The microstructure and properties of Al-matrix composites are directly determined by ceramic particles in the matrix, such as synthetic methods, morphologies, sizes, interface, etc., especially the distribution of particles. Hereinto, Al-matrix nanocomposites, which show brilliant, comprehensive properties, have been widely studied. How to give full play to its advantages in further applications in automotive and aerospace areas has attracted considerable attention from researchers. In this review, current development on the pre-distribution of reinforcement particles and deformation processes and microstructure, mechanical properties of Al-matrix composites reinforced with in-situ and ex-situ nanoparticles will be addressed. In addition, the corresponding development prospects and challenges of nanoparticles reinforced Al-matrix composites fabricated by a combination of pre-distribution and deformation were also summarised.
ChawlaNShenYL.Mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Adv Eng Mater. 2001: 3 (6): 357–370.
2.
ZhaoJChaiHZhangF.Formation of Al2O3/Al composites by directed melt oxidation of Al-Si-Zn alloy. J Mater Eng Perform. 2010; 19(1):46–51.
3.
KalaiselvanKMuruganNParameswaranS.Production and characterization of AA6061-B4C stir cast composite. Mater Des. 2011; 32(7):4004–4009.
4.
GengRQiuFJiangQC.Reinforcement in Al matrix composites: a review of strengthening behavior of nano-sized particles. Adv Eng Mater. 2018; 20(9):1–13.
5.
WangLDongBQiuFDry sliding friction and wear characterization of in situ TiC/Al-Cu3.7-Mg1.3 nanocomposites with nacre-like structures. J Mater Res Technol. 2020; 9(1):641–653.
6.
YangYFMuDKJiangQC.A simple route to fabricate TiC-TiB2/Ni composite via thermal explosion reaction assisted with external pressure in air. Mater Chem Phys. 2014; 143(2):480–485.
7.
ZhangDHeXLiuYThe effect of in situ nano-sized particle content on the properties of TiCx/Cu composites. J Mater Res Technol. 2021; 10:453–459.
8.
QiuFHanYChengAEffect of Cr content on the compression properties and abrasive wear behavior of the high-volume fraction (TiC-TiB2)/Cu composites. Acta Metall Sin (English Lett). 2014; 27(5):951–956.
9.
LiuYXuTLiuYWear and heat shock resistance of Ni-WC coating on mould copper plate fabricated by laser. J Mater Res Technol. 2020; 9(4):8283–8288.
10.
KlingerLGotmanIHorvitzD.In situ processing of TiB2/TiC ceramic composites by thermal explosion under pressure: experimental study and modelling. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001; 302(1):92–99.
11.
YangYFJiangQC.Reaction behaviour, microstructure and mechanical properties of TiC-TiB2/Ni composite fabricated by pressure assisted self-propagating high-temperature synthesis in air and vacuum. Mater Des. 2013; 49:123–129.
12.
ShuSYangHTongCFabrication of TiCx-TiB2/Al composites for application as a heat sink. Materials (Basel). 2016; 9(8):642.
13.
LiGXPengXHLüCX.Theoretical studies of second-order nonlinear optical properties of benzo five-membered heterocyclic squaraine derivatives. Chin J Org Chem. 2006; 26(6):839–844.
14.
LeeJWMunirZAOhyanagiM.Dense nanocrystalline TiB2-TiC composites formed by field activation from high-energy ball milled reactants. Mater Sci Eng A. 2002; 325(1–2):221–227.
15.
AminikiaB.Investigation of the pre-milling effect on synthesis of nanocrystalline TiB2-TiC composite prepared by SHS method. Powder Technol. 2012; 232:78–86.
16.
CasatiRVedaniM.Metal matrix composites reinforced by nano-particles – a review. Metals (Basel). 2014; 4(1):65–83.
17.
HuangMLiXYiHEffect of in situ TiB2 particle reinforcement on the creep resistance of hypoeutectic Al-12Si alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2005; 389(1–2):275–280.
18.
ZengYChaoYLuoZNanoparticle dispersion effect of laser-surface melting in ZrB2p/6061Al composites. J Nanoparticle Res. 2017; 19(4):154.
19.
QiuFGaoXTangJMicrostructures and tensile properties of Al–Cu matrix composites reinforced with nano-sized sicp fabricated by semisolid stirring process. Metals (Basel). 2017; 7(2):49.
20.
MojumderSThakurMSHIslamMNumerical investigation of mechanical properties of aluminum-copper alloys at nanoscale. J Nanoparticle Res. 2021; 23(1):3.
21.
