The burnishing process was performed using different feed rates, rotational speed and penetration depth parameters to alloy Al 7175-T6. Surface roughness, fatigue life and hardness of the samples were determined. Microstructural examinations of the samples were performed. In the surface roughness measurements, occurred a linear increase in proportion to the increasing feed rate. The increase in the penetration depth affected negatively the surface roughness. Significant increases were acquired in the fatigue life of the burnished samples. The hardness values of the burnishing samples are higher than the hardness value of the base material. The rotational movement of the steel ball during the burnishing process were been caused the aspect ratio of the grains in the microstructure to change.
Zhen-yuZQiu-yangZCongDEffect of surface burnishing process with different strain paths on the copper microstructure. J Manuf Process. 2021;71:653–668. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.09.058.
2.
AltenbergerI. Deep rolling-the past, the present and the future. 9th International Conference on Shot Peening (ICSP9) 2005;144–155.
3.
MaximovJTAnchevAPDunchevVPEffect of slide burnishing basic parameters on fatigue performance of 2024-T3 high-strength aluminium alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2017;40:1893–1904. doi:10.1111/ffe.12608.
4.
DunchevaGVMaximovJTDunchevVPImprovement in fatigue performance of 2024-T3 Al alloy via single toroidal roller burnishing. JMEPEG. 2021;30:2256–2266. doi:10.1007/s11665-021-05535-4.
5.
TugayIOHosseinzadehAYapiciGG.Hardness and wear resistance of roller burnished 316L stainless steel. Mater Today-Proc. 2021;47:2405–2409. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.363.
6.
BorysenkoDWelzelFKarpuschewskiBSimulation of the burnishing process on real surface structures. Prec Eng. 2021;68:166–173. doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.12.004.
7.
KrahmerDMPolvorosaRde LacalleLNLAlternatives for specimen manufacturing in tensile testing of steel plates. Exp Tech. 2016;40:1555–1565. doi:10.1007/s40799-016-0134-5.
8.
HassanifardSMousaviHFarahaniAV.The influence of low-plasticity burnishing process on the fatigue life of friction-stir-processed Al 7075-T6 samples. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2019;42:764–772. doi:10.1111/ffe.12950.
9.
BarahateVGovandeARTiwariGParameter optimization during single roller burnishing of AA6061-T6 alloy by design of experiments. Mater Today-Proc. 2022;50:1967–1970. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.328.
10.
El-KhabeeryMMEl-AxirMH.Experimental techniques for studying the effects of milling roller-burnishing parameters on surface integrity. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2001;41(12):1705–1719. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00036-0.
11.
BaşakHGöktaşHH.Burnishing process on Al-alloy and optimization of surface roughness and surface hardness by fuzzy logic. Mater Design. 2009;30(4):1275–1281. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.063.
12.
ZhaoJLiuZLiangGCharacterization of microstructure and mechanical properties for Ti-6Al-4V processed by rotary ultrasonic roller burnishing. Mater Charact. 2021;178:111288, doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111288.
13.
BruijnACGOmez-GrasGPerezMA.On the effect upon the surface finish and mechanical performance of ball burnishing process on fused filament fabricated parts. Additive Manuf. 2021;46:102133, doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102133.
14.
BallandPTabourotLDegreFMechanics of the burnishing process. Prec Eng. 2013;37:129–134. doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2012.07.008.
15.
RahmanMARahmanMKumaAS.Chip perforation and ‘burnishing – like’ finishing of Al alloy in precision machining. Prec Eng. 2017;50:393–409. doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.06.014.
16.
KovacsZFViharosZJKodacsyJ.Improvements of surface tribological properties by magnetic assisted ball burnishing. Surf Coat Tech. 2022;437:128317, doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128317.
17.
HanKTanLYaoCStudies on the surface characteristics of Ti60 alloy induced by turning combined with ball burnishing. J Manuf Process. 2022;76:349–364. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.019.
18.
KorzynskiMLubasJSwiradSSurface layer characteristics due to slide diamond burnishing with a cylindrical-ended tool. J Mater Process Tech. 2011;211:84–94. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.029.
19.
LeeSSGTamSCLohNHAn investigation into the ball burnishing of an AISI 1045 freeform surface. J Mater Process Tech. 1992;29:203–211. doi:10.1016/0924-0136(92)90435-U.
20.
KlockeFLiermannJ.Roller burnishing of hard turned surface. Int J Mach Tools Manufact. 1998;38(5–6):419–423. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00085-0.
21.
SönmezFBaşakHBadayŞ. Analysis of burnishing process with response surface method. G.U J Sci Part:C. 2016;4(4):275–283.
22.
El-AxirMHEl-KhabeeryMM.Influence of orthogonal burnishing parameters on surface characteristics for various materials. J Mater Process Tech. 2003;132(1–3):82–89. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00269-8.
