.
LiZ, HouX, YuL, . Preparation of lanthanum trifluoride nanoparticles surface-capped by tributyl phosphate and evaluation of their tribological properties as lubricant additive in liquid paraffin. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;292:971–977. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.089
44.
KrishnamurthyA, Abdul RazakK, HalemaniBS, . Performance enhancement in tribological properties of lubricants by dispersing TiO2 nanoparticles. Mater Today Proc. 2021;47:6180–6184. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.083
45.
AliZAAA, TakhakhAM, Al-WailyM.A review of use of nanoparticle additives in lubricants to improve its tribological properties. Mater Today Proc. 2022;52:1442–1450. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.193
46.
HuKH, CaiYK, HuXG, . Synthesis and tribological properties of MoS2composite nanoparticles with different morphologies. Surf Eng. 2011;27(7):544–550. doi:10.1179/1743294410Y.0000000018
47.
WangL, GongP, LiW, . Mono-Dispersed Ag/graphene nanocomposite as lubricant additive to reduce friction and wear. Tribol Int. 2020;146:106228. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106228
48.
LiuX, XuN, LiW, . Exploring the effect of nanoparticle size on the tribological properties of SiO2 / polyalkylene glycol nanofluid under different lubrication conditions. Tribol Int. 2017;109:467–472. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2017.01.007
49.
HeJ, SunJ, MengY, . Improved lubrication performance of MoS2-Al2O3 nanofluid through interfacial tribochemistry. Colloids Surf, A. 2021;618:126428. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126428
50.
GuoYB, WangDG, LiuSH, . Synthesis and tribological properties of CuS/ZnS nanoparticles doped polyelectrolyte multilayers. Surf Eng. 2013;29(1):17–22. doi:10.1179/1743294412Y.0000000074.
51.
HuangS, HeA, YunJ-H, . Synergistic tribological performance of a water based lubricant using graphene oxide and alumina hybrid nanoparticles as additives. Tribol Int. 2019;135:170–180. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2019.02.031
52.
ZhangC, ZhangS, YuL, . Preparation and tribological properties of water-soluble copper/silica nanocomposite as a water-based lubricant additive. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;259:824–830. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.132
53.
XieH, WeiY, JiangB, . Tribological properties of carbon nanotube/SiO2 combinations as water-based lubricant additives for magnesium alloy. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;12:138–149. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.079
54.
ElagouzA, AliMKA, XianjunH, . Frictional performance evaluation of sliding surfaces lubricated by zinc-oxide nano-additives. Surf Eng. 2020;36(2):144–157. doi:10.1080/02670844.2019.1620442
55.
WuH, ZhaoJ, XiaW, . A study of the tribological behaviour of TiO2 nano-additive water-based lubricants. Tribol Int. 2017;109:398–408. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2017.01.013
56.
WuH, ZhaoJ, XiaW, . Analysis of TiO2 nano-additive water-based lubricants in hot rolling of microalloyed steel. J Manuf Process. 2017;27:26–36. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.03.011
57.
BaoY, SunJ, KongL.Effects of nano-SiO2 as water-based lubricant additive on surface qualities of strips after hot rolling. Tribol Int. 2017;114:257–263. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2017.04.026
58.
XiaW, ZhaoJ, WuH, . Effects of oil-in-water based nanolubricant containing TiO2 nanoparticles in hot rolling of 304 stainless steel. Procedia Eng. 2017;207:1385–1390. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.901
59.
HeJ, SunJ, MengY, . Superior lubrication performance of MoS2-Al2O3 composite nanofluid in strips hot rolling. J Manuf Process. 2020;57:312–323. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.037
60.
WangW, GongP, HouT, . Tribological performances of BP/TiO2 nanocomposites as water-based lubrication additives for titanium alloy plate cold rolling. Wear. 2022;494-495:204278. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204278.
61.
SunJ, MengY, ZhangB.Tribological behaviors and lubrication mechanism of water-based MoO3 nanofluid during cold rolling process. J Manuf Process. 2021;61:518–526. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.11.044
62.
XieH, DangS, JiangB, . Tribological performances of SiO2/graphene combinations as water-based lubricant additives for magnesium alloy rolling. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;475:847–856. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.062
DuS, SunJ, WuP, Preparation, characterization and lubrication performances of graphene oxide-TiO2 nanofluid in rolling strips. Carbon N Y. 2018;140:338–351. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.055
65.
WangC, SunJ, GeC, . Synthesis, characterization and lubrication performance of reduced graphene oxide-Al2O3 nanofluid for strips cold rolling. Colloids Surf, A. 2022;637:128204. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.128204
66.