NukamiTFlemingsMC.In situ synthesis of TiC particulate-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Metall Mater Trans A. 1995; 26(7):1877–1884.
22.
ZhouDQiuFWangHManufacture of nano-sized particle-reinforced metal matrix composites: a review. Acta Metall Sin (English Lett). 2014; 27(5):798–805.
23.
Akbari MKBaharvandiHRShirvanimoghaddamK.Tensile and fracture behavior of nano/micro TiB2 particle reinforced casting A356 aluminum alloy composites. Mater Des. 2015; 66(PA):150–161.
24.
WangZSongMSunCEffects of particle size and distribution on the mechanical properties of SiC reinforced Al-Cu alloy composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011; 528(3):1131–1137.
25.
WangLQiuFLiuJMicrostructure and tensile properties of in situ synthesized nano-sized TiCx/2009Al composites. Mater Des. 2015; 79:68–72.
26.
WangLQiuFOuyangLA novel approach of using ground CNTs as the carbon source to fabricate uniformly distributed nano-sized TiCx/2009Al composites. Materials (Basel). 2015; 8(12):8839–8849.
27.
QinSChenCZhangGThe effect of particle shape on ductility of SiCp reinforced 6061 Al matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999; 272(2):363–370.
28.
IssaHKTaherizadehAMalekiADevelopment of an aluminum/amorphous nano-SiO2 composite using powder metallurgy and hot extrusion processes. Ceram Int. 2017; 43(17):14582–14592.
29.
ZhangLShiJShenCB4C-Al composites fabricated by the powder metallurgy process. Appl Sci. 2017; 7(10):1009.
30.
GasemZMAliSS.Low-cycle fatigue behavior of powder metallurgy 6061 aluminum alloy reinforced with submicron-scale Al2O3 particles. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013; 562:109–117.
31.
GopalakrishnanSMuruganN.Production and wear characterisation of AA 6061 matrix titanium carbide particulate reinforced composite by enhanced stir casting method. Compos Part B: Eng. 2012; 43(2):302–308.
32.
Kumar BAMuruganN.Metallurgical and mechanical characterization of stir cast AA6061-T6-AlNp composite. Mater Des. 2012; 40:52–58.
33.
YangDLQiuFZhaoQLThe microstructure and tensile property for Al2014 composites reinforced with Ti5Si3-coated SiCp. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017; 688:459–463.
34.
WangLQiuFZouQMicrostructures and tensile properties of nano-sized SiCp/Al-Cu composites fabricated by semisolid stirring assisted with hot extrusion. Mater Charact. 2017; 131:195–200.
35.
PavitraKMitraR.Effect of age-hardening on dry sliding wear behavior of mushy state rolled in-situ Al-4.5Cu-5TiB2 composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012; 557:84–91.
36.
KhorshidMTJahromiSAJMoshksarMM.Mechanical properties of tri-modal Al matrix composites reinforced by nano- and submicron-sized Al2O3 particulates developed by wet attrition milling and hot extrusion. Mater Des. 2010; 31(8):3880–3884.
37.
TjongSCMaZY.Microstructural and mechanical characteristics of in situ metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng R: Rep. 2000; 29(3):49–113.
38.
XuJZouBTaoSFabrication and properties of Al2O3–TiB2–TiC/Al metal matrix composite coatings by atmospheric plasma spraying of SHS powders. J Alloys Compd. 2016; 672:251–259.
39.
YuanXLiuGJinHIn situ synthesis of TiC reinforced metal matrix composite (MMC) coating by self propagating high temperature synthesis (SHS). J Alloys Compd. 2011; 509(30):L301–L303.
40.
LiPKandalovaEGNikitinVI.In situ synthesis of Al-TiC in aluminum melt. Mater Lett. 2005; 59(19–20):2545–2548.
41.
LiangYFZhouJEDongSQ.Microstructure and tensile properties of in situ TiCp/Al-4.5wt-% Cu composites obtained by direct reaction synthesis. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010; 527(29–30):7955–7960.
42.
MishraSKDasSKSherbacovV.Fabrication of Al2O3-ZrB2 in situ composite by SHS dynamic compaction: a novel approach. Compos Sci Technol. 2007; 67(11–12):2447–2453.
43.
YangHYWangZChenLYInterface formation and bonding control in high-volume-fraction (TiC + TiB2)/Al composites and their roles in enhancing properties. Compos Part B: Eng. 2021; 209:108605.
44.
SongMSZhangMXZhangSGIn situ fabrication of TiC particulates locally reinforced aluminum matrix composites by self-propagating reaction during casting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008; 473(1–2):166–171.
