Carbon nanotube-reinforced aluminium normally considered to be composed of Carbon nanotube (CNT) free grain interior (GI) and CNT containing grain boundary affected zone (GBAZ). Research works showed that the property of GI varies with the distance from the boundary. To better understand the influence of this mechanical heterogeneity, we introduced a transition zone (TZ) to emphasise the mechanical heterogeneity of the GI. A dislocation-based plastic strain constitutive model was used to analyse the mechanical response, and the simulation results fit well with the experimental result. Moreover, the TZ thickness with a large simulation influence was found, and its strengthening mechanism, the influence of TZ thickness on the macroscopic mechanical response, geometrically necessary dislocation distribution were discussed in this study.
MoyaJSLopez-EstebanSPecharromanC.The challenge of ceramic/metal microcomposites and nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci. 2007; 52(7):1017–1090.
2.
BrischettoSCarreraE.Classical and refined shell models for the analysis of nano-reinforced structures. Int J Mech Sci. 2012; 55(1):104–117.
3.
KuzumakiTMiyazawaKIchinoseHProcessing of carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composite. J Mater Res. 1998; 13(9):2445–2449.
4.
KimKEckertJMenzelSGrain refinement assisted strengthening of carbon nanotube reinforced copper matrix nanocomposites. Appl Phys Lett. 2008; 92(12):121901.
5.
GeorgeRKashyapKRahulRStrengthening in carbon nanotube/aluminium (CNT/Al) composites. Scr Mater. 2005; 53(10):1159–1163.
6.
ZhangZChenD.Consideration of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites: a model for predicting their yield strength. Scr Mater. 2006; 54(7):1321–1326.
7.
ChenBKondohKUmedaJInterfacial in-situ Al2O3 nanoparticles enhance load transfer in carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Alloys Compd. 2019; 789:25–29.
8.
ZhangXLiWZhengSTemperature-dependent shear failure modes and tensile strength model of CNT/polymer nanocomposites. Compos Commun. 2021; 25:100726.
9.
KimC-SSohnINezafatiMPrediction models for the yield strength of particle-reinforced unimodal pure magnesium (Mg) metal matrix nanocomposites (MMNCs). J Mater Sci. 2013; 48(12):4191–4204.
10.
Sanaty-ZadehA.Comparison between current models for the strength of particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites with emphasis on consideration of Hall–Petch effect. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012; 531:112–118.
11.
SongSHeXZhouQAnalytical models of the strength and ductility of CNT reinforced metal matrix nano composites under elevated temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021; 813:141078.
12.
KwonHEstiliMTakagiKCombination of hot extrusion and spark plasma sintering for producing carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Carbon. 2009; 47(3):570–577.
13.
EzatpourHREbrahimiGR.The effects and improvements of GNPs + CNTs on the mechanical properties and microstructure of AZ80 matrix composite. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf. 2021; 4(3):323–338.
14.
KimKTEckertJLiuGInfluence of embedded-carbon nanotubes on the thermal properties of copper matrix nanocomposites processed by molecular-level mixing. Scr Mater. 2011; 64(2):181–184.
15.
PalSBabuPNGargeyaBMolecular dynamics simulation based investigation of possible enhancement in strength and ductility of nanocrystalline aluminum by CNT reinforcement. Mater Chem Phys. 2020; 243:122593.
16.
FariaBGuardaCSilvestreNCNT-reinforced iron and titanium nanocomposites: strength and deformation mechanisms. Compos B Eng. 2020; 187:107836.
17.
BaraiPWengGJ.The competition of grain size and porosity in the viscoplastic response of nanocrystalline solids. Int J Plast. 2008; 24(8):1380–1410.
18.
SmyshlyaevVFleckN.The role of strain gradients in the grain size effect for polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids. 1996; 44(4):465–495.
19.
DongSZhouJHuiD.A quantitative understanding on the mechanical behaviors of carbon nanotube reinforced nano/ultrafine-grained composites. Int J Mech Sci. 2015; 101–102:29–37.
20.
GuoBSongMYiJImproving the mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced pure aluminum matrix composites by achieving non-equilibrium interface. Mater Des. 2017; 120:56–65.
21.
LiuZXiaoBWangWModelling of carbon nanotube dispersion and strengthening mechanisms in Al matrix composites prepared by high energy ball milling-powder metallurgy method. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2017; 94:189–198.
22.
WeiHLiZXiongD-BTowards strong and stiff carbon nanotube-reinforced high-strength aluminum alloy composites through a microlaminated architecture design. Scr Mater. 2014; 75:30–33.
23.
TeradaKHoriMKyoyaTSimulation of the multi-scale convergence in computational homogenization approaches. Int J Solids Struct. 2000; 37(16): 2285–2311.
24.
AshbyM.The deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials. Philos Mag. 1970; 21(170):399–424.
25.
RuiS-SHanQ-NWangXCorrelations between two EBSD-based metrics Kernel average misorientation and image quality on indicating dislocations of near-failure low alloy steels induced by tensile and cyclic deformations. Mater Today Commun. 2021; 27:102445.
26.
RamazaniASchwedtAAretzACharacterization and modelling of failure initiation in DP steel. Comput Mater Sci. 2013; 75:35–44.
27.
HaltonJSmithG.Algorithm 247: radical-inverse quasi-random point sequence. Commun ACM. 1964; 7(12):701–702.
28.
HouYSapanathanTDumonAA novel artificial dual-phase microstructure generator based on topology optimization. Comput Mater Sci. 2016; 123:188–200.
29.
FritzenFBöhlkeTSchnackE.Periodic three-dimensional mesh generation for crystalline aggregates based on Voronoi tessellations. Comput Mech. 2009; 43(5):701–713.
30.
Martínez-PañedaEBetegónC.Modeling damage and fracture within strain-gradient plasticity. Int J Solids Struct. 2015; 59:208–215.
31.
HuangYQuSHwangKA conventional theory of mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity. Int J Plast. 2004; 20(4–5):753–782.
32.
TaylorGI.Plastic strain in metals. J Inst Metals. 1938; 62:307–324.
