This study investigates the effects of the electroplating process parameters, such as temperature, graphene concentration in the bath and current density, on the electrical properties of a copper-coated aluminium alloy (AA6082). Based on previous experiences, a full factorial plan was developed and tested through the Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology to find a relation between parameters and properties. After validating the setup and the significance of the three input process parameters, a statistical model for copper electrodeposition is presented; the latter takes into account the physical interaction of the graphene nanoplatelets (GNP). From the results, the GNP amount is able to modify the electrical resistance of the copper coating; in detail, the resistance passes from 0.0319 to 0.02 mΩ, allowing a reduction of about 35% at the highest GNP content. Furthermore, an optimization following the new experimental model to decrease the electrical resistance of the graphene-based coating is presented.
BorkarS.Low power design challenges for the decade. Proc. Asia South Pacific Des. Autom. Conf. ASP-DAC. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2001: p. 293–296. doi:10.1109/ASPDAC.2001.913321.
2.
BorkarS.Design challenges of technology scaling. IEEE Micro. 1999;19:23–29. doi:10.1109/40.782564.
3.
DunnP, ReayDA. Heat pipes, Opp. 1976.
4.
MochizukiM.Latest development and application of heat pipes for electronics and automotive. 2017 IEEE CPMT Symp. Japan, ICSJ 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017: p. 87–90. doi:10.1109/ICSJ.2017.8240095
5.
OlabiAG, AbdelkareemMA, WilberforceT, . Application of graphene in energy storage device – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;135:110026, doi:10.1016/J.RSER.2020.110026.
6.
SunZ, FangS, HuYH.3D graphene materials: from understanding to design and synthesis control. Chem Rev. 2020;120:10336–10453. doi:10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.0C00083/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/CR0C00083_0037.GIF.
7.
LuM, ZhangX, JiJ, . Research progress on power battery cooling technology for electric vehicles. J Energy Storage. 2020;27:101155, doi:10.1016/J.EST.2019.101155.
8.
MooreAL, ShiL.Emerging challenges and materials for thermal management of electronics. Mater Today. 2014;17:163–174. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.04.003.
9.
FanL, KhodadadiJM.Thermal conductivity enhancement of phase change materials for thermal energy storage: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15:24–46. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.08.007.
10.
TarcanR, Todor-BoerO, PetrovaiI, . Reduced graphene oxide today. J Mater Chem C. 2020;8:1198–1224. doi:10.1039/C9TC04916A.
11.
Castro NetoAH, GuineaF, PeresNMR, . The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys. 2009;81:109–162. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109.
12.
LeoneC, Di SienaM, GennaS, . Effect of graphite nanoplatelets percentage on the in plane thermal diffusivity of ultra-thin graphene based (nanostructured) composite. Opt Laser Technol. 2022;146:107552, doi:10.1016/J.OPTLASTEC.2021.107552.
13.
TiwariSK, SahooS, WangN, . Graphene research and their outputs: status and prospect. J Sci Adv Mater Devices. 2020;5:10–29. doi:10.1016/J.JSAMD.2020.01.006.
14.
SunPZ, YangQ, KuangWJ, . Limits on gas impermeability of graphene. Nature. 2020;5797798(579):229–232. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2070-x.
Cárdenas ContrerasEM, OliveiraGA, Bandarra FilhoEP.Experimental analysis of the thermohydraulic performance of graphene and silver nanofluids in automotive cooling systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;132:375–387. doi:10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2018.12.014.
19.
NovoselovKS, GeimAK, MorozovSV, . Electric field in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004;80(306):666–669. doi:10.1126/science.1102896.
20.
NovoselovKS.Nobel lecture: graphene: materials in the flatland. Rev Mod Phys. 2011;83:837–849. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.837.
TanYW, ZhangY, BolotinK, . Measurement of scattering rate and minimum conductivity in graphene. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;99; doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246803.
23.
BalandinAA, GhoshS, BaoW, . Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008;8:902–907. doi:10.1021/nl0731872.
YinZ, ZhuJ, HeQ, . Graphene-Based materials for solar cell applications. Adv Energy Mater. 2014;4:1300574), doi:10.1002/aenm.201300574.
26.
StollerMD, ParkS, YanwuZ, . Graphene-Based ultracapacitors. Nano Lett. 2008;8:3498–3502. doi:10.1021/nl802558y.