45.
GotmanIKoczakMJShtesselE.Fabrication of Al matrix in situ composites via self-propagating synthesis. Mater Sci Eng A. 1994; 187(2):189–199.
46.
XuQHayesRWHuntWHMechanical properties and fracture behavior of layered 6061/SiCp composites produced by spray atomization and co-deposition. Acta Mater. 1998; 47(1):43–53.
47.
SongMSHuangBZhangMXStudy of formation behavior of TiC ceramic obtained by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis from Al-Ti-C elemental powders. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater. 2009; 27(3):584–589.
48.
JinSShenPZhouDSelf-propagating high-temperature synthesis of nano-TiCx particles with different shapes by using carbon nano-tube as C source. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011; 6:1–7.
49.
ChoiYMullinsMEWijayatillekeKFabrication of metal matrix composites of. Metall Trans A. 1992; 23(9):2387–2392.
50.
JinSShenPZouBMorphology evolution of TiCx grains during SHS in an Al-Ti-C system. Cryst Growth Des. 2009; 9(2):646–649.
51.
YangYFWangHYWangJGLattice parameter and stoichiometry of TiCx produced in alloyed Ti-C systems by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis. J Am Ceram Soc. 2008; 91(11):3813–3816.
52.
DongBXYangHYQiuFDesign of TiCx nanoparticles and their morphology manipulating mechanisms by stoichiometric ratios: Experiment and first-principle calculation. Mater Des. 2019; 181:107951.
53.
GaoYYDongBXQiuFThe superior elevated-temperature mechanical properties of Al-Cu-Mg-Si composites reinforced with in situ hybrid-sized TiCx-TiB2 particles. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018; 728:157–164.
54.
GaoYYQiuFShuSLMechanical properties and abrasive wear behaviors of in situ nano-TiCx/Al-Zn-Mg-Cu composites fabricated by combustion synthesis and hot press consolidation. Arch Civ Mech Eng.2018; 18(1):179–187.
55.
TokutomiJUemuraTSugiyamaSHot extrusion to manufacture the metal matrix composite of carbon nanotube and aluminum with excellent electrical conductivities and mechanical properties. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2015; 64(1):257–260.
56.
KwonHEstiliMTakagiKCombination of hot extrusion and spark plasma sintering for producing carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Carbon N Y. 2009; 47(3):570–577.
57.
LuanBFHansenNGodfreyAHigh strength Al-Al2O3p composites: Optimization of extrusion parameters. Mater Des. 2011; 32(7):3810–3817.
58.
Tochaee EBHosseiniMHRReihaniS.SMOn the fracture toughness behavior of in-situ Al-Ti composites produced via mechanical alloying and hot extrusion. J Alloys Compd. 2016; 681:12–21.
59.
ZhaoGHuangCLiuHA study on in-situ synthesis of TiB2-SiC ceramic composites by reactive hot pressing. Ceram Int. 2014; 40(1 Part B):2305–2313.
60.
KaveendranBWangGSHuangLJIn situ (Al3Zr + Al2O3np)/2024Al metal matrix composite with novel reinforcement distributions fabricated by reaction hot pressing. J Alloys Compd. 2013; 581:16–22.
61.
TjongSCWangGS.High-cycle fatigue properties of Al-based composites reinforced with in situ TiB2 and Al2O3 particulates. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004; 386(1–2):48–53.
62.
GaoQWuSLüSImprovement of particles distribution of in-situ 5 vol% TiB2particulates reinforced Al-4.5Cu alloy matrix composites with ultrasonic vibration treatment. J Alloys Compd. 2017; 692:1–9.
63.
WangQWangXCuiCXRefining and reinforcing effects of In situ AlN–TiN–TiB2/Al composite refiner on aluminum. Adv Eng Mater. 2017; 19:1–8.
64.
UanJYChenLHLuiTS.On the extrusion microstructural evolution of Al-Al3Ni in situ composite. Acta Mater. 2001; 49(2):313–320.
65.
YangHYanYLiuTUnprecedented enhancement in strength-plasticity synergy of (TiC+Al6MoTi+Mo)/Al cermet by multiple length-scale microstructure stimulated synergistic deformation. Compos Part B. 2021:225:109265.
66.
XuSWKamadoSHonmaT.Recrystallization mechanism and the relationship between grain size and Zener-Hollomon parameter of Mg-Al-Zn-Ca alloys during hot compression. Scr Mater. 2010; 63(3):293–296.
67.
WangLQiuFZhaoQSimultaneously increasing the elevated-temperature tensile strength and plasticity of in situ nano-sized TiCx/Al-Cu-Mg composites. Mater Charact. 2017; 125:7–12.
