The behaviours of ultrasonic peening treatment induced effects near the edges of weld toe were investigated. The deformed weld toe profiles were observed and numerical models were established to calculate the stress concentration factor for the middle and the edges of the specimen. Micro-hardness profiles were also measured in the subsurface layer. The results revealed that comparing with the middle position the stress concentration is lower, the macro deformation is larger, and the strain hardening characterised by the increase of hardness is less significant at the edges. Finite element analysis was employed to predict the residual stress distribution under different peening sequences and it was found that tensile stresses appeared at the starting edge, and relatively smaller compressive stresses existed at the ending edge. The optimal peening strategy should be starting the treatment inside and moving out towards the edges.
RolandT, RetraintD, LuK, Fatigue life improvement through surface nanostructuring of stainless steel by means of surface mechanical attrition treatment. Scripta Mater. 2006;54:1949–1954. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.049
2.
LiD, ChenH, XuH.Comparative responses of welded joints to surface mechanical attrition treatment and shot peening. Surf Eng.2009;25:15–20. doi: 10.1179/174329409X389335
3.
AzadmanjiriJ, BerndtCC, KapoorA, Development of surface nano-crystallization in alloys by surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT). Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci.2015;40(3):164–181. doi: 10.1080/10408436.2014.978446
GaoYK, WuXR.Experimental investigation and fatigue life prediction for 7475-T7351 aluminum alloy with and without shot peening-induced residual stresses. Acta Mater.2011;59:3737–3747. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.013
6.
BagheriS, GuaglianoM.Review of shot peening processes to obtain nanocrystalline surfaces in metal alloys. Surf Eng.2009;25(1):3–14. doi: 10.1179/026708408X334087
7.
AltenbergerI, ScholtesB, MartinU, ‘Cyclic deformation and near surface microstructures of shot peened or deep rolled austenitic stainless steel AISI 304.Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;264:1–16. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01121-6
8.
de los RiosER, WalleyA, MilanMT, Fatigue crack initiation and propagation on shot-peened surfaces in A316 stainless steel. Int J Fatigue. 1995;17:493–499. doi: 10.1016/0142-1123(95)00044-T
9.
RoyS, FisherJW, YenBT.Fatigue resistance of welded details enhanced by ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT). Int J Fatigue. 2013;25(9–11):1239–1247. doi: 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00151-8
10.
ZhaoX, WangM, ZhangZ, The effect of ultrasonic peening treatment on fatigue performance of welded joints. Materials. 2016;9:471–479. doi: 10.3390/ma9060471
11.
YildirimHC, LeitnerM, MarquisGB, Application studies for fatigue strength improvement of welded structures by high-frequency mechanical impact (HFMI) treatment. Eng Struct.2016;106:422–435. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.044
12.
GhahremaniK, WalbridgeS.Fatigue testing and analysis of peened highway bridge welds under in-service variable amplitude loading conditions. Int J Fatigue. 2011;33:300–312. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.004
13.
ZhangH, WangD, XiaL, Effects of ultrasonic impact treatment on pre-fatigue loaded high-strength steel welded joints. Int J Fatigue. 2015;80:278–287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.017
14.
MasayukiT, ChitoshiM.Fatigue strength improvement by hammer peening treatment-verification from plastic deformation, residual stress, and fatigue crack propagation rate. Weld World. 2014;58:307–318. doi: 10.1007/s40194-014-0115-1
15.
ChengX, FisherJW, PraskHJ, Residual stress modification by post-weld treatment and its beneficial effect on fatigue strength of welded structures. Int J Fatigue. 2003;25:1259–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.020
16.
YektaRT, GhahremaniK, WalbridgeS.Effect of quality control parameter variations on the fatigue performance of ultrasonic impact treated welds. Int J Fatigue. 2013;55:245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.06.023
17.
ArakawaJ, KakutaM, HayashiY, Fatigue strength of USP treated ASTM CA6NM for hydraulic turbine runner. Surf Eng.2014;30:662–669. doi: 10.1179/1743294414Y.0000000308
18.
ShimanukiH, OkawaT.Effect of stress ratio on the enhancement of fatigue strength in high performance steel welded joints by ultrasonic impact treatment. Int J Steel Struct.2013;13:155–161. doi: 10.1007/s13296-013-1014-9
19.
PolezhayevaH, HowarthD, KumarM, The effect of compressive fatigue loads on fatigue strength of non-load carrying specimens subjected to ultrasonic impact treatment. Weld World.2015;59:713–721. doi: 10.1007/s40194-015-0247-y
20.
DaavariM, VaniniSAS.The effect of ultrasonic peening on service life of the butt-welded high-temperature steel pipes. J Mater Eng Perform.2015;24:3658–3665. doi: 10.1007/s11665-015-1644-5
21.
SunG, FangX, TongZ, Effect of laser shock peening on aluminium alloy laser-welds. Surf Eng. 2016; 32:943–948.
22.
CorreaC, de LaraLR, DiazM, Influence of pulse sequence and edge material effect on fatigue life of Al2024-T351 specimens treated by laser shock processing. Int J Fatigue. 2015;70:196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.015
23.
BhamareS, RamakrishnanG, MannavaSR, Simulation-based optimization of laser shock peening process for improved bending fatigue life of Ti–6Al–2Sn–4Zr–2Mo alloy. Surf Coat Technol.2013;232:464–474. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.003
24.
XuJ, KochWJ.Finite-element analysis of the influence of edge geometry on shot peening process. J Aerospace Eng.2009;22:153–159. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:2(153)
25.
LRFD bridge construction specifications, AASHO, 2010.
26.
ChaiseT, LiJ, NeliasD, Modelling of multiple impacts for the prediction of distortions and residual stresses induced by ultrasonic shot peening (USP). J Mater Process Technol.2012;212:2080–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.05.005
27.
GaoH.Residual stress development due to high-frequency post weld impact treatments for high-strength steels [PhD thesis]. Netherlands Institute for Metal Research; 2014.
28.
WangR, LiX, YinY.Investigation on microstructure in shot peening surface straining layer of materials. J Aeronaut Mater.1981;1:30–38.
