Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surfaces are widely used in many fields. Inspired by the structure of water strider legs, we proposed a simple method to construct a superamphiphobic surface based on burr-like KH-PS (copolymer of styrene and γ-Methacryloxypropyl trimethoxy silane) nanoparticles by soap-free emulsion polymerization and hydrolytic condensation reaction. In order to improve the film-forming properties and adhesion between coating and substrate, fluoromonomer-containing polysiloxane acrylate (PA) is designed and synthesized to bond burr-like nanoparticles. Then modify the fluorine-containing material on the surface of the burr-like particles to reduce the surface energy. The contact angles of the coating to water, diiodomethane, hexadecane, soybean oil, and rapeseed oil are 164.2° ± 1.5°, 155.3° ± 1.7°, 148.6° ± 1.9°, 152.7° ± 1.6°, and 153.5° ± 1.7°, respectively. The superamphiphobic coating exhibits excellent thermal stability, chemical stability, and self-cleaning performance. The microscopic roughness of coating constructed by organic polymer particles has broader application prospects on soft substrates such as fabrics.
CaoY, SalviniA, CamaitiM.One-step fabrication of robust and durable superamphiphobic, self-cleaning surface for outdoor and in situ application on building substrates. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;591:239–252. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.001.
4.
DalawaiSP, AlyMS, LattheSS, Recent advances in durability of superhydrophobic self-cleaning technology: a critical review. Prog Org Coat. 2020;138:105381–105396. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105381.
5.
ZhaoD, PanM, YuanJ, A waterborne coating for robust superamphiphobic surfaces. Prog Org Coat. 2020;138:105368–105375. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105368.
6.
ZhaoX, SunM, DuanY, Superhydrophobic coatings based on raspberry-like nanoparticles and their applications on cotton. Colloids Surf A. 2020;602:125039–125047. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125039.
7.
GhasemlouM, DaverF, IvanovaEP, Bio-inspired sustainable and durable superhydrophobic materials: from nature to market. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7:16643–16670. doi:10.1039/C9TA05185F.
MaW, DingY, ZhangM, Nature-inspired chemistry toward hierarchical superhydrophobic, antibacterial and biocompatible nanofibrous membranes for effective UV-shielding, self-cleaning and oil-water separation. J Hazard Mater. 2020;384:121476. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121476.
10.
SchmüserL, ZhangW, MarxMT, Role of surface chemistry in the superhydrophobicity of the springtail orchesella cincta (Insecta:Collembola). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:12294–12304. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b21615.
11.
RakitovR, GorbSN.Brochosomal coats turn leafhopper (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) integument to superhydrophobic state. Proc R Soc B. 2013;280:20122391. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2391.
BushJWM, HuDL, PrakashM.The integument of water-walking arthropods: form and function. Adv Insect Physiol. 2007;34:117–192. doi:10.1016/S0065-2806(07)34003-4.
14.
LiuK, DuJ, WuJ, Superhydrophobic gecko feet with high adhesive forces towards water and their bio-inspired materials. Nanoscale. 2012;4:768–772. doi:10.1039/c1nr11369k.
15.
ShaoC, ChiJ, ChenZ, Superwettable colloidal crystal micropatterns on butterfly wing surface for ultrasensitive detection. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;546:122–129. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.064.
16.
Roxana-ElenaA, MihaelaG, CristinaDP, Superhydrophobic natural and artificial surfaces – a structural approach. Materials. 2018;11:866–889. doi:10.3390/ma11050866.
17.
DewanR, FischerS, Meyer-RochowVB, Studying nanostructured nipple arrays of moth eye facets helps to design better thin film solar cells. Bioinspir Biomim. 2012;7:016003. doi:10.1088/1748-3182/7/1/016003.
18.
ShaoY, ZhaoJ, FanY, Shape memory superhydrophobic surface with switchable transition between ‘lotus effect’ to ‘rose petal effect’. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;382:122989. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122989.
19.
BarthlottW, SchimmelT, WierschS, Superhydrophobic coatings: the Salvinia paradox: superhydrophobic surfaces with hydrophilic pins for air retention under water. Adv Mater2010;22:2325. doi:10.1002/adma.201090075.
20.
LiG, JiangB, LiuH, Superhydrophobic surface with lotus/petal effect and its improvement on fatigue resistance of heat-resistant steel. Prog Org Coat. 2019;137:105315–105324. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105315.
21.
WangD, HuangJ, GuoZ.Tomato-lotus inspired edible superhydrophobic artificial lotus leaf. Chem Eng J. 2020;400:125883. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.125883.
ZhouK, LiD, XueP, One-step fabrication of Salvinia-inspired superhydrophobic surfaces with high adhesion. Colloids Surf A. 2020;590:124517–124523. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124517.
24.
ZhaoX, HaoH, DuanY, A robust superhydrophobic and highly oleophobic coating based on F-SiO2-copolymer composites. Prog Org Coat. 2019;135:417–423. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.06.024.
25.
ZhengG, ZhangD, ZhengC, Facile fabrication of biomimetic superoleophobic composite coating via Schiff base reaction and self-assembly. Prog Org Coat. 2020;142:105568–105576. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105568.
26.
QuM, MaX, HouL, Fabrication of durable superamphiphobic materials on various substrates with wear-resistance and self-cleaning performance from kaolin. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;456:737–750. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.194.
27.
EllinasK. Superhydrophobic and superamphiphobic smart surfaces, advances in smart coatings and thin films for future industrial and biomedical engineering applications. Chapter 18 – Superhydrophobic and superamphiphobic smart surfaces. 2020;18:487–514. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-849870-5.00015-X.
28.
EllinasK, TserepiA, GogolidesE.Durable superhydrophobic and superamphiphobic polymeric surfaces and their applications: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;250:132–157. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2017.09.003.
29.
WangH, ZhangZ, WangZ, Multistimuli-responsive microstructured superamphiphobic surfaces with large-range, reversible switchable wettability for oil. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:28478–28486. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b07941.
30.
ChenAF, HuangHX.Rapid fabrication of T-shaped micropillars on polypropylene surfaces with robust Cassie-Baxter state for quantitative droplet collection. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:1556–1561. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10079.
31.
GouX, GuoZ.Surface topographies of biomimetic superamphiphobic materials: design criteria, fabrication and performance. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;269:87–121. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2019.04.007.
32.
TuominenM, TeisalaH, HaapanenJ, Superamphiphobic overhang structured coating on a biobased material. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;389:135–143. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.095.
33.
DarmaninT, GuittardF.Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties in nature. Mater Today. 2015;18:273–285. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.001.
34.
NeinhuisWB.Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta. 1997;202:1–8. doi:10.2307/23384993.
35.
ChenS, ZhuM, ZhangY, Magnetic-responsive superhydrophobic surface of magnetorheological elastomers mimicking from lotus leaves to rose petals. Langmuir. 2021;37:2312–2321. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03122.
36.
YinW, ZhengYL, LuHY, Three-dimensional topographies of water surface dimples formed by superhydrophobic water strider legs. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;109:663–2310. doi:10.1063/1.4964788.
37.
LiuH, WangY, HuangJ, Bioinspired surfaces with superamphiphobic properties: concepts, synthesis, and applications. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1707415. 1–27. doi:10.1002/adfm.201707415.
38.
CassieABD, BaxterS.Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc.1944;40:546–551. doi:10.1039/tf9444000546.
