New results about the scratch practical adhesion-resistance of the CoB–Co2B/substrate system developed at the surface of CoCrMo (ASTM-F75) alloy were estimated. The boron diffusion on the surface of the cobalt alloy was conducted using the powder-pack boriding process at temperatures of 1223 and 1273 K with different exposure times for each temperature. The scratch tests over the surface of cobalt borided alloy were performed with a 200 micrometres Rockwell C diamond indenter considering a continuously increasing normal force for the entire set of experimental conditions of the boriding process. The worn tracks produced on the coating/substrate system were analysed by optical and scanning electron microscopy to estimate and identify the critical loads and failure mechanisms, respectively. The results indicated that the critical loads varied between 95 and 142 N as a function of the boride coating thicknesses with a development of various types of failure mechanisms over the surface of the coating/substrate system.
SadiqK., StackM. M., and BlackR. A.: ‘Wear mapping of CoCrMo alloy in simulated bio-tribocorrosion conditions of a hip prosthesis bearing in calf serum solution’, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2015,
49, 452–462. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.004
2.
GuoZ., PangX., YanY., GaoK., VolinskyA. A., and ZangT. Y.: ‘CoCrMo alloy for orthopedic implant application enhanced corrosion and tribocorrosion properties by nitrogen ion implantation’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015,
347, 23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.054
3.
KrellingA. P., MilanJ. C. G., and da CostaC. E.: ‘Tribological behaviour of borided H13 steel with different boriding agents’, Surf. Eng., 2015,
31, 581–587. doi: 10.1179/1743294414Y.0000000423
4.
JohnstonJ. M., JubinskyM., and CatledgeS. A.: ‘Plasma boriding of a cobalt-chromium alloy as an interlayer for nanostructured diamond growth’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015,
328, 133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.129
5.
MuD., and ShenBao-luo: ‘Mechanical and dry-sliding wear properties of boronized pure cobalt using boronizing powders with SiC as diluent’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013,
236, 102–106. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.09.034
6.
Rodríguez-CastroG. A., Reséndiz-CalderónC. D., Jiménez-TinocoL. F., Meneses-AmadorA., Gallardo-HernándezE. A., and Campos-SilvaI. E.: ‘Micro-abrasive wear resistance of CoB/Co2B coatings formed in CoCrMo alloy’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2015,
284, 258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.081
7.
Campos-SilvaI., Bravo-BarcenasD., Meneses-AmadorA., Ortiz-DominguezM., CimenogluH., Figueroa-LópezU., and Andraca-AdameJ.: ‘Growth kinetics and mechanical properties of boride layers formed at the surface of the ASTM F-75 biomedical alloy’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013,
237, 402–414. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.083
8.
Campos-SilvaI., Bravo-BarcenasD., CimenogluH., Figuero-LópezU., Flores-JimenezM., MeydanogluO.: ‘The boriding process in CoCrMo alloy: fracture toughness in cobalt boride coatings’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2014,
260, 362–368. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.07.092
9.
‘Metallic materials — Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters’, Part 1, ‘Test method’, ISO 14577:2002.
10.
OliverW. C., and PharrG. M.: ‘An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation’, J. Mater. Res., 1992,
7, 1564–1583. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1992.1564
11.
‘Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics) — Determination of adhesion ceramic coatings by scratch testing’, ISO 20502: 2005.
12.
Campos-SilvaI. E. and Rodríguez-CastroG. A.: ‘Boriding to improve the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of steels’ in ‘Thermochemical surface engineering of steels’, (ed. MittemeijerE. J. and SomersM. A. J.), 651–697; 2015, Cambridge: Woodhead-Elsevier Publishing.
13.
Campos-SilvaI., Bravo-BárcenasD., Flores-JiménezM., Arzate-VázquezI., López-GarcíaC., Bernabé-MolinaS.: ‘Diffusion boride coatings in CoCrMo alloy and some indentation properties’, Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal., 2015,
4, 158–168. doi: 10.1007/s13632-015-0200-x
14.
ChenK. S., ChenT. C., and OuK. S.: ‘Development of semi-empirical formulation for extracting materials properties from nanoindentation measurements: residual stresses, substrate effect and creep’, Thin Solid Films, 2008,
516, 1931–1940. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.005
15.
SueJ. A. and SchajerG. S.: ‘Stress determination in coatings’ in ‘Handbook of residual stress and deformation of steel’, (ed. TottenG., HowesM. and InoueT.), 118–124; 2002, Novelty, OH: ASM International.
16.
MotallebzadehA., DilektasliA., BaydoganM., AtarE., and CimenogluH.: ‘Evaluation of the effect of boride layer structure on the high temperature wear behavior of borided steels’, Wear, 2015,
328–329, 110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.01.029
17.
‘Standard test method for adhesion strength and mechanical failure modes of ceramic coatings by quantitative single point scratch testing’, ASTM C1624: 2005.
18.
AttarF. and JohannessonT.: ‘Adhesion evaluation of thin ceramic coatings on tool steel using the scratch testing technique’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 1996,
78, 87–102. doi: 10.1016/0257-8972(94)02396-4
19.
MalzbenderJ., den ToonderJ. M. J., BalkenendeA. R., and de WithG.: ‘Measuring mechanical properties of coatings: a methodology applied to nano-particle-filled sol-gel coatings on glass’, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2002,
R36, 47–103. doi: 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00040-7
20.
SteinmannP. A., TardyY., and HintermannH. E.: ‘Adhesion testing by the scratch test method: the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic parameters on the critical load’, Thin Solid Films, 1987,
154, 333–349. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(87)90377-4
21.
PerryA. J.: ‘Scratch adhesion testing on hard coatings’, Thin Solid Films, 1983,
107, 167–180. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(83)90019-6
22.
BullS. J.: ‘Failure mode maps in the thin film scratch test’, Tribol. Int., 1997,
30, 491–498. doi: 10.1016/S0301-679X(97)00012-1
23.
Meneses-AmadorA., Jiménez-TinocoL. F., Reséndiz-CalderónC. D., MouftiezA., Rodríguez-CastroG. A., and Campos-SilvaI.: ‘Numerical evaluation of scratch tests on boride layers’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2015,
284, 182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.088