MaL, ZhaoJ, ZhangM, . Study on the tribological behaviour of nanolubricants during micro rolling of copper foils. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(7):2600. doi:10.3390/ma15072600
67.
WuH, JiaF, LiZ, . Novel water-based nanolubricant with superior tribological performance in hot steel rolling. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2020;2(2):025002. doi:10.1088/2631-7990/ab82fe
68.
SunJL, ZhuZX, XuPF.Study on the lubricating performance of nano-TiO2 in water-based cold rolling fluid. Mater Sci Forum. 2015;817:219–224. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.817.219
69.
YananM, JianlinS, JiaqiH, . Recycling prospect and sustainable lubrication mechanism of water-based MoS2 nano-lubricant for steel cold rolling process. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;277:123991. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123991
70.
XiaW, ZhaoJ, ChengX, . Study on growth behaviour of oxide scale and its effects on tribological property of nano-TiO2 additive oil-in-water lubricant. Wear. 2017;376-377:792–802. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.069
71.
HuoM, WuH, XieH, . Understanding the role of water-based nanolubricants in micro flexible rolling of aluminium. Tribol Int. 2020;151:106378. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106378
72.
ZhuZ, SunJ, NiuT, . Experimental research on tribological performance of water-based rolling liquid containing nano-TiO2. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part N J Nanoeng Nanosyst. 2014;229(3):104–109. doi: 10.1177/1740349914522455.
73.
XiongS, LiangD, WuH, . Preparation, characterization, tribological and lubrication performances of Eu doped CaWO4 nanoparticle as anti-wear additive in water-soluble fluid for steel strip during hot rolling. Appl Surf Sci. 2021;539:148090. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148090.
74.
MengY, SunJ, WuP, . The role of nano-TiO2 lubricating fluid on the hot rolled surface and metallographic structure of SS41 steel. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(2):111. doi:10.3390/nano8020111
75.
AzushimaA, XueW, YoshidaY.Lubrication mechanism in hot rolling by newly developed simulation testing machine. CIRP Ann. 2007;56(1):297–300. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.069
76.
LiL, XieH, LiuT, . Influence mechanism of rolling force on strip shape during tandem hot rolling using a novel 3D multi-stand coupled thermo-mechanical FE model. J Manuf Process. 2022;81:505–521. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.025
77.
SinghG, SinghPK.Effect of process parameters on roll separating force, driving torque and end crop length during grooved hot rolling of SAE 1020 steel. J Manuf Process. 2022;79:1003–1016. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.05.015.
78.
JiangZ, XiongS, TieuA, . Modelling of the effect of friction on cold strip rolling. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;201(1):85–90. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.128
79.
ShirizlyA, LenardJG.The effect of lubrication on mill loads during hot rolling of low carbon steel strips. J Mater Process Technol. 2000;97(1):61–68. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00339-8
LiuY, TieuA, WangD, . Friction measurement in cold rolling. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;111(1):142–145. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00541-6
82.
ColásR, Ramı́rezJ, SandovalI, . Damage in hot rolling work rolls. Wear. 1999;230(1):56–60. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00081-2
83.
LenardJG.Tribology in metal rolling keynote presentation forming group F. CIRP Ann. 2000;49(2):567–590. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63456-8
84.
MoslehM, GhaderiM, ShirvaniKA, . Performance of cutting nanofluids in tribological testing and conventional drilling. J Manuf Process. 2017;25:70–76. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.001
85.
PengD, ChenC, KangY, . Size effects of SiO2 nanoparticles as oil additives on tribology of lubricant. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2010;62(2):111–120. doi:10.1108/00368791011025656
86.
WuY, TsuiW, LiuT.Experimental analysis of tribological properties of lubricating oils with nanoparticle additives. Wear. 2007;262(7):819–825. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2006.08.021
87.
MekichaM, De RooijM, JacobsL, . Understanding the generation of wear particles in cold rolling processes. Tribol Int. 2021;155:106789. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106789
88.
LinJ, HuangT, HsuC.Evaluation of lubricants for cold strip rolling. Wear. 1991;147(1):79–91. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(91)90120-J
89.
BartzW.Tribology, tribology, lubricants and lubrication engineering – a review. Wear. 1978;49(1):1–18. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(78)90019-4
90.
ShahnazarS, BagheriS, Abd HamidSB.Enhancing lubricant properties by nanoparticle additives. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(4):3153–3170. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.040
91.
ChenY, YangK, LinH, . Important contributions of multidimensional nanoadditives on the tribofilms: from formation mechanism to tribological behaviors. Compos Part B Eng. 2022;234:109732. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109732
92.
