The diversified microstructure and complex composition of cast iron affect its friction and wear properties. In this work, three kinds of cylinder liner cast iron with different graphite morphologies were selected to analyse the friction and wear properties. Microstructure effects on tribological properties during friction were investigated by finite element simulation and pin-on-disc dry friction test. Wear mechanisms were studied using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The results show that graphite bears a considerable strain value during the friction process, which is prone to wear and fall off, and the fallen graphite can reduce the friction coefficient. Ferrite around graphite can buffer stress, but it also can reduce wear resistance. And the more significant the lamellar spacing of pearlite, the more abrasive and adhesive effect.
TungSCMcmillanML.Automotive tribology overview of current advances and challenges for the future. Tribol Int. 2004;37(7):517–536.
2.
HolmbergKAnderssonPErdemirA.Global energy consumption due to friction in passenger cars. Tribol Int. 2012;47:221–234.
3.
OlanderPHollmanPJacobsonS.Piston ring and cylinder liner wear aggravation caused by transition to greener ship transports–comparison of samples from test rig and field. Wear. 2013;302(1):1345–1350.
4.
FerrareseAMarquesGTomanikEPiston ring tribological challenges on the next generation of flex-fuel engines. SAE Int J Engines. 2010;3:85–91.
5.
KellerJFridriciVKapsaPInfluence of material nature and surface texturing on wear of heavy-duty diesel engine cylinder liners. Tribol Trans. 2008;52(1):121–126.
6.
WopelkaTCihak-BayrULenauerCWear of different material pairings for the cylinder liner – piston ring contact. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2018;70(4):687–699.
7.
ShyrokovVVArendarLAVasylivKBMechanism of the antifriction action of phosphide eutectic in cast irons. Mater Sci. 2005;41(6):824–832.
8.
BonoraNRuggieroA.Micromechanical modeling of ductile cast iron incorporating damage. Part I: ferritic ductile cast iron. Int J Solids Struct. 2005;42(5):1401–1424.
9.
WangMZhangCSunDWear behaviour and microstructure evolution of pearlitic steels under block-on-ring wear process. Mater Sci Technol. 2019;35(10):1149–1160.
10.
PrasadBK.Sliding wear response of cast iron as influenced by microstructural features and test condition. Mater Sci Eng A. 2007;456(1):373–385.
11.
TakeuchiE.The mechanisms of wear of cast iron in dry sliding. Wear. 1968;11(3):201–212.
12.
SugishitaJFujiyoshiS.The effect of cast iron graphites on friction and wear performance I: graphite film formation on grey cast iron surfaces. Wear. 1981;66(2):209–221.
13.
MaYZhaoWLiSLubricating durability of two GF category engine oils. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2005;57:161–167.
14.
LiuYBLimSCRaySFriction and wear of aluminium-graphite composites: the smearing process of graphite during sliding. Wear. 1992;159(2):201–205.
15.
VadirajAKamarajMSreenivasanVS.Influence of load and sliding speed on friction and interface temperature of hypereutectic aalloyed gray cast iron. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2012;65(3):289–296.
16.
MaZWenQTaoDNumerical simulation and analysis of thermal conductivity of vermicular graphite cast iron. J Xi'an Technol Univ. 2016;36(07):522–527.
17.
GhaderiARNili AhmadabadiMGhasemiHM.Effect of graphite morphologies on the tribological behavior of austempered cast iron. Wear. 2003;255(1):410–416.
18.
HatateMShiotaTTakahashiNInfluences of graphite shapes on wear characteristics of austempered cast iron. Wear. 2001;251(1):885–889.
19.
AbediHRFareghiASaghafianHSliding wear behavior of a ferritic–pearlitic ductile cast iron with different nodule count. Wear. 2010;268(3–4):622–628.
20.
Perez-UnzuetaAJBeynonJH.Microstructure and wear resistance of pearlitic rail steels. Wear. 1993;162–164:173–182.
21.
Bakshi SDLeiroAPrakashBDry rolling/sliding wear of nanostructured pearlite. Mater Sci Technol. 2015;31(14):1735–1744.
22.
MishraKPachauriASinghA.Deformation, wear and microstructural evolution of nano-structured pearlite under repeated contact sliding. Tribol Lett. 2018;66(3):109.
23.
YinC-HLiangY-lLiangYFormation of a self-lubricating layer by oxidation and solid-state amorphization of nano-lamellar microstructures during dry sliding wear tests. Acta Mater. 2019;166:208–220.
24.
HuYZhouLDingHHMicrostructure evolution of railway pearlitic wheel steels under rolling-sliding contact loading. Tribol Int. 2021;154:106685.
25.