23.
SunnySMathewsRYuHEffects of microstructure and inherent stress on residual stress induced during powder bed fusion with roller burnishing. Int J Mech Sci. 2022;219:107092, doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107092.
24.
DalliKÖzerMYılmazT The effect of feed speed on surface roughness and fatigue strength in burnishing process applied to Al 7175-T6 alloy. 3rd Int. Baku Scientific Research Cong. (2021):1043–1050.
25.
EsmeU.Use of grey based Taguchi method in ball burnishing process for the optimization of surface roughness and microhardness of AA 7075 aluminum alloy. Adv Mat Res. 2010;44:129–135.
26.
MaximovJTAnchevAPDunchevaGVImpact of slide diamond burnishing additional parameters on fatigue behaviour of 2024-T3 Al alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2019;42:363–373. doi:10.1111/ffe.12915.
27.
HuukiJUllahRLaaksoS.Process limitation of ultrasonic burnishing for commercially available martensitic stainless steel. Proc Manuf. 2020;51:885–889. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.124.
28.
RodriguezAde LacalleLNLPereiraOIsotropic finishing of austempered iron casting cylindrical parts by roller burnishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;110:753–761. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-05894-7.
29.
CharandabiFKHamidRJSoheilMModification of microstructure, hardness, and wear characteristics of an automotive-grade Al-Si alloy after friction stir processing. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2021;35(23):2696–2709. doi:10.1080/01694243.2021.1898858.
30.
JandaghiMRPouraliakbarHKhalajGStudy on the post-rolling direction of severely plastic deformed aluminum-manganese-silicon alloy. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2016;16(4):876–887. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2016.06.005.
31.
PaulischMCLentzMWemmeHThe different dependencies of the mechanical properties and microstructures on hot extrusion and artificial aging processing in case of the alloys Al 7108 and Al 7175. J Mater Process Tech. 2016;233:68–78. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.02.012.
32.
CheongMFLRouseJPHydeCJThe prediction of isothermal cyclic plasticity in 7175-T7351 aluminium alloy with particular emphasis on thermal ageing effects. Int J Fatigue. 2018;114:92–108. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.05.010.
33.
SongRGZhangQZ.Heat treatment optimization for 7175 aluminum alloy by genetic algorithm. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2001;17(1–2):133–137. doi:10.1016/S0928-4931(01)00321-6.
34.
EgeaAJSRodriguezACelentanoDJoining metrics enhancement when combining FSW and ball-burnishing in a 2050 aluminium alloy. Surf Coat Technol. 2019;367:327–335. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.04.010.
HuangBKaynakYSunYSurface layer modification by cryogenic burnishing of Al 7050-T7451 alloy and validation with FEM-based burnishing model. Proc CIRP. 2015;31:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.097.
37.
AzarRGParastMSAAzadiM.Heat-treating and nano-reinforcing improvements on fretting fatigue properties and fracture behaviors of cylinder head aluminum alloys. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;20:1927–1939. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.002.
38.
XuSChenaJShenWFatigue strength evaluation of 5059 aluminum alloy welded joints considering welding deformation and residual stress. Int J Fatıgue. 2022;162:106988, doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106988.
39.
TianyuZTengZYutingHProbabilistic model of the fatigue life of epoxy-coated aluminum alloys considering atmospheric exposure. Int J Fatıgue. 2022;162:106899, doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106899.
40.
KapidžićZ.Comparison of fatigue life and flexibility between aluminum-composite and aluminum–aluminum bolted joints. Int J Fatıgue. 2022;157:106695, doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106695.
41.
Zobaer ShahQMChowdhuryMAKowserMA.The aspect of the corrosion pitting with fretting fatigue on aluminum alloy: an aerospace structural failure or a nuclear safety phenomenon. Results Eng. 2022;15:100483, doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100483.
42.
LiuYPanQLiuBEffect of aging treatments on fatigue properties of 6005A aluminum alloy containing Sc. Int J Fatıgue. 2022;163:107103, doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107103.
43.
BanhartJ.Age hardening of aluminum alloys. In: TottenGE, editor. ASM handbook volume 4E: heat treating of nonferrous alloys. ASM International; 2016. p. 214–239. doi:10.31399/asm.hb.v04e.a0006268.
44.
PanaitNCiurdasMStephanR.Microstructural characterization of AA-7175 alloy slabs. U.P.B Sci Bull Series B. 2009;71(2):93–101.
45.
LimSTEunISNamSW.Control of equilibrium phases (M,T,S) in the modified aluminum alloy 7175 for thick forging applications. Mater Trans. 2003;44(1):181–187. doi:10.2320/matertrans.44.181.