68.
GengJLiuGWangFMicrostructural correlated damage mechanisms of the high-cycle fatigued in-situ TiB2/Al-Cu-Mg composite. Mater Des. 2017; 135:423–438.
69.
GengRQiuFZhaoQLEffects of nanosized TiCp on the microstructure evolution and tensile properties of an Al-Mg-Si alloy during cold rolling. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019; 743:98–105.
70.
ChoYHLeeJMKimHJFeasible process for producing in situ Al/TiC composites by combustion reaction in an Al melt. Met Mater Int. 2013; 19(5):1109–1116.
71.
HongTShenYGengJEffect of cryogenic pre-treatment on aging behavior of in-situ TiB2/Al-Cu-Mg composites. Mater Charact. 2016; 119:40–46.
72.
SoltaniNJafari NodooshanHRBahramiAEffect of hot extrusion on wear properties of Al-15wt.% Mg2Si in situ metal matrix composites. Mater Des.2014; 53:774–781.
73.
YuanLHanJLiuJMechanical properties and tribological behavior of aluminum matrix composites reinforced with in-situ AlB2 particles. Tribol Int. 2016; 98:41–47.
74.
WangLQiuFZhaoQSuperior high creep resistance of in situ nano-sized TiCx/Al-Cu-Mg composite. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):4540.
75.
TianWSZhaoQLZhaoCJThe dry sliding wear properties of nano-sized TiCp/Al-Cu composites at elevated temperatures. Materials (Basel). 2017; 10(8):939.
76.
PandeyABMishraRSMahajanYR.On the anomalous creep behaviour of an XD Al-TiB2 composite. Scr Metall Mater. 1993; 29(9):1199–1204.
77.
MitraRChiouWAFineMEInterfaces in as-extruded XD Al/TiC and Al/TiB2 metal matrix composites. J Mater Res. 1993; 8(9):2380–2392.
78.
SiddhalingeshwarIGHerbertMAChakrabortyMEffect of mushy state rolling on age-hardening and tensile behavior of Al-4.5Cu alloy and in situ Al-4.5Cu-5TiB2 composite. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011; 528(3):1787–1798.
79.
TongXCGhoshAK.Fabrication of in situ TiC reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Mater Sci. 2001; 36(16):4059–4069.
80.
VedaniMD'ErricoFGariboldiE.Mechanical and fracture behaviour of aluminium-based discontinuously reinforced composites at hot working temperatures. Compos Sci Technol. 2006; 66(2):343–349.
81.
AltınkökN.Investigation of mechanical and machinability properties of Al2O3/SiCp reinforced Al-based composite fabricated by stir cast technique. J Porous Mater. 2015; 22(6):1643–1654.
82.
GhoshSKBandyopadhyayKSahaP.Development of an in-situ multi-component reinforced Al-based metal matrix composite by direct metal laser sintering technique – optimization of process parameters. Mater Charact. 2014; 93:68–78.
83.
YangHWangZChenLInterface formation and bonding control in high-volume-fraction (TiC+TiB2)/Al composites and their roles in enhancing properties. Compos Part B. 2021; 209:108605.
84.
TanZWangLXueYHigh-entropy alloy particle reinforced Al-based amorphous alloy composite with ultrahigh strength prepared by spark plasma sintering. Mater Des. 2016; 109:219–226.
85.
DongBLiQYangHSynergistic optimization in solidification microstructure and mechanical performance of novel (TiCxNy - TiB2)p/Al nanocomposites: Design, tuning and mechanism. Compos Part A. 2022; 155:106843.
86.
RamanathanSKarthikeyanRGanasenG.Development of processing maps for 2124Al/SiCp composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006; 441(1–2):321–325.
87.
LaskoGWeberUSchmauderS.Finite element simulations of crack propagation in Al2O3/6061Al composites. Acta Metall Sin (English Lett). 2014; 27(5):853–861.
88.
XuZYanJWuGInterface structure and strength of ultrasonic vibration liquid phase bonded joints of Al2O3p/6061Al composites. Scr Mater. 2005; 53(7):835–839.
89.
TongXCGhoshAK.Fabrication of in situ TiC reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Mater Sci. 2001; 36(16):4059–4069.
90.
ChenJLiJZhouY.In-situ synthesis of Ti3AlC2/TiC-Al2O3 composite from TiO2-Al-C system. J Mater Sci Technol. 2006; 22(4):455–458.
91.