CaoL, LiX, WangQ, . Vibration analysis and numerical simulation of rolling interface during cold rolling with unsteady lubrication. Tribol Int. 2021;153:106604. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106604
93.
DuF, WangG, ZangX, . Friction model for strip rolling. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2010;17:19–23. doi:10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60150-1
94.
PellizzariM, MolinariA, StraffeliniG.Tribological behaviour of hot rolling rolls. Wear. 2005;259(7):1281–1289. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2004.12.006
95.
KijimaH.An experimental investigation on the influence of lubrication on roughness transfer in skin-pass rolling of steel strip. J Mater Process Technol. 2015;225:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.023
96.
JiangZ, TangJ, SunW, . Analysis of tribological feature of the oxide scale in hot strip rolling. Tribol Int. 2010;43:1339–1345. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2009.12.070
97.
YanX, SunJ, XiongS.Effects of lubricants on the rolling performances of cold rolled copper strips. Procedia Eng. 2017;207:2227–2232. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.986
98.
HeA, HuangS, YunJ-H, . Tribological performance and lubrication mechanism of alumina nanoparticle water-based suspensions in ball-on-three-plate testing. Tribol Lett. 2017;65(2). doi: 10.1007/s11249-017-0823-y.
LiuG, LiX, QinB, . Investigation of the mending effect and mechanism of copper nano-particles on a tribologically stressed surface. Tribol Lett. 2004;17(4):961–966. doi:10.1007/s11249-004-8109-6
101.
XieH, JiangZ, YuenW.Analysis of friction and surface roughness effects on edge crack evolution of thin strip during cold rolling. Tribol Int. 2011;44(9):971–979. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2011.03.029
102.
RaviN, MarkandeyaR, JoshiSV.Effect of substrate roughness on adhesion and tribological properties of nc-TiAlN/a-Si3N4nanocomposite coatings deposited by cathodic arc PVD process. Surf Eng. 2017;33(1):7–19. doi:10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000005
103.
ZoestbergenE, De HossonJTM.Crack resistance of PVD coatings: influence of surface treatment prior to deposition. Surf Eng. 2002;18(4):283–288. doi:10.1179/026708402225006169
104.
XieH, JiangB, HuX, . Synergistic effect of MoS2 and SiO2 nanoparticles as lubricant additives for magnesium alloy–steel contacts. Nanomaterials. 2017;7(7):154. doi:10.3390/nano7070154
105.
ZhangY, WangZ, YoshikawaY, . Experimental investigation on friction law under starved lubrication in metal forming. Procedia Eng. 2017;207:2269–2273. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.993
106.
WeiD, HuangJ, ZhangA, . The effect of oxide scale of stainless steels on friction and surface roughness in hot rolling. Wear. 2011;271(9):2417–2425. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2010.11.029
107.
MuntherPA, LenardJG.The effect of scaling on interfacial friction in hot rolling of steels. J Mater Process Technol. 1999;88(1):105–113. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00392-6
108.
ChengX, JiangZ, ZhaoJ, . Investigation of oxide scale on ferritic stainless steel B445J1M and its tribological effect in Hot rolling. Wear. 2015;338-339:178–188. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2015.06.014
109.
UtsunomiyaH, NakagawaT, MatsumotoR.Mechanism of oxide scale to decrease friction in Hot steel rolling. Procedia Manuf. 2018;15:46–51. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.168
110.
VergneC, BoherC, GrasR, . Influence of oxides on friction in Hot rolling: experimental investigations and tribological modelling. Wear. 2006;260(9):957–975. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2005.06.005
111.
SahNK, SinghR, SharmaV.Experimental investigations into thermophysical, wettability and tribological characteristics of ionic liquid based metal cutting fluids. J Manuf Process. 2021;65:190–205. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.019
112.
HwangY, AhnY, ShinH, . Investigation on characteristics of thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids. Curr Appl Phys. 2006;6(6):1068–1071. doi:10.1016/j.cap.2005.07.021
113.
WeiD, HuangJ, ZhangA, . Study on the oxidation of stainless steels 304 and 304L in humid air and the friction during hot rolling. Wear. 2009;267(9):1741–1745. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2008.11.030
114.
YuX, JiangZ, WeiD, . Tribological properties of magnetite precipitate from oxide scale in hot-rolled microalloyed steel. Wear. 2013;302(1):1286–1294. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2013.01.015
115.
MurshedS, LeongK, YangC.Enhanced thermal conductivity of TiO2 – water based nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci. 2005;44(4):367–373. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2004.12.005
116.
