The present study investigated the mechanical performance of Ti–8Nb–8Zr–8Cu (at.-%) alloys containing different porosity levels. Metallographic examination and phase analysis of samples was performed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), optical microscopy (OM), energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements. The mechanical properties were detected by uniaxial compression test, micro and macro hardness measurements. The wear behaviour was determined by a dry wear test on the bulk sample. The ultimate compressive strength decreased from 1077.30 to 344.65 MPa with 50% porosity and the modulus of elasticity from 15.6 to 9.5 GPa. These values show that it may be suitable for bone replacement considering the stress shield effect.
WangK.The use of titanium for medical applications in the USA. Mater Sci Eng A. 1996; 213:134–137.
2.
SongYXuDSYangRTheoretical study of the effects of alloying elements on the strength and modulus of β-type bio-titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999; 260:269–274.
3.
GeethaMSinghAKMuraleedharanKEffect of thermomechanical processing on microstructure of a Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2001; 329:264–271.
4.
ZhouYLNiinomiMAkahoriTCorrosion resistance and biocompatibility of Ti–Ta alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005; 398:28–36.
5.
OkazakiYItoYKyoKCorrosion resistance and corrosion fatigue strength of new titanium alloys for medical implants without V and Al. Mater Sci Eng A. 1996; 213:138–147.
6.
NiinomiM.Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1998; 243:231–236.
7.
NiinomiMLiuYNakaiMBiomedical titanium alloys with Young's moduli close to that of cortical bone. Regen Biomater. 2016; 3:173–185.
8.
DavidsonJAKovacsP. USA Patent no. 4.169.597. 1992.
9.
GeethaMSinghAKAsokamaniRTi based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants–a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009; 54:397–425.
10.
HenriquesVARGalvaniETPetroniSLGProduction of Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy for surgical implants by powder metallurgy. J Mater Sci. 2010; 45:5844–5850.
11.
LiuSLiuJWangLSuperelastic behavior of in-situ eutectic-reaction manufactured high strength 3D porous NiTi–Nb scaffold. Scr Mater. 2020; 181:121–126.
12.
OkazakiYRaoSItoYCorrosion resistance, mechanical properties, corrosion fatigue strength and cytocompatibility of new Ti alloys without Al and V. Biomaterials. 1998; 19:1197–1215.
13.
KangB-MJeongW-JParkG-CThe characteristics of an antibacterial TiAgN thin film coated by physical vapor deposition technique. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015; 15:6020–6023.
14.
YorucAKarakasAElkocaOZirconia-hydroxyapatite composite coating on cp-Ti implants by biomimetic method. Adv Mat Res. 2012; 445:685–690.
15.
TamaddonMSamizadehSWangLIntrinsic osteoinductivity of porous titanium scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biomater. 2017; 2017:1–11.
16.
ZhangELiFWangHA new antibacterial titanium–copper sintered alloy: preparation and antibacterial property. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2013; 33:4280–4287.
17.
WangXDongHLiuJIn vivo antibacterial property of Ti–Cu sintered alloy implant. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2019; 100:38–47.
18.
YiCKeZZhangLAntibacterial Ti–Cu alloy with enhanced mechanical properties as implant applications. Mater Res Express. 2020; 7:105404.
19.
LiY-HChenNCuiH-TFabrication and characterization of porous Ti–10Cu alloy for biomedical application. J Alloys Compd. 2017; 723:967–973.
20.
HenriquesVARCairoCAASilvaCRMMicrostructural Evolution of Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy during sintering. Mater Sci Forum. Trans Tech Publ. 2005: 498:40–48.
21.
OkamotoH.Comment on Cu-Ti (copper-titanium). J Phase Equilib. 1994; 15:566–567.
22.
KeZYiCZhangLCharacterization of a new Ti–13Nb–13Zr–10Cu alloy with enhanced antibacterial activity for biomedical applications. Mater Lett. 2019; 253:335–338.
23.
YuanYKeZZhangLMechanical, corrosion and antibacterial properties of Ti–13Nb–13Zr-based alloys with various Cu contents. Mater Res Express. 2021; 8:115403.
24.
SunQYYuZTZhuRH.Dynamic fracture toughness of Ti–2.5 Cu alloy strengthened with nano-scale particles at room and low temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008; 483-484:131–134.
25.
ShiACaiDHuJDevelopment of a low elastic modulus and antibacterial Ti–13Nb–13Zr–5Cu titanium alloy by microstructure controlling. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2021; 126:112116.
26.
GibsonLJAshbyMF.Material properties. cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd edCambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 52–92.
27.
JhaNMondalDPMajumdarJDHighly porous open cell Ti-foam using NaCl as temporary space holder through powder metallurgy route. Mater Des. 2013; 47:810–819.
28.
HafeezNWeiDXieLEvolution of microstructural complex transitions in low-modulus β-type Ti–35Nb–2Ta–3Zr alloy manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2021; 48:102376.
29.
TuncerNArslanGMaireEInvestigation of spacer size effect on architecture and mechanical properties of porous titanium. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011; 530:633–642.
30.
LongMRackHJ.Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—a materials science perspective. Biomaterials. 1998; 19:1621–1639.
31.
SeramakTZielinskiASerbinskiWPowder metallurgy of the porous Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy of different powder grain size. Mater Manuf Processes. 2019; 34:915–920.
32.
MayaAEAGranaDRHazarabedianAZr–Ti–Nb porous alloys for biomedical application. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2012; 32:321–329.
33.
Cvijović-AlagićICvijovićZMitrovićSTribological behaviour of orthopaedic Ti–13Nb–13Zr and Ti–6Al–4V alloys. Tribol Lett. 2010; 40:59–70.
34.
RamsdenJJAllenDMStephensonDJThe design and manufacture of biomedical surfaces. CIRP Ann. 2007; 56:687–711.
35.
KumarPBabuPDMohanLWear and corrosion behavior of Zr-doped DLC on Ti–13Zr–13Nb biomedical alloy. J Mater Eng Perform. 2013; 22:283–293.
36.
XuL-JXiaoS-LJingTMicrostructure and dry wear properties of Ti–Nb alloys for dental prostheses. T Nonferr Metals Soc. 2009; 19:s639–s644.
37.
AhmedYMZIskanderBAIbrahimMMechanical properties and porosity relationship of porous iron compacts. Powder Metall. 2009; 52:72–79.
38.
MolinariAStraffeliniGTesiBDry sliding wear mechanisms of the Ti6Al4V alloy. Wear. 1997; 208:105–112.