27.
ZhangH, YangD, LauA, . Hybridized graphene for supercapacitors: beyond the limitation of pure graphene. Small. 2021;17:2007311, doi:10.1002/SMLL.202007311.
28.
JustinoCIL, GomesAR, FreitasAC, . Graphene based sensors and biosensors. TrAC - Trends Anal Chem. 2017;91:53–66. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2017.04.003.
29.
HuangH, SuS, WuN, . Graphene-based sensors for human health monitoring. Front Chem. 2019;7; doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00399.
30.
AsadiE, Fassadi ChimehA, HosseinA, . A review of clinical applications of graphene quantum dot-based composites. J Compos Compd. 2019;1:31–40. doi:10.29252/JCC.1.1.6.
WangJ, JinX, LiC, . Graphene and graphene derivatives toughening polymers: toward high toughness and strength. Chem Eng J. 2019;370:831–854. doi:10.1016/J.CEJ.2019.03.229.
WangB, RuanT, ChenY, . Graphene-based composites for electrochemical energy storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2020;24:22–51. doi:10.1016/J.ENSM.2019.08.004.
35.
ParvezK, WuZS, LiR, . Exfoliation of graphite into graphene in aqueous solutions of inorganic salts. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:6083–6091. doi:10.1021/ja5017156.
36.
HuangX, ZhiC, LinY, . Thermal conductivity of graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng R Reports. 2020;142:100577, doi:10.1016/J.MSER.2020.100577.
AlmontiD, SimonciniM, TagliaferriV, . Electrodeposition of graphene nanoplatelets on CPU cooler—experimental and numerical investigation. Mater Manuf Process. 2018;33:220–226. doi:10.1080/10426914.2017.1303165.
43.
AlmontiD, UcciardelloN.Improvement of thermal properties of micro head engine electroplated by graphene: experimental and thermal simulation. Mater Manuf Process. 2019;34:1612–1619. doi:10.1080/10426914.2019.1594263.
44.
IbañezA, FatásE.Mechanical and structural properties of electrodeposited copper and their relation with the electrodeposition parameters. Surf Coatings Technol. 2005;191:7–16. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.05.001.
45.
TaoS, LiDY.Tribological, mechanical and electrochemical properties of nanocrystalline copper deposits produced by pulse electrodeposition. Nanotechnology. 2006;17:65–78. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/17/1/012.
46.
KumarS, PandeS, VermaP. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology Factor Effecting Electrodeposition Process. 2015. Available from: http://inpressco.com/category/ijcet (accessed January 24, 2020).
47.
AntenucciA, GuarinoS, TagliaferriV, . Electrodeposition of graphene on aluminium open cell metal foams. Mater Des. 2015;71:78–84. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.01.004.
48.
MandolfinoC, LertoraE, GennaS, . Effect of laser and plasma surface cleaning on mechanical properties of adhesive bonded joints. Procedia CIRP. 2015;33:458–463. doi:10.1016/J.PROCIR.2015.06.054.
49.
AntenucciA, GuarinoS, TagliaferriV, . Improvement of the mechanical and thermal characteristics of open cell aluminum foams by the electrodeposition of Cu. Mater Des. 2014;59:124–129. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.004.
50.
MontgomeryDC, WileyJ. Design and analysis of experiments eighth edition. 2013. Available from: www.wiley.com/go/permissions. (accessed September 30, 2021).
LeeH, NixWD, WongSS.Studies of the driving force for room-temperature microstructure evolution in electroplated copper films. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Nanom Struct. 2004;22:2369, doi:10.1116/1.1788680.
54.
Castrejón-SánchezVH, SolisAC, LópezR, . Thermal oxidation of copper over a broad temperature range: towards the formation of cupric oxide (CuO). Mater Res Express. 2019;6:075909, doi:10.1088/2053-1591/AB1662.
55.
MokhtariO, RoshanghiasA, AshayerR, . Disabling of nanoparticle effects at increased temperature in nanocomposite solders. J Electron Mater. 2012;41:1907–1914. doi:10.1007/S11664-012-1976-Y.
56.
GennaS, TagliaferriF, PapaI, . Multi-response optimization of CFRP laser milling process based on response surface methodology. Polym Eng Sci. 2017;57:595–605. doi:10.1002/pen.24560.
