In this work, a novel method of selecting the most favourable electropolishing (EP) conditions is presented as a compromise between the processing time and obtaining the lowest possible roughness value of Sa or Sq (commonly used parameters) as well as the gradual increase of parameters highlighted in this work Ssk and Sku. The results showed that the most appropriate EP charge input should be higher than 1.2 Amin cm−2 and lower than 2.3 Amin cm−2. XPS high-resolution spectra revealed that pickling and EP of the samples results in a decrease of the ratio of the iron oxides amount (at.-%) to the total amount of chromium oxides and hydroxides (at.-%) in the passive film. This ratio gradually decreases reaching the values 1.2, 1.0 and 0.7 for as-received, pickled and electropolished samples, respectively. This result demonstrates iron dissolution of the outer surface layer by pickling and EP.
LinC. C., HuC. C. and LeeT. C.: ‘Electropolishing of 304 stainless steel: interactive effects of glycerol content, bath temperature, and current density on surface roughness and morphology’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2009, 204, 448–454. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.08.005
3.
BaronA., SimkaW., NawratG. and SzewieczekD.:‘Electropolishing and chemical passivation of austenitic Steel’, J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng., 2008, 31, (2), 197–202.
4.
LochyńskiP., łyczkowskaE., PawełczykA. and SzczygiełB.: ‘Effect of bath exploitation on steel electropolishing process efficiency’, Przem. Chem., 2012, 91, 846–848.
5.
łyczkowskaE., LochyńskiP. and ChlebusE.: ‘Electropolishing of a stainless steel’, Przem. Chem., 2013, 92, 1364–1366.
6.
AndradeL., XavierS., Rocha-FilhoR., BocchiN. and BiaggioS.: ‘Electropolishing of AISI-304 stainless steel using an oxidizing solution originally used for electrochemical coloration’, Electrochim. Acta, 2005, 50, 2623–2627. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.11.007
7.
NúñezP. J., García-PlazaE., HernandoM. and TrujilloR.: ‘Characterization of surface finish of electropolished stainless steel AISI 316L with varying electrolyte concentrations’, Proc. Eng., 2013, 63, 771–778. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.255
8.
LatifiA., ImaniM., KhorasaniM. T. and JoupariM. D.: ‘Electrochemical and chemical methods for improving surface characteristics of 316L stainless steel for biomedical applications’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 221, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.01.020
9.
HryniewiczT. and RokoszK.: ‘Corrosion resistance of magnetoelectropolished AISI 316L SS biomaterial’, Anti-Corros. Method M, 2014, 61, 57–64. doi: 10.1108/ACMM-03-2013-1249
10.
SlaneyA. M., WrightV. A., MeloncelliP. J., HarrisK. D., WestL. J., LowaryT. L. and BuriakJ. M.: ‘Biocompatible carbohydrate-functionalized stainless steel surfaces: a new method for passivating biomedical implants’, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2011, 3, 1601–1612. doi: 10.1021/am200158y
11.
HryniewiczT., RokickiT. and RokoszR. K.: ‘Surface characterization of AISI 316L biomaterials obtained by electropolishing in a magnetic field’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, 202, 1668–1673. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.07.067
12.
NazneenF., GalvinP., ArriganD. W., ThompsonM., BenvenutoP. and HerzogP.: ‘Electropolishing of medical-grade stainless steel in preparation for surface nano-texturing’, J. Solid State Electrochem., 2012, 16, 1389–1397. doi: 10.1007/s10008-011-1539-9
13.
VaraG. A., ButrónE. J. and Gacía-BlancoM. B.: ‘Challenges and opportunities in next generation of electropolishing surfaces’, Surf. Eng., 2015, 31, 397–398. doi: 10.1179/0267084415Z.000000000624
BettiniE., ErikssonT., BoströmM., LeygrafC. and PanJ.: ‘Influence of metal carbides on dissolution behavior of biomedical CoCrMo alloy: SEM, TEM and AFM studies’, Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 56, (25), 9413–9419. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.028
16.
SikoraA.: ‘Development and utilization of the nanomarkers for precise AFM Tip positioning in the investigation of the surface morphology change’, Opt. Appl., 2013, 43, (1), 163–171.
17.
SikoraA.: ‘Improvement of the scanning area positioning repeatability using the nanomarkers developed with nanoscratching method’, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2014, 25, 055401. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/25/5/055401
18.
IwanA., BoharewiczB., TazbirI., SikoraA., MalińskiM., Chrobakł. and MadejW.: ‘Laser beam induced current technique of polymer solar cells based on new poly(azomethine) or poly(3-hexylthiophene)’, Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett., 2015, 4, (14), 597–607.
19.
KambleS. S., SikoraA., PawarS. T., KambaleR. C., MaldarN. N. and DeshmukhL. P.: ‘Morphology reliance of cobalt sulfide thin films: a chemo-thermo-mechanical perception’, J. Alloy. Compd., 2015, 631, 303–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.097
20.
WangX. Y., WuY. S., ZhangL. and YuZ. Y.: ‘Atomic force microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study on the passive film for type 316L stainless steel’, Corrosion, 2001, 57, 540–546. doi: 10.5006/1.3290380
21.
KimY. B. and ParkJ. W.: ‘Corrosion rate evaluation of pulse electrochemical polishing for stainless steel’, Adv. Sci. Lett., 2012, 14, 227–230. doi: 10.1166/asl.2012.4018
22.
Jiménez-PichardoaR., RegaladoaC., Castaño-TostadoaE., Meas-VongbY., Santos-CruzaJ. and García-AlmendárezaB. E.: ‘Evaluation of electrolyzed water as cleaning and disinfection agent on stainless steel as a model surface in the dairy industry’, Food Control, 2016, 50, 320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.08.011
23.
ChungH. J., RheeK. Y., KimM. T. and JungY. C.: ‘Surface treatment of stainless steel to improve coating strength of ZrO2 coated stainless steel needle’, Surf. Eng., 2011, 27, 145–148.
BiesingerM. C., PayneB. P., GrosvenorA. P., LauL. W. M., GersonA. R. and SmartR. S. C.: ‘Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first Row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2011, 257, 2717–2730. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051
26.
HryniewiczT., RokoszK. and RokickiR.: ‘Electrochemical and XPS studies of AISI 316L stainless steel after electropolishing in a magnetic field’, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50, 2676–2681. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.06.048
27.
LiL., BreedveldV. and HessD. W.: ‘Creation of superhydrophobic stainless steel surfaces by acid treatments and hydrophobic film deposition’, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 4549–4556. doi: 10.1021/am301666c
28.
MarcusP.: ‘XPS study of the passive films formed on nitrogen-implanted austenitic stainless steels’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 1992, 57, 7–21. doi: 10.1016/0169-4332(92)90163-R
29.
De VitoE. and MarcusP.: ‘XPS study of passive films formed on molybdenum-implanted austenitic stainless steels’, Surf. Interface Anal., 1992, 19, 403–408. doi: 10.1002/sia.740190175
30.
CastleJ. E. and QiuJ. H.: ‘Application of ICP-MS and XPS to studies of Ion selectivity during passivation of stainless steels’, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1990, 137, 2031–2038. doi: 10.1149/1.2086860
31.
GuerreroR., CotaL. and MachorroR.: ‘Electropolishing of zinalco and characterisation of resulting surface’, Surf. Eng., 1999, 5, 418–422. doi: 10.1179/026708499101516722