ZengDLuLZhangNInvestigation on the scuffing resistance of ductile cast iron as affected by fine particle bombardment to produce surface hardened layer and micro-dimpled surface. Wear. 2017;378–379:174–182.
26.
ChenHZhangCLiuWMicrostructure evolution of a hypereutectoid pearlite steel under rolling-sliding contact loading. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;655:50–59.
27.
KellerJFridriciVKapsaPInfluence of chemical composition and microstructure of gray cast iron on wear of heavy duty diesel engines cylinder liners. Wear. 2007;263(7–12):1158–1164.
28.
ZhengBHuangZXingJThree-body abrasive behavior of cementite–iron composite with different cementite volume fractions. Tribol Lett. 2016;62(2):32.
29.
ZhengBLiWTuXEffect of interaction between cementite and pearlite on two-body abrasive wear behaviors in white cast iron. Friction. 2021;9(6):1378–1389.
30.
SasakiTYakouTUmemotoMTwo-body abrasive wear property of cementite. Wear. 2006;260(9):1090–1095.
31.
CoronadoJJSinatoraA.Load effect in abrasive wear mechanism of cast iron with graphite and cementite. Wear. 2009;267(1):6–11.
32.
CoronadoJJ.Effect of load and carbide orientation on abrasive wear resistance of white cast iron. Wear. 2011;270(11):823–827.
33.
US-ASTM. Standard test method for wear testing with a pin-on-disk apparatus. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International.
34.
WenjunYPangJ-CWangLTensile properties and damage mechanisms of compacted graphite iron based on microstructural simulation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;814:141244.
35.
IshikawaNParksDSocrateSMicromechanical modeling of ferrite-pearlite steels using finite element unit cell models. ISIJ Int. 2000;40:1170–1179.
36.
KasvayeeKASalomonssonKGhassemaliEMicrostructural strain distribution in ductile iron; comparison between finite element simulation and digital image correlation measurements. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;655:27–35.
37.
BezdedováRKováčikováPVavroJComputational modeling of microstructure and numerical analysis of stress-strain states of cast iron with vermicular graphite shape. Procedia Eng. 2016;136:33–37.
38.
FukumasuNKPelegrinoPLCuevaGNumerical analysis of the stresses developed during the sliding of a cylinder over compact graphite iron. Wear. 2005;259(7):1400–1407.
TkayaMBMezliniSMansoriMEOn some tribological effects of graphite nodules in wear mechanism of SG cast iron: finite element and experimental analysis. Wear. 2009;267(1):535–539.
41.
HaseA.Visualization of the tribological behavior of graphite in cast iron by in situ observations of sliding interfaces. Tribol Int. 2019;138:40–46.
42.
LiuJHHaoXYLiGLMicrovoid evaluation of ferrite ductile iron under strain. Mater Lett. 2002;56(5):748–755.
43.
KimKYoonM.Characterisation of friction behaviour of flake, spheroidal, and compacted vermicular graphite cast irons. Int J Surf Sci Eng. 2015;9:1.
44.
YamashitaTHayesP.Analysis of XPS spectra of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in oxide materials. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;254(8):2441–2449.
HirasataKHayashiKInamotoY.Friction and wear of several kinds of cast irons under severe sliding conditions. Wear. 2007;263(1):790–800.
47.
GowdaDKumarDCSandeepGMTribological characterization of centrifugally cast graphite cast iron under dry and wet conditions. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(1, Part 1):145–151.
48.
GuptaKMaupiM, editors. A review on solid lubricant based machining of difficult-to-machine materials. 16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research ICMR 2018. 2018. Skovde (Sweden).
49.
GhasemiRElmquistL.The relationship between flake graphite orientation, smearing effect, and closing tendency under abrasive wear conditions. Wear. 2014;317(1):153–162.
50.
MurakamiTInoueTShimuraHDamping and tribological properties of Fe–Si–C cast iron prepared using various heat treatments. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;432:113–119.
51.
VélezJMTanakaDKSinatoraAEvaluation of abrasive wear of ductile cast iron in a single pass pendulum device. Wear. 2001;251(1):1315–1319.
52.
BoulifaMAliH.Study of the influence of alloying elements on the mechanical characteristics and wear behavior of a ductile cast iron. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale. 2021;15:74–83.
53.
MohammedWMNgEElbestawiMA.Modeling the effect of compacted graphite iron microstructure on cutting forces and tool wear. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2012;5(2):87–101.
54.
ZhangQDingHZhouGFormation of tribo-layer in the presence of Fe2O3 particles and its influence on wear performance of H13 and 45 steel. Tribology. 2017;37:823–830.
55.
ZhangQYChenKMWangLCharacteristics of oxidative wear and oxidative mild wear. Tribol Int. 2013;61:214–223.