MaZYTjongSC.In situ ceramic particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composites fabricated by reaction pressing in the TiO2 (Ti)-Al-B (B2O3) systems. Metall Mater Trans A: Phys Metall Mater Sci. 1997; 28(9):1931–1942.
92.
GudenMHallIW.High strain rate deformation behavior of a continuous fiber reinforced aluminum metal matrix composite. Comput Struct. 2000; 76(1):139–144.
93.
HongSIGrayGTLewandowskiJJ.Dynamic deformation behavior of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy matrix composites reinforced with 20 Vol.-% SiC. Acta Metall Mater. 1993; 41(8):2337–2351.
94.
TianWSZhouDSQiuFSuperior tensile properties of in situ nano-sized TiCp/Al-Cu composites fabricated by reaction in melt method. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016; 658:409–414.
95.
MaoDMengXXieYStrength-ductility balance strategy in SiC reinforced aluminum matrix composites via deformation-driven metallurgy. J Alloys Compd. 2022; 891:162078.
96.
XieYHuangYWangFDeformation-driven metallurgy of SiC nanoparticle reinforced aluminum matrix nanocomposites. J Alloys Compd. 2020; 823:153741.
97.
XieYMengXChangYAmeliorating strength-ductility efficiency of graphene nanoplatelet-reinforced aluminum composites via deformation-driven metallurgy. Compos Sci Technol. 2022; 219:109225.
98.
XieYMengXLiYInsight into ultra-refined grains of aluminum matrix composites via deformation-driven metallurgy. Compos Commun. 2021; 26:100776.
99.
XieYMengXMaoDHomogeneously dispersed graphene nanoplatelets as long-term corrosion inhibitors for aluminum matrix composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021; 13(27):32161–32174.
100.
BourgeoisLDwyerCWeylandMStructure and energetics of the coherent interface between the θ′ precipitate phase and aluminium in Al-Cu. Acta Mater. 2011; 59(18):7043–7050.
101.
AlizadehMBeniHA.Strength prediction of the ARBed Al/Al2O3/B4C nano-composites using Orowan model. Mater Res Bull. 2014; 59:290–294.
102.
ZhouDQiuFJiangQ.The nano-sized TiC particle reinforced Al-Cu matrix composite with superior tensile ductility. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015; 622:189–193.
103.
ZhangZChenDL.Consideration of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites: a model for predicting their yield strength. Scr Mater. 2006; 54(7):1321–1326.
104.
VaithyanathanVWolvertonCChenLQ.Multiscale modeling of θ′ precipitation in Al-Cu binary alloys. Acta Mater. 2004; 52(10):2973–2987.
105.
AthulKRPillaiUTSSrinivasanAA review of different creep mechanisms in Mg alloys based on stress exponent and activation energy. Adv Eng Mater. 2016; 18(5):770–794.
106.
ReinertLGreenIGimmlerSTribological behavior of self-lubricating carbon nanoparticle reinforced metal matrix composites. Wear. 2018; 408–409:72–85.
107.
LiYLangdonTG.An examination of a substructure-invariant model for the creep of metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999; 265(1–2):276–284.
108.
HanBQLangdonTG.Factors contributing to creep strengthening in discontinuously-reinforced materials. Mater Sci Eng A. 2002; 322(1–2):73–78.
109.
SpigarelliSCerriECavalierePAn analysis of hot formability of the 6061 + 20% Al2O3 composite by means of different stability criteria. Mater Sci Eng A. 2002; 327(2):144–154.
110.
KaibyshevRKazyhanovVMusinF.Hot plastic deformation of aluminium alloy 2009-15%SiCW composite. Mater Sci Technol. 2002; 18(7):777–786.
111.
BruzziMSMcHughPE.Micromechanical investigation of the fatigue crack growth behaviour of Al-SiC MMCs. Int J Fatigue. 2004; 26(8):795–804.
112.
PandeyABMishraRSMahajanYR.Effect of a solid solution on the steady-state creep behavior of an aluminum matrix composite. Metall Mater Trans A: Phys Metall Mater Sci. 1996; 27(2):305–316.
113.
TjongSCMaZY.The high-temperature creep behaviour of aluminium-matrix composites reinforced with SiC, Al2O3 and TiB2 particles. Compos Sci Technol.1997; 57(6):697–702.
114.
TianWSZhaoQLZhangQQSuperior creep resistance of 0.3wt% nano-sized TiCp/Al-Cu composite. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017; 700:42–48.
115.
PandeyABMishraRSParadkarAGSteady state creep behaviour of an Al-Al2O3 alloy. Acta Mater. 1997; 45(3):1297–1306.