YuX, JiangZ, ZhaoJ, . The role of oxide-scale microtexture on tribological behaviour in the nanoparticle lubrication of hot rolling. Tribol Int. 2016;93:190–201. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.049
117.
KatoH, KomaiK.Tribofilm formation and mild wear by tribo-sintering of nanometer-sized oxide particles on rubbing steel surfaces. Wear. 2007;262(1):36–41. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2006.03.046
118.
DasA, PradhanO, PatelSK, . Performance appraisal of various nanofluids during hard machining of AISI 4340 steel. J Manuf Process. 2019;46:248–270. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.023
119.
GunjalSU, PatilNG.Experimental investigations into turning of hardened AISI 4340 steel using vegetable based cutting fluids under minimum quantity lubrication. Procedia Manuf. 2018;20:18–23. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.003
120.
MakhesanaMA, PatelKM, KhannaN.Analysis of vegetable oil-based nano-lubricant technique for improving machinability of inconel 690. J Manuf Process. 2022;77:708–721. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.03.060
121.
SellarsCM, WhitemanJA.Recrystallization and grain growth in hot rolling. Met Sci. 1979;13(3):187–194. doi:10.1179/msc.1979.13.3-4.187
122.
ChenB, ThomsonP, ChoiS.Temperature distribution in the roll-gap during hot flat rolling. J Mater Process Technol. 1992;30(1):115–130. doi:10.1016/0924-0136(92)90042-Q
123.
MatsuokaS, MoritaM, FurukimiO, . Recrystallization and related phenomena. Effect of lubrication condition on recrystallization texture of ultra-low C sheet steel hot-rolled in ferrite region. ISIJ Int. 1998;38(6):633–639. doi:10.2355/isijinternational.38.633
124.
HuhM, ChoY, EnglerO.Effect of lubrication on the evolution of microstructure and texture during rolling and recrystallization of copper. Mater Sci Eng A. 1998;247(1):152–164. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00772-7
125.
ZhangC, WuR, SongC, . The grain refining and strengthening mechanism of C-Mn steel by CSP. Adv Mat Res. 2011;261:712–716.
126.
HoreS, DasS, BanerjeeS, . Computational modelling of static recrystallization and two dimensional microstructure evolution during hot strip rolling of advanced high strength steel. J Manuf Process. 2015;17:78–87. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.07.009
127.
MengY, SunJ, HeJ, . Metallographic structure improvement of hot rolled strip induced by high temperature diffusion of MoS2 nano-lubricant. J Manuf Process. 2022;81:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.06.052
128.
LenardJ, KalpakjianS.The effect of temperature on the coefficient of friction in flat rolling. CIRP Ann. 1991;40(1):223–226. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61973-8
129.
RossNS, SrinivasanN, AmuthaP, . Thermo-physical, tribological and machining characteristics of Hastelloy C276 under sustainable cooling/lubrication conditions. J Manuf Process. 2022;80:397–413. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.06.018
130.
KumarN, SonawaneSS.Experimental study of thermal conductivity and convective heat transfer enhancement using CuO and TiO2 nanoparticles. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 2016;76:98–107. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.04.028
131.
ÖzerinçS, KakaçS, YazıcıoğluAG.Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a state-of-the-art review. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2010;8(2):145–170. doi:10.1007/s10404-009-0524-4
132.
San-MiguelA.Nanomaterials under high-pressure. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006;35(10):876–889. doi:10.1039/b517779k.
133.
EsmailpourAA, ZarghamiR, MostoufiN.Effect of temperature on the nanoparticles agglomerates fluidization. Int Conf Appl Math Simul Modell. 2015: 242–245.
134.
AkramM, ArshadN, BraemA.Nanoparticle-modified coatings by electrophoretic deposition for corrosion protection of magnesium. Surf Eng. 2022;38(4):430–439. doi:10.1080/02670844.2022.2095151
135.
KadkhodaeeM, Abdollah-zadehA, AssadiH, . Cold-spray manufacturing of Zn/ZnO nanocomposite targets for ZnO sputtering. Surf Eng. 2022;38(5):465–471. doi:10.1080/02670844.2022.2106346
136.
ZhouY, MaY, QiC, . Superhydrophobic surface based on nano-engineering for enhancing the durability of anticorrosion. Surf Eng. 2021;37(3):288–298. doi:10.1080/02670844.2020.1776668
137.
ZengC, WangY, GaoC, . Hierarchical Cu2O/CuO/TiO2 composite films with high superhydrophobicity and strong adhesion. Surf Eng. 2021;37(10):1223–1230. doi:10.1080/02670844.2021.1873899
